Principle 4: FAR Involvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCAA Financial Aid Basics
Advertisements

COLLEGE SEARCH 2009/2010. Introduction Matching Yourself with the Program TRANSITION: High School/Club to College Soccer.
Welcome to the World of Compliance
Principle 13 Community Engagement/ Game Environment.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
Athletics Compliance Office Review – Recommendations, Responses and Best Practices Presentation at PAC-12 Meetings December 2013.
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
Origins, Development, and Current Structure. Origins President Swain’s weekly faculty meetings l Student absences and misbehavior discussed l Trial of.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
DIVISION I GOVERNANCE UPDATE Brandy Hataway Kris Richardson 1.
February 15, 2011 PRESENTED BY THE VIRGINIA TECH OFFICE OF ATHLETICS COMPLIANCE.
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.
Principle 10 Diversity and Inclusion. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the principle of diversity and inclusion.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Principle 8 Athletic Trainers. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an adequate number of certified athletic trainers (per.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Auburn University Athletics Compliance Program Susan Bazemore Krissy Ellis Bernard Hill Jamie Funk Diana Martin Rich McGlynn David Mines.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 15 – Financial Aid Brandy Hataway Jeff Myers.
COACHES MEETING Boston College Compliance Office October 21, 2008.
Admissions/Registrars & Athletics: How To Make It Work! Anthony Gallina, Coordinator, Undergraduate Admissions – Oakland University Christopher Goeth,
Monthly Rules Education Session November 2011 Best Practices 1.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Beginning of the Year Coaches Meeting August, 28, 2007.
Carol Bonner Athletic Certification Specialist Robert Morris University.
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
Principle 9 Academic Success. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the academic success of its student-athletes,
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
The NCAA, its Conferences, and the Economics of Athletics.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
NCAA INFORMATION Athletic scholarships can be offered by Division I and Division II colleges Division III schools do not award athletic scholarships –DIII.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
Student-Athlete Advising Round Table – Fall 2010.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
CSUSM Softball Digs Community Service. Topics Goal 1  Graduating Our Student- Athletes NCAA Eligibility Requirements NCAA Progress toward Degree Academic.
Faculty Governance Origins, Development, and Current Structure.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, December 7, 2012.
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Recruiting Prospective Students.
NCAA Division III Institutional Performance Program Eric Hartung Nicole Hollomon Erin Irick.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
Athletics Certification Orientation
Trust, Accountability and Integrity: Board Responsibility for
Eric Brey Kelly Brummett Katy Yurk
Athletics Information for Recruited Varsity Student-Athletes
Institutional Committee Recommendations
NCAA Initial Eligibility Standards
Playing Sports in College
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
Department of Intercollegiate Athletics Board of Trustees Academic Affairs Committee Mr. Earl Hilton, Director February 17, 2012.
NCAA Compliance & Financial Aid
Andy Cardamone Eric Mayes Katy Yurk
Guide for College-bound student-athlete
Playing Sports in College
Faculty Athletics Representative Annual Report November 9, 2018
College bound Student-Athletes
Welcome to the World of Compliance
What Presidents Need to Know About Intercollegiate Athletics
Division II Financial Aid
Presentation transcript:

Principle 4: FAR Involvement A model Division II member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative as the key institutional liaison to the athletics department and should be supported and funded by the institution to perform these functions.

Best Practices: FAR Involvement FAR reports directly to CEO and serves advisory role with athletics committee and AD Certifies athletics eligibility, administers coaches’ certification test, monitors countable hours Active role in institutional rules compliance program and self-reporting process Involved in Institutional Self-Study Guide process

Best Practices: FAR Involvement Oversight of academic and personal welfare of student-athletes, and attends SAAC Meetings Represents the institution at conference and NCAA meetings Submits nominations for NCAA Post-Graduate scholarships and academic awards Serves on Financial Aid Hearing Committee in any case involving athletics-related financial aid

Best Practices: FAR Involvement Serves on any athletics department search committees Supports “conflict of avoidance” scheduling DII FARs are developing a best practices Web site Others: visible to student-athletes, serves on AD admin. team, institutional waivers and appeals, investigations and violations, reports regularly to faculty senate