Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Electronic tuning in CeCoIn 5 : a dirty job Filip Ronning Eric Bauer Ryan Baumbach Kris Gofryk Xin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetism of the ‘11’ iron-based superconductors parent compound Fe1+xTe: The Mössbauer study A. Błachowski1, K. Ruebenbauer1, P. Zajdel2, E.E. Rodriguez3,
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 116.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 28.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
Inhomogeneous Superconductivity in the Heavy Fermion CeRhIn 5 Tuson Park Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon , South Korea IOP.
Iron pnictides: correlated multiorbital systems Belén Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC) ATOMS 2014, Bariloche Maria José.
Unveiling the quantum critical point of an Ising chain Shiyan Li Fudan University Workshop on “Heavy Fermions and Quantum Phase Transitions” November 2012,
Observation of a possible Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state in CeCoIn 5 Roman Movshovich Andrea Bianchi Los Alamos National Laboratory, MST-10.
Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
From weak to strong correlation: A new renormalization group approach to strongly correlated Fermi liquids Alex Hewson, Khan Edwards, Daniel Crow, Imperial.
ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF STRONGLY CORRELATED SYSTEMS
Pressure induced quantum phase transitions in d- and f-electron systems Vladimir A. Sidorov Institute for High Pressure Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences.
Probing Superconductors using Point Contact Andreev Reflection Pratap Raychaudhuri Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai Collaborators: Gap anisotropy.
High T c Superconductors & QED 3 theory of the cuprates Tami Pereg-Barnea
D-wave superconductivity induced by short-range antiferromagnetic correlations in the Kondo lattice systems Guang-Ming Zhang Dept. of Physics, Tsinghua.
Collin Broholm Johns Hopkins Institute for Quantum Matter  Superconductivity & spin fluctuations  CeCoIn5 ― Spin resonance ―ZEEMAN effect ― Condensation.
Non-Fermi liquid behavior and changing coherence in Ce 1−x Yb x CoIn 5 Carmen C. Almasan, Kent State University, DMR Evolution of the coherence.
 Single crystals of YBCO: P. Lejay (Grenoble), D. Colson, A. Forget (SPEC)  Electron irradiation Laboratoire des Solides Irradiés (Ecole Polytechnique)
Phase separation in strongly correlated electron systems with Jahn-Teller ions K.I.Kugel, A.L. Rakhmanov, and A.O. Sboychakov Institute for Theoretical.
Wendy Xu 286G 5/28/10.  Electrical resistivity goes to zero  Meissner effect: magnetic field is excluded from superconductor below critical temperature.
IRIDATES Bill Flaherty Materials 286K, UCSB Dec. 8 th, 2014.
Prelude: Quantum phase transitions in correlated metals SC NFL.
Anderson localization in BECs
Modeling strongly correlated electron systems using cold atoms Eugene Demler Physics Department Harvard University.
Rinat Ofer Supervisor: Amit Keren. Outline Motivation. Magnetic resonance for spin 3/2 nuclei. The YBCO compound. Three experimental methods and their.
Charge Inhomogeneity and Electronic Phase Separation in Layered Cuprate F. C. Chou Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University National.
Quantum Criticality. Condensed Matter Physics (Lee) Complexity causes new physics Range for CMP.
Eric Bauer Los Alamos National Laboratory Collaborators: J. Sarrao, J. Thompson, L. Morales, N. Curro, T. Caldwell, T. Durakiewicz, J. Joyce, A. Balatsky,
Superconductivity Characterized by- critical temperature T c - sudden loss of electrical resistance - expulsion of magnetic fields (Meissner Effect) Type.
A1- What is the pairing mechanism leading to / responsible for high T c superconductivity ? A2- What is the pairing mechanism in the cuprates ? What would.
AFM correlation and the pairing mechanism in the iron pnictides and the (overdoped) cuprates Fa Wang (Berkeley) Hui Zhai (Berkeley) Ying Ran (Berkeley)
Magnetic properties of SmFeAsO 1-x F x superconductors for 0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.2 G. Prando 1,2, P. Carretta 1, A. Lascialfari 1, A. Rigamonti 1, S. Sanna 1, L.
Fluctuation conductivity of thin films and nanowires near a parallel-
Huiqiu Yuan Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, CHINA Field-induced Fermi surface reconstruction near the magnetic quantum critical point in CeRhIn.
