SCU Development at LBNL Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Superconducting Undulator R&D Review Jan. 31, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Advertisements

Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Undulator R & D Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK BAW-2 SLAC Jan 2011.
SCU Measurements at LBNL
Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
1 Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Cost Update Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 10 February 2005.
David H. Dowell Injector RF Design November 3, LCLS Injector RF Gun: Design, Fabrication & Tuning Plans D. H. Dowell,
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Applied superconductivity group L. García-Tabarés, F. Toral, I. RodriguezCIEMAT, I/2008.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
MCTF Alexander Zlobin MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April MCTF Magnet and HTS Conductor R&D.
BNG Industrial experience on Superconducting Undulators C. Boffo, T. Gehrard, B. Schraut, J. Steinmann, W. Walter, Babcock Noell GmbH T. Baumbach, S. Casalbuoni,
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
MCTF Michael Lamm MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Magnet R&D for Muon Accelerator R&D Program Goals Proposed Studies Preliminary Effort and Cost.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
SuperConducting Undulator (SCU) R&D Motivation and Status P. Emma For the SCU R&D collaboration: ANL, LBNL, SLAC June 27, 2014.
End Design Discussion D. Arbelaez (LBNL) Oct. 7,
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.
Abstract: The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) is an international effort sited at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which will demonstrate ionization.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting #28 Sofia, Bulgaria.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Task 6: Short Period Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator Jim Clarke/George Ellwood 28/11/2012.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
The Berkeley Center for Magnet Technology Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of America Member’s Meeting September 23, 2015 Steve Gourlay Director,
Superconducting Magnet Development for Ex-Situ NMR FY04 Plan G. Sabbi, 3/31/03.
11 T Dipole Project Goals and Deliverables M. Karppinen on behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration “Demonstrate the feasibility of Nb3Sn technology for the DS.
Superconducting undulator options for x-ray FEL applications
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
X LCLS SCU NbTi Prototype Schedule Version: February 12, 2015 Update 23JUN2015 X X System complete and ready for test X System complete & tested w/Hall.
SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting, Dec. 16, 2014 SCU Presentations Today Intro. & Performance Motivations (P. Emma, SLAC, 20+5) Conceptual Cryostat Design: Option-A.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
Proposed LCLS-II SCU Schedule Soren Prestemon (LBNL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
D. Arbelaez for the LBNL LCLS SCU team Mar. 3,
Design and Measurement Results for the Permanent Magnet Undulators for the Linac Coherent Light Source Facility II D. Arbelaez BeMa2014, 01/02/2014.
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Soren Prestemon, Beam Dynamics meets Magnets-II, Bad Zurzach Superconducting technologies for Light Source Undulators: Overview on the challenges in design,construction.
Summary of the 2014 Superconducting Undulator Workshop Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory and The Cockcroft Institute Beam Dynamics Meets Magnets - II,
Part 2: NbTi Magnet Performance Yury Ivanyushenkov for the APS SCU Team: S. Bettenhausen, C. Doose, M. Kasa, Q. Hasse, I. Kesgin, D. Jensen, S. Kim, G.
Closing Session Report
NSLS-II Insertion Devices
FEL SCU development at APS/ANL
Summary of Session: Magnets and undulators for light sources 2
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Spectrometer Solenoid Update
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Fast Kicker R&D in the Americas Region
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Presentation transcript:

SCU Development at LBNL Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Superconducting Undulator R&D Review Jan. 31, 2014

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Outline Background Areas of contribution to the proposal Status of technology in each area and proposed R&D – Test cryostat for tuning development – Tuning concepts – Nb 3 Sn SCU prototyping – SCU testing Cost estimate: LBNL contribution Project schedule: LBNL contribution Infrastructure and resource availability Conclusions

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Background Long history in undulator development at LBNL – ~1985: Halbach initiated development of PM technology – ~1991-: Development, fabrication, and implementation of large number of plane-polarizing and elliptically-polarizing undulators for the ALS – ~ : Studies of NbTi helical SCUs for SLAC FEL – 2002-: Development of Nb 3 Sn SCUs *First LDRD, ALS-motivated: 2003 – Prototype 1 *Continuation LDRD, ALS-motivated: 2004 – Prototype 2 *WFO funding from ANL: 2006 – Prototype 3 LDRD, Variable-polarizing undulator, NGLS-motivated: 2011 *NGLS R&D funds: *Continued funding via LDRD:mid-2013, 2014 – 2012-: Responsible for the LCLS-II hybrid PM baseline undulators

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Areas of contribution Tuning system scale-up – Scale-up existing tuning concept and test off-line Tuning test cryostat – Simple extension of existing cryogen free cryostat: 1m => 1.5m – Primary purpose: will allow testing of tuning system in parallel with main cryostat fabrication avoid risk of commissioning tuning system late in project Nb 3 Sn 1.5m prototype – 18.5mm period, end corrections – Potential for significant performance enhancement or significantly increased performance margin (e.g. temperature) vs NbTi Testing – Participate in testing and tuning of SCU prototype in the ANL Test Cryostat

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Tuning concepts Guidelines: – Want method that provides sufficient degree-of-freedom correction – Want to minimize cool-down => warm-up cycles – Want minimal complexity Approach: – Single active electrical circuit drives multiple correctors in series – Initially large selection of possible corrector locations At each location +I cor,0,-I cor are allowed – Optimize distribution of active correctors to minimize trajectory and phase-shake errors.

