e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

AR1 BPM Calibration (for new electronics) Before any TOA measurements we attempted to look at the BPM calibration (AR2-BPM-03) Turn off quads (Q1,Q2) and.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Electron cloud tune shift measurements for long trains Tune Shift versus current: Measured the tune shift for 45 and 115 bunch positron trains with 14ns.
ECFA-DESY workshop, NIKEF 1 st April, 2003Nick Walker, DESY Energy Spread Measurement in the TESLA Extraction Line Nick Walker - DESY.
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
MERIT Autoradiographs P. Thieberger, BNL (Dec. 21, 2011)
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Simulation of IP beam size with orbit jitter + wakefield in EXT-FF ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
07/27/2004XFEL 2004 Measurement of Incoherent Radiation Fluctuations and Bunch Profile Recovery Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Recent electron cloud studies at CESR David Rice Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Scaling of High-Energy e+e- Ring Colliders K. Yokoya Accelerator Seminar, KEK 2012/3/15 Accelerator Seminar Yokoya 1.
IPM status and plans 1.Yellow vertical detector has extremely low coupling to beam and to signal-gating grid. It also has improved resolution due to reduced.
EBPM kw achievements Kirsten Hacker. Summary Trombone fiducialization and characterization of hyteresis and backlash Accurate measurements of ACC1.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Physics 114: Lecture 8 Measuring Noise in Real Data Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
F Monitor of Beam in the Abort Gap Randy Thurman-Keup DOE Review of Tevatron Operations at FNAL March 29-31, 2005 a.k.a. Abort Gap Integrator (AGI)
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
Effect of high synchrotron tune on Beam- Beam interaction: simulation and experiment A.Temnykh for CESR operating group Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Straw prototype test beam 2017: first glance at the data
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
e- Cloud Machine Studies-Tune Shift Studies
ECAL Energy Correction for Dead Cells_August
Advanced Beam Dump for FCC-ee
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
e-/e+ Vertical beam size with 6 Wigglers Low and Off
Tilt Correction to Geometric Hourglass Effect
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
The Effect of Poisson Data Weighting on Streak Camera Diagnostics
e+/e- Vertical Beam Dynamics during CHESS Operation-Part II
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Electron cloud studies at CESR
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
OSC simulation update Suntao Wang 10/06/2017.
e-/e+ Vertical Beam Dynamics with 6 and 12Wigglers On
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
G. Codner, E. Tanke, M. Palmer Cornell University
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
High harmonic generation in a large-volume capillary for seeding of free-electron lasers Siew Jean Goh.
M. Forster, G. Codner, R. Holtzapple, J. Kern, and E.Tanke
Imperial laser system and analysis
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Beam Size Flip-Flop Measurements
Bunch Profiling with a Rotating Mask
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Preliminary Analysis of April 24, 2006 CESR Bunch Measurements
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
M. Forster, G. Codner, R. Holtzapple, J. Kern, and E.Tanke
Injection design of CEPC
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions E. Tanke, R. Holtzapple Data taken 8/1/2006

e+ Average Vertical Beam Size: Parasitic measurements made during CESR-c colliding beams. The vertical distribution is averaged over 100 turns (10,000 turn total). Fit each PMT profile to a Gaussian distribution to determine the sv(15.6 pixels/mm calibration). Two separate data sets taken. Typical 100 turn average e+ distribution. Note: Fit values shown here are in pixels not mm here

Average sv for two data sets. 100 turn pulse to pulse sv. e+ vertical beam size decreases along each train (except for train 3)!

Mean position of vertical distribution for each train. e+ vertical position increases along each train. Correlation between sv and mean position of the vertical distribution.

Single bunch current Slight correlation between beam size and current

e+ Single Turn Vertical Beam Size: Single turn vertical distribution for 500 turns. Typical single turn distribution Vertical beam size for bunch 1 over 500 turns Average single turn sv-Vertical beam size decreases along the train!

Single turn mean position along the trains Single bunch mean position for bunch 1.

e- Average Vertical Beam Size:: The vertical distribution is averaged over 100 turns (10,000 turn total). Fit each distribution to Gaussian to determine the vertical beam size (5.5 pixels/mm calibration) Vertical beam size growth along each train (except for train 1)! Average sv. Typical distribution 100 turn pulse to pulse sv.

Current/bunch increases along each train (except for train 7). Vertical position for each bunch along the train

e- Single Turn Vertical Beam Size: Single turn vertical distribution for 500 turns. Typical single turn distribution Single turn vertical beam size for bunch 1 over 500 turns Single turn mean position for bunch 1 over 500 turns

Summary The positron sv decreases along the 3 bunch trains. In addition, the relative mean position of the distribution increases along the train which results in a correlation between sv and the mean vertical distribution. The electron sv increases along the 3 bunch trains. From the single turn analysis it is evident that the e- sv jitter (standard deviation) is ~3 time larger than the e+ sv jitter. The e- mean position jitter is ~2.5 times larger than the e+ mean position jitter.