Monte Carlo tuning using ATLAS data Davide Costanzo (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) 1MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Open beauty production in pp collisions at 7 TeV with CMS Kajari Mazumdar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India. on behalf of CMS Collaboration,
Review on initial conditions that allow for a successful description of the RHIC data on spectra, V2, (as)HBT, etc… Tom Humanic Ohio State University WPCF.
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Color Reconnection Systematic‏ New models of Color Reconnection (CR) have been introduced in recent versions of PYTHIA starting with V6.3. In our analyses.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Julia Velkovska Selected CMS Results from pp collisions 27th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Winter Park, Colorado Feb 6-13, 2011.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Interjet Energy Flow at ZEUS. Patrick Ryan. Univ. of Wisconsin DPF, Aug. 27, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Aug. 27, 2004 Interjet Energy.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
1 Sparsh Navin – University of Birmingham for the ALICE collaboration Trigger Efficiencies in ALICE and Diffraction in PYTHIA Diffractive and electromagnetic.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Jet Physics Selected results from ATLAS and CMS Yanwen Liu Univ. of Science and Technology of China On Behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations September.
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.
Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
First Results from ATLAS on QCD, Quarkonia and Heavy-flavour Physics in p-p collisions at 7TeV Charged particle multiplicities Underlying event Jets Quarkonia.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
PIC 2011, Vancouver August 29, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Physics in Collision Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Examine.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Jet Energy and Resolution at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta YETI meeting, 7/1/2008.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Jet production and αs measurements at CMS
Energy Dependence of the UE
Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Lake Louise Winter Institute
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
CDF Run 2 Monte-Carlo Tunes
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Introduction to Monte Carlo Event Generators
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Monte Carlo tuning using ATLAS data Davide Costanzo (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) 1MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

Monte Carlo simulation process The Monte Carlo simulation of the ATLAS detector is used in most ATLAS papers/results Event generators: Pythia6, Pythia8, Herwig, Herwig++, Alpgen, AcerMC Powheg, Sherpa... AtlasG4 simulation Reconstruction, Analysis, Systematics Data Reconstruction, Analysis Data/MC comparison example ATLAS-CONF Search for Supersymmetry with MET, bjets and no leptons 2MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011 Tuning a combination of event generator and simulation parameters

Event Generator tunings ATL-PHYS-PUB ATL-PHYS-PUB PYTHIA 6 is used as the main general-purpose event generator in ATLAS. The tune is performed in four stages: 1) Flavour parameters tuned to hadron multiplicities/ratios, from e+e- collisions 2) Final State Radiation (FSR) and hadronisation parameters, tuned to event shapes and jet rates from e+e- collisions 3) Initial state shower parameters and primordial kT, tuned to Tevatron and ATLAS data 4) Multiple Partonic Interaction (MPI) parameters, tuned to Tevatron and ATLAS data For HERWIG/JIMMY, only the MPI parameters were tuned: The inverse proton radius squared [PRRAD] The MPI cut-off at s = 1800 GeV [PTJIM0] The MPI cut-off evolution [EXP] Energy evolution of the MPI cut-off was added to HERWIG/JIMMY MPI model, to allow simultaneous tuning to 7 TeV and 900 GeV ATLAS UE data. 3MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

Pythia 6 tune ATL-PHYS-PUB MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011 AUET2B tuning to ATLAS data. To be used for 2011 analyses AUET2B (CTEQ6L1) main Pythia 6 tune for ATLAS MC11

Pythia 8 tune ATL-PHYS-PUB MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011 Pythia8 has a better diffractive modelling than Pythia 6 ATLAS A1 and AU1 tunes to s=7TeV minimum bias and underlying event data For ATLAS MC11

Herwig/Jimmy tune ATL-PHYS-PUB MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

The AtlasG4 simulation EPJC 70 (2010) 823 Over 10 9 events simulated with AtlasG4 so far A few examples of AtlasG4 tuning using data in the next few slides 7MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

Inner Detector material validation Use photon conversions in the Inner Detector to map the material distribution: Conversion rate (in colour) for R vs z The beam pipe, the pixel barrel and part of the SCT detectors are visible 8MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

Inner Detector material validation (2) Conversion rates for fixed eta: Small discrepancies still visible, geometry description in continuous evolution 9MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011

Inner Detector hadron-graphy Reconstruct secondary vertices inclusively and select those arising from secondary hadronic interactions MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data Cooling Pipe, Cables, Carbon Fibre shell Details of modules in 1 st Pixel layer. 1023/08/2011

Calorimeter response to single hadrons ATLAS-CONF Measure the calorimeter response to isolated tracks in pp collisions: E=Energy deposited in the calorimeter p=track momentum E/p for isolated tracks (2.2<p<2.8 GeV) Translates into a jet energy scale uncertainty of 1% to 3% Pythia AMBT1 tune Geant4 QGSP_BERT Physics list (Central region)

Calorimeter response to single hadrons (2) ATLAS-CONF Use Ks -> π + π -, Λ-> π - p and Λ -> π + p to measure response to pion, protons and anti-protons Response to anti-protons underestimated by MC (Only few % of the total energy in a jet) Pythia AMBT1 tune Geant4 QGSP_BERT Physics list (Central region)

Jet shape measurement PRD Differential jet shape ρ(r): Average fraction of jet PT in an annulus or radius r Jets are composed by hadrons. The distribution of the hadrons within the jet depends on the parton-jet fragmentation process ATL-PHYS-PUB

Conclusions 14MonteCarlo tuning using ATLAS data23/08/2011 Simulation is a very important component of the ATLAS physics programme Different components need to be tuned and validated. Tuning is a cyclic process : - Event generators - Geant4 MonteCarlo - ATLAS detector response A good agreement is achieved between the ATLAS data and simulation With more data available small discrepancies become visible resulting in a continuous improvement of the ATLAS Monte Carlo strategy

Response to electrons Use J/Psi and Z decay to study the response to electrons

Response to muons Use Z->μμ events to study the response to muons. The Z mass reconstructed width, and hence the muon momentum resolution is underestimated in the simulation