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Tuning concept scale-up General approach to field-errors: – Minimize errors via tight machining tolerances, assembly – Eliminate global steering and displacement via end correction coils – But… also provide a mechanism for local field error correction Use detailed error analysis to develop algorithm for tuning concept scale-up – Many poles (N) can have correction loop carrying current ±I cor – I cor can be varied with main coil current I 0 – N varies from undulator to undulator selected based on measurements

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Tuning concept: basics

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Tuning concept - improvements

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Tuning concept scale-up: proposed R&D Scale up tuning concept for application to 1.5m undulators Demonstrate concept off-line (no undulator) in advance of NbTi and Nb 3 Sn undulator readiness Develop algorithms to optimize corrections based on measured field and/or first and second integrals

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Existing Test Cryostat: features A cryogen-free test cryostat has been fabricated – Currently compatible with 1m prototypes – Uses 2 pulsed-tube cryocoolers – 500A HTS leads for main coil – 250A HTS leads for end correctors – 250A HTS leads for tuning system – Large number of possible diagnostics (thermal, voltage,…)

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Test cryostat: details

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Test cryostat modifications for tuning development: proposed R&D Extend existing cryostat ends to allow 1.5m testing – Need additional spools with flanges – Need appropriate cryogenic shielding Modify existing pulsed wire system to accommodate new length Commission modifications via demonstration of cryogenic performance Use test cryostat to demonstrate scale-up of tuning concept in advance of undulator prototype readiness minimize schedule risk

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn SCU development at LBNL: background Motivated by performance potential

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn superconductor options

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn prototyping: history (1) Prototype 1 (2003): – Demonstrated that superconducting undulators operating at very high current densities (J E >1500A/mm 2, resulting in J cu >6000 A/mm 2 during a quench) can be passively protected without damage

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn prototyping: history (2) Prototype 2 (2004): – Demonstrated that simple current loop on a pole can provide adequate field perturbation to serve as tuning mechanism

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn prototyping: history (3) Prototype 3 (ANL funded; 2006) one- yoke only Demonstrated field performance consistent with predicted B(λ,g m ) curves, as used by Paul Emma

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 SCU development for FELs - ongoing Systematic R&D undertaken to address key technological issues with high-performance superconducting undulators – Development of an SCU short model to => demonstrate field performance – Development of a magnet measurement system to => evaluate field quality – Development of a shimming concept to => correct trajectory and phase-shake errors

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn prototyping: ongoing… Nb3Sn prototype for FEL applications: – λ=20mm, g m =7.5mm, 50cm device – Optimized end design – Tight fabrication tolerances Detailed tolerance and tuning analysis

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 End design (1) Odd number of poles chosen for prototype – Non-ideal effects due to finite permeability and differential saturation of end poles – End kick is dependent on the undulator field – Dipole field is generated by unbalanced yoke field As field is ramped: Pole 2 saturates before 1

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 End design (2) Odd number of poles Ideal end design is used for the main coil (1/8, 1/2, 7/8) Kick corrector + field clamps placed at each end (only generates a kick) Dipole corrector is co-wound with the main coil in the first pocket (generates both kick and dipole) Strength of both correctors is varied as a function of the undulator field (look-up table)

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb 3 Sn prototyping: ongoing - fabrication

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Status

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Nb3Sn prototype: proposed R&D Design and fabricate a Nb 3 Sn prototype – λ=18.5mm, g m =7.5mm, 1.5m Document all design choices Document all fabrication tolerances Identify issues associated with future scale-up to industrial fabrication level

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 SCU testing: capabilities Pulsed wire development – Demonstrated accuracy on SLAC ECHO undulator – Will be incorporated in tuning test cryostat for use during tuning scale-up testing at LBNL – Will be incorporated into ANL test cryostat for SCU testing and tuning

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 SCU testing: proposed R&D Implement pulsed-wire in tuning cryostat for tuning scale-up testing Implement pulsed-wire system in ANL test cryostat Demonstrate tuning on NbTi undulator in ANL test cryostat Demonstrate tuning on Nb 3 Sn undulator in ANL test cryostat

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Summary: proposed LBNL contributions Modifications of an existing cryocooler-based, cryogen-free test cryostat to allow development of a tuning system commensurate with the 1.5m SCU prototypes Development of a 1.5m scale tuning system, based on concepts already tested and proven in previous work at LBNL. Nb 3 Sn SCU design and fabrication. The Nb 3 Sn SCU prototype will have a period λ=18.5mm. Contribute to prototype testing in the ANL test cryostat

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Schedule and Cost for LBNL effort NOTE: This estimate does not include contingency

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Infrastructure

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Resources Engineering Division: – Magnetic Systems group Accelerator and Fusion Research Division: – Superconducting Magnet Group Together we have a strong team with expertise in: – Magnetics and magnetic systems – Undulators: design, fabrication, and implementation – Superconducting magnets – Cryogenics Ample resources are available to perform the proposed R&D Work will not be limited by resource availability

SCU R&D Review, Jan. 31, 2014 Summary We have designed, fabricated and tested multiple prototypes that provide credibility to the proposed design point, and have invested in significant analysis to support the tuning concept. We have infrastructure and resources available to perform the proposed work. The proposed LBNL contributions: tuning system development and 1.5m Nb 3 Sn design and fabrication, complement the ANL part of the proposal and are critical to minimize risk for the project so as to achieve LCLS-II undulator specifications