e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Advertisements

Electron cloud tune shift measurements for long trains Tune Shift versus current: Measured the tune shift for 45 and 115 bunch positron trains with 14ns.
ECFA-DESY workshop, NIKEF 1 st April, 2003Nick Walker, DESY Energy Spread Measurement in the TESLA Extraction Line Nick Walker - DESY.
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
MERIT Autoradiographs P. Thieberger, BNL (Dec. 21, 2011)
Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Intra-beam Scattering -- a RHIC Perspective J. Wei, W. Fischer Collider-Accelerator Department EIC Workshop,
Beam-beam Observations in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, March.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
E- Cloud Machine Studies-Systematic Study of Single Bunch Tunes I. Pinger timing effect on single bunch tunes II. Vertical/horizontal pinger high voltage.
EBPM kw achievements Kirsten Hacker. Summary Trombone fiducialization and characterization of hyteresis and backlash Accurate measurements of ACC1.
Photon Beam Position Stability Mike Grissom UNCW July 29,2005.
Photon Beam Position Stability Mike Grissom UNCW July 29,2005.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Low Luminosity Opportunities Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ ADM November 18, 2005 “easy” “really hard”
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Wire Scanners Observations In SPS & LHC G. TRAD Emittance working group 26/08/2015.
Update on the CNI polarimeter results for Run02 1.Bunch-by-bunch polarization study 2.Profiles of 0-pol bunches Osamu Jinnouchi.
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: BWS pCVD Measurements on SPS BA5 BWS51731 BE-BI-BL Jose Luis Sirvent Blasco 2 Jose Luis Sirvent.
IBS and luminosity evolution with higher harmonic RF Tom Mertens (former Technical Student now doing PhD in Quantum Field Theory in Brussels) Some changes.
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
RF measurements during floating MD in Week 40 3 rd of October 2012 LIU-SPS BD WG 25/10/2012 Participants: T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, J. Esteban.
LHC LHC Wire Scanners: Updates on Measurement Accuracy Emittance Meeting 18 November 2015 Maria Kuhn – 18 November 2015 Many thanks to G. Baud, E. Bravin,
New Studies on Electron Clouds and Specific Luminosity
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics
Muon stopping target optimization
e- Cloud Machine Studies-Tune Shift Studies
Longitudinal Effects in Space Charge Dominated Cooled Bunched Beams
e-/e+ Vertical beam size with 6 Wigglers Low and Off
Summary of Space-Charge Measurements, 2011
Tilt Correction to Geometric Hourglass Effect
The Life and Times of Cosmic-ray Muons
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
The Effect of Poisson Data Weighting on Streak Camera Diagnostics
e+/e- Vertical Beam Dynamics during CHESS Operation-Part II
xBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson
Beam Instrumentation Meeting – Dan Peterson
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
Sunday
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Electron cloud studies at CESR
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
e-/e+ Vertical Beam Dynamics with 6 and 12Wigglers On
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
Section 2.3 Pictures of Data
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
G. Codner, E. Tanke, M. Palmer Cornell University
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
Which Test Should I Use?.
Transverse size and distribution of FEL x-ray radiation of the LCLS
Beam Size Flip-Flop Measurements
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Bunch Profiling with a Rotating Mask
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Preliminary Analysis of April 24, 2006 CESR Bunch Measurements
Accelerator Physics Landau Damping and Beam-Beam Effect
M. Forster, G. Codner, R. Holtzapple, J. Kern, and E.Tanke
Presentation transcript:

e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions E. Tanke, R. Holtzapple Data taken 8/3/2006

e+ Average Vertical Beam Size: Parasitic measurements made during CESR-c colliding beams. The vertical distribution is averaged over 100 turns (10,000 turn total). Fit each PMT profile to a Gaussian distribution to determine the sv(15.6 pixels/mm calibration). Three separate data sets taken at different PMT voltages. Typical 100 turn average e+ distribution. PMT=550V Goodness of fit=0.97 PMT=600V Goodness of fit=0.95 PMT=650V Goodness of fit=0.96

Average sv for three different PMT voltages. e+ vertical beam size decreases along each train! e+ sv decreases with PMT voltage! Vertical beam size is ~20% larger than previous measurement on 8/1/06.

Mean position of vertical distribution for each train. e+ vertical position increases along each train.

Mean position of vertical distribution increases along the bunch train. e+ sv decreases with PMT voltage!

Single bunch current Correlation between sv and mean position of the vertical distribution.

e+ Single Turn Vertical Beam Size: Single turn vertical distribution for 500 turns. Typical single turn distribution. Noisy signal! PMT=550V Goodness of fit=0.51 PMT=650V Goodness of fit=0.65

Large oscillation in vertical beam size. Goodness of fit typically between 0.4-0.8. GOF>0.95 for average sv.

Summary The e+ sv decreases along each trains. The relative mean position of the distribution increases along each train. This is consistent with previous measurements (8/1/06). sv decreases with PMT voltage. The single turn vertical distribution is noisy. The goodness of fit is below an expectable level for a reliable measurement.