Ying Chen Los Alamos National Laboratory Collaborators: Wei Bao Los Alamos National Laboratory Emilio Lorenzo CNRS, Grenoble, France Yiming Qiu National.
Microscopic nematicity in iron superconductors Belén Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencias Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC) In collaboration with: Laura Fanfarillo.
B. Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC)
Superconducting Gap Symmetry in Iron-based Superconductors: A Thermal Conductivity Perspective Robert W. Hill.
Thermal Boundary Resistance of the Superfluid 3 He A-B Phase Interface D.I. Bradley S.N. Fisher A.M. Guénault R.P. Haley H. Martin G.R. Pickett J.E. Roberts.
Incommensurate correlations & mesoscopic spin resonance in YbRh 2 Si 2 * *Supported by U.S. DoE Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences & Engineering.
Coexistence and Competition of Superconductivity and Magnetism in Ho 1-x Dy x Ni 2 B 2 C Hyeon-Jin Doh, Jae-Hyuk Choi, Heon-Jung Kim, Eun Mi Choi, H. B.
An Introduction to Fe-based superconductors
2013 Hangzhou Workshop on Quantum Matter, April 22, 2013
会社名など E. Bauer et al, Phys. Rev. Lett (2004) M. Yogi et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, (2004) Kitaoka Laboratory Takuya Fujii Unconventional.
Giorgi Ghambashidze Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Tbilisi State University, GE-0128 Tbilisi, Georgia Muon Spin Rotation Studies of the Pressure.
J.P. Eisenstein, Caltech, DMR When two layers of electrons are brought close together in the presence of an intense magnetic field a new state.
Wigner-Mott scaling of transport near the two-dimensional metal-insulator transition Milos Radonjic, D. Tanaskovic, V. Dobrosavljevic, K. Haule, G. Kotliar.
Superconductivity and non-Fermi-liquid behavior of Ce 2 PdIn 8 V. H. Tran et al., PHYSICAL REVIEW B 83, (2011) Kitaoka Lab. M1 Ryuji Michizoe.
Correlated Electron State in Ce 1-x Yb x CoIn 5 Stabilized by Cooperative Valence Fluctuations Brian M. Maple, University of California, San Diego, DMR.
D :06–4:18 PM Physikon Research  Notre Dame  Arizona State  NJIT Isotope Effect in High-T C Superconductors Dale R. Harshman Physikon Research.
Fe As A = Ca, Sr, Ba Superconductivity in system AFe 2 (As 1-x P x ) 2 Dulguun Tsendsuren Kitaoka Lab. Division of Frontier Materials Sc. Department of.
Kondo Physics, Heavy Fermion Materials and Kondo Insulators
Peak effect in Superconductors - Experimental aspects G. Ravikumar Technical Physics & Prototype Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai.
From Local Moment to Mixed-Valence Regime in Ce 1−x Yb x CoIn 5 alloys Carmen Almasan, Kent State University, DMR Ce 1−x Yb x CoIn 5 alloys have.
Spatially resolved quasiparticle tunneling spectroscopic studies of cuprate and iron-based high-temperature superconductors Nai-Chang Yeh, California Institute.
Sangita Bose, Bombay Antonio Bianconi, Rome Welcome !!! A. Garcia-Garcia, Cambridge.
Exact ground states of a frustrated 2D magnet: deconfined fractional excitations at a first order quantum phase transition Cristian D. Batista and Stuart.
The quest to discover the self-organizing principles that govern collective behavior in matter is a new frontier, A New Frontier ELEMENTS BINARYTERTIARY.
Rotating FFLO Superfluid in cold atom gases Niigata University, Youichi Yanase Tomohiro Yoshida 2012 Feb 13, GCOE シンポジウム「階層の連結」, Kyoto University.
Non-Fermi liquid behavior with and without quantum criticality in Ce 1−x Yb x CoIn 5 Carmen C. Almasan, Kent State University, DMR One of the greatest.
Structure and dynamics of spin polarons induced by doping a Haldane spin-1 chain Collin Broholm * Johns Hopkins University and NIST Center for Neutron.
6/7/2016 Iron Superconductivity !! o Superconducting Gap in FeAs from PCAR o “Minimal” Model of FeAs planes – Different from CuO 2 !! o Multiband Magnetism.
Qimiao Si Rice University
Review on quantum criticality in metals and beyond
Some open questions from this conference/workshop
Routes for finding superconductors based on structural trends
Where are the superconductors?
Analysis of proximity effects in S/N/F and F/S/F junctions
Pressure-induced Superconductivity in CaFe2As2 -JPCM 20, (2008)
Ginzburg-Landau theory
Presentation transcript:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Electronic tuning in CeCoIn 5 : a dirty job Filip Ronning Eric Bauer Ryan Baumbach Kris Gofryk Xin Lu M.N. Ou (Owen) Tian Shang Joe Thompson Paul Tobash Vladamir Sidorov Jianxin Zhu (LANL) (LANL) S. Stoyko A. Mar (U. Alberta) Hiroshi Yasuoka (JAEA) Tuson Park (SKKU) Zach Fisk (UC Irvine) Los Alamos National Lab

