Ilan D Zipkin, Rachel M Kindt, Cynthia J Kenyon  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Mary Sym, Naomi Robinson, Cynthia Kenyon  Cell 
Clarissa A. Henry, Sharon L. Amacher  Developmental Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Differential Functions of the C
Tissue-Specific Activities of C
Cyclin D Regulation of a Sexually Dimorphic Asymmetric Cell Division
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
The let-7 microRNA Directs Vulval Development through a Single Target
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
The TBP-like Factor CeTLF Is Required to Activate RNA Polymerase II Transcription during C. elegans Embryogenesis  Linda Kaltenbach, Michael A. Horner,
Regulation of Presynaptic Terminal Organization by C
Paola Dal Santo, Mary A Logan, Andrew D Chisholm, Erik M Jorgensen 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Fluoxetine-Resistant Mutants in C
Paul D Baum, Gian Garriga  Neuron  Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Jennifer Whangbo, Cynthia Kenyon  Molecular Cell 
The VAB-1 Eph Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Functions in Neural and Epithelial Morphogenesis in C. elegans  Sean E George, Kristin Simokat, Jeff Hardin, Andrew.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
The let-7 microRNA Directs Vulval Development through a Single Target
Repression of Cell-Cell Fusion by Components of the C
POP-1 and Anterior–Posterior Fate Decisions in C. elegans Embryos
Naoki Hisamoto, Chun Li, Motoki Yoshida, Kunihiro Matsumoto 
Lateral Signaling Mediated by Axon Contact and Calcium Entry Regulates Asymmetric Odorant Receptor Expression in C. elegans  Emily R. Troemel, Alvaro.
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Opposing Wnt Pathways Orient Cell Polarity during Organogenesis
Anchor Cell Invasion into the Vulval Epithelium in C. elegans
The Noncanonical Binding Site of the MED-1 GATA Factor Defines Differentially Regulated Target Genes in the C. elegans Mesendoderm  Gina Broitman-Maduro,
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Developmental Cell 
Global Transcriptional Repression in C
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Kang Shen, Richard D Fetter, Cornelia I Bargmann  Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Hitoshi Sawa, Hiroko Kouike, Hideyuki Okano  Molecular Cell 
The C. elegans evl-20 Gene Is a Homolog of the Small GTPase ARL2 and Regulates Cytoskeleton Dynamics during Cytokinesis and Morphogenesis  Igor Antoshechkin,
Tyson J. Edwards, Marc Hammarlund  Cell Reports 
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
Katie S Kindt, Tobey Tam, Shaleah Whiteman, William R Schafer 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
The ced-8 Gene Controls the Timing of Programmed Cell Deaths in C
Guidance Cues at the Drosophila CNS Midline: Identification and Characterization of Two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 Homologs  Robin Harris, Laura Moore Sabatelli,
The CMK-1 CaMKI and the TAX-4 Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel Regulate Thermosensory Neuron Gene Expression and Function in C. elegans  John S. Satterlee,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Hulusi Cinar, Sunduz Keles, Yishi Jin  Current Biology 
Peter Swoboda, Haskell T. Adler, James H. Thomas  Molecular Cell 
Maria E. Gallegos, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Neuron 
Asymmetric Segregation of PIE-1 in C
The C. elegans evl-20 Gene Is a Homolog of the Small GTPase ARL2 and Regulates Cytoskeleton Dynamics during Cytokinesis and Morphogenesis  Igor Antoshechkin,
Fig. 5. EGL-20 inhibits anterior and posterior orientation of UNC-40 asymmetric localization and the formation of axons from these sites.(A–D) HSN neurons.
Christopher C. Quinn, Douglas S. Pfeil, William G. Wadsworth 
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Developmental Timing in C
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Role of a New Rho Family Member in Cell Migration and Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Ilan D Zipkin, Rachel M Kindt, Cynthia J Kenyon  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 883-894 (September 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0

Figure 1 MIG-2 Sequence Analysis (A) Alignment of the predicted MIG-2 protein sequence with other members of the Rho family. Residues identical in most members are shaded. Note that MIG-2 shares sequence identity in regions conserved across the family and diverges over amino acids 135 to 148. Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Dd, Dictyostelium discoideum; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Hs, Homo sapiens; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (B) Alignment dendrogram generated using the CLUSTAL algorithm. MIG-2 is more closely related to Rac and Cdc42 than it is to Rho, yet it has diverged sufficiently to define a novel subclass. (C) Sequence of MIG-2 showing functional domains (shaded) and location and sequence of mutations (asterisks). The position in MIG-2 equivalent to a loss-of-function mutation in let-60 ras (see text) is marked with a double cross. Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 2 Localization of mig-2::GFP (A) mig-2::GFP is expressed in many cells. All animals are wild-type except (iv), and all pictures were taken with a confocal microscope except (ii). Anterior is to the left and ventral is down in all panels. (i) Comma-stage (∼400 min) embryo. Nearly all cells express the fusion protein, which localizes to the plasma membrane (outlined cells). (ii) L2 animal showing QR descendants (AVM and SDQR), ALM, CAN, and HSN. (iii) Confocal image of AVM, SDQR, and ALM showing plasma membrane localization. (iv) AVM and SDQR displaced posteriorly and paired ventrally in a mig-2(rh17) animal. Note that plasma membrane localization does not change though the cells are displaced. ALM is in its normal position. (v) L3 animal showing the developing vulval epithelium and the anchor cell (AC), which exhibits cytoplasmic staining. (vi) Distal tip cell (DTC; also showing cytoplasmic localization) of the developing gonad in an L3 animal. The distal tip cell is leading the dorsal and anterior turn of this posterior gonad arm. (vii) V cells (lateral epidermis) showing apical plasma membrane localization. (B) Confocal localization of mig-2::GFP in migrating cells in wild-type animals. In each panel, anterior