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Outline Motivation Dirt in CeCoIn 5 Dopants locally modify hybridization Transition metal layers are NOT charge reservoir layers. (Sn vs. Pt doping) Weak pair breaking effects in CeCoIn 5 and quantifying it. Normal state transport Conclusions (K. Gofryk, et al. PRL 109, (2012))

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Reducing Dimensionality Increasing Bandwidth Increasing T c 100 x CeIn 3 CeMIn 5 PuMGa 5 Ce 2 MIn 8 T c = 0.2 K T c = 2.1 K T c = 18.5 K T c = 2.3 K 13 compounds in this family are superconductors NpPd 5 Al 2 T c = 5 K CeM 2 In 7 T c = 2.1 K

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA 2D 3D 2D 3D Reducing dimensionality to maximize pairing Monthoux, Pines, & Lonzarich, Nature 07 Enhance matching of (q, ) to Q (q, ) by reducing dimensionality CeIn 3 CeCoIn 5 Active layer Buffer layer Active layer Prototypical strongly correlated system Quantum Criticality Heavy Fermion d x2-y2 SC order parameter Monthoux & Lonzarich, PRB 02 CeCoIn 5

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Dirt as a microscope (k)=? I. Mazin Nature 10 Heavy Fermion formation Quantum criticality

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Anderson / Abrikosov-Gorkov theories + corollaries Andersons Theorem 1959 Abrikosov-Gorkov theory 1960 For a SC order parameter which DOES NOT change sign Non-magnetic impurities are weakly pair breaking Magnetic impurities are strongly pair breaking For a SC order parameter which DOES change sign Non-magnetic impurities are strongly pair breaking 1 2 S=0 1 = 2 ; S=0 S0 ; S0 X 1 2 S=0 1 2 ; S=0 X

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Debate on Fe-based superconductors S. Onarii and H. Kontani, PRL 08 Y. Nakajima, et al. PRB 10 robustness to non-magnetic impurities may suggest that the Fe-based superconductors are conventional (s++) See counter point P. Hirschfeld, et al. Rep. Prog. Phys. 11

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Doping on the active layer: In-site Doping R. Urbano, et al PRL 07 ElectronsHoles There are 2 effects (1) Electronic tuning (2) Pair breaking EXAFS: Doping is preferentially on In(1) site M. Daniel, et al PRL 05 CeMIn 5 Active layer Buffer layer Active layer Cd, Sn for In Pt for Co Sn for In

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA What is the origin of the different doping behavior? Cd, Hg, Sn for In Sn (electrons) Cd, Hg (holes) actual concentrations used from here on.

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Ce1 Co Ce2 X In1 2 x 2 x 2 supercell doping = Cd has smaller bandwidth than In Sn has larger bandwidth than In The role of the dopant atoms K. Gofryk, et al PRL 12

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Ce1 Co Ce2 X In1 J K = V fc 2 ( 1 / f + 1 / (2 f + U) ) Cd locally decrease hybridization to Ce Sn locally increases hybridization to Ce The role of the dopant atoms

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Reversible electronic tuning J K decreases with hole doping (Cd and Hg) J K increases with electron doping (Sn and Pt) Doping creates an inhomogeneous internal field J K ElectronsHoles R. Urbano, et al PRL 07

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Similarities in Cd and Hg tuning DFTPhase Diagrams C. Booth, et al PRB 09 Cd and Hg doped 115s have nearly identical phase diagrams DFT calculations with Cd and Hg impurity atoms give identical results

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA CeIn 3 CeMIn 5 Active layer Buffer layer Active layer Sn for In Pt for Co Electron dopants to distinguish buffer layers

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Sn vs Pt T c suppression Impurity potential nearly identical for Sn and Pt dopants. Implies screening length unit cell. No such thing as buffer layers in the 115s. T c 0 ~ 10 cm: Can we separate pair breaking and electronic tuning effects? K. Gofryk, et al PRL 12

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Isolate pair breaking of holes using pressure Assume that dT c /Hg = dT c /dCd L.D. Pham, et al. PRL 06 dT c max /dCd = -5 K/Cd Cd doping reversible with pressure L.D. Pham, et al. PRL 06

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Isolate pair breaking of electrons using co-doping dT c /dSn = K/Sn Tc initially increases with Hg co-doping SC suppressed, but AFM QC reversible with co- doping. dT c /dPt = K/Pt Pt and Sn doping reversible with Hg doping K. Gofryk, et al PRL 12

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Comparison of pair breaking rates dT c /dSn = K/Sn dT c /dPt = K/Pt dT c /dCd = -5 K/Cd Rare Earths Holes Electrons dT c /dR = -10 K/R Hole doping (AF droplets) is a significantly weaker pair breaker for superconductivity These are very weak suppressions, but how weak/strong is the impurity potential? Need 1/ C. Petrovic, et al. PRB 02 J. Paglione, et al, Nat. Phys. 07 Hudson, et al. Nature 01 dT c /dZn 2 dT c /dNi Cuprates:

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Extracting 1/ from resistivity 1/ = ne 2 /m* = / = 190 – 550 um T [K] pure Pt 0.09; Hg Sn 0.09; Hg R.J. Ormeno, et al. PRL 02 S. Ozcan, et al, Eur. Lett. 03 W. Higemoto, et al. JPSJ 02 d(1/ )/dSn = 330 K/Sn d(1/ )/dPt = 120 K/Pt d(1/ )/dCd = 830 K/Cd

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Comparison of pair breaking rates II Impurity scattering for non-magnetic defects is remarkably weak compared with Abrikosov-Gorkov theory K. Gofryk, et al PRL 12

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA R. Movshovich, M. Jaime, J. D. Thompson, C. Petrovic, Z. Fisk, P. G. Pagliuso, and J. L. Sarrao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5152 (2001). [6] Y. Kohori, Y. Yamato, Y. Iwamoto, T. Kohara, E. D. Bauer, M. B. Maple, and J. L. Sarrao, Phys. Rev. B 64, (2001). [7] R. J. Ormeno, A. Sibley, C. E. Gough, S. Sebastian, and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002). [8] K. Izawa, H. Yamaguchi, Y. Matsuda, H. Shishido, R. Settai, and Y. Onuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, (2001). [9] H. Aoki, T. Sakakibara, H. Shishido, R. Settai, Y. nuki, P. Miranovi, and K. Machida, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 16, L13 (2004). [10] A. Vorontsov and I. Vekhter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, (2006). [11] K. An, T. Sakakibara, R. Settai, Y. Onuki, M. Hiragi, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (2010). [12] F. Weickert, P. Gegenwart, H. Won, D. Parker, and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. B 74, (2006). [13] W. K. Park, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, and L. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008). [14] A. D. Bianchi, M. Kenzelmann, L. DeBeer-Schmitt, J. S. White, E. M. Forgan, J. Mesot, M. Zolliker, J. Kohlbrecher, R. Movshovich, E. D. Bauer, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, C. Petrovi, and M. R. Eskildsen, Science 319, 177 (2008). [15] N. Hiasa and R. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, (2008). [16] C. Stock, C. Broholm, J. Hudis, H. J. Kang, and C. Petrovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008). Could CeCoIn 5 be conventional? No Vortex Lattice Upper Critical Field Specific Heat Thermal conductivity Neutron Resonance Point Contact Andreev Reflection NQR Line Nodes! d x2-y2 !

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Spectrum of weak non-magnetic pair breaking experimenttheory Conventional SCs Cuprate SCs Fe-based SCs Short coherence length Anisotropic scattering Strong coupling Induced magnetic moments M. Franz, et al. PRB 02 G. Haran and H. Nagi, PRB 98 M.L. Kulic and O.V. Dolgov, PRB 99 P. Monthoux and D. Pines, PRB 94 Coherence length = 5 nm R. Movshovich, et al. PRL 01 Multiband SC C p / T c = 4.5 Induced moments with Cd doping NMR: R. Urbano, et al. PRL 07 Spatial Inhomogeneity E.D. Bauer, et al. PNAS 11 C. Petrovic, et al. JPCM 01 Thermal Conductivity M. A. Tanatar, et al. PRL 05; G. Seyfarth, et al. PRL 08 Point Contact Spectroscopy P. Rourke, et al. PRL 05 CeCoIn 5

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Electronic tuning of CeCoIn 5 : transport Sublinear transport unusual QCP Mirrored by C p data (Fisher-Langer) The influence of disorder on the normal state is still poorly understood. CeIrIn 5 has a more expected response to disorder

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Electronic tuning of CeIrIn 5 : C p Bulk T c suppressed with doping. QCP at slight hole doping. Pt and Sn doping nearly identical ElectronsHoles T. Shang, et al unpublished

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA CeIrIn 5 : low T transport summary Pt and Sn doping nearly identical expected behavior for a 2D AFM QCP. T. Shang, et al unpublished

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Revisiting dimensionality in the 115 family Monthoux, Pines, & Lonzarich, Nature 07 CePt 2 In 7

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Possible future direction CeIn 3 LDAWannierizationTight Binding Impurity potentials SC instability Model Hamiltonians (+U) Doniach Diagram

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Conclusions Doping CeMIn 5 has both a pair breaking effect and an electronic tuning effect both of which influence T c. Similarity of Pt and Sn doping implies no buffer layer in CeMIn 5. Electron and hole doping locally modifies the hybridization and is reversible w.r.t. magnetism Pair breaking is remarkably weak compared to Abrikosov-Gorkov theory hole dopants are weaker than rare earth or electron dopants. K. Gofryk, et al. PRL 109, (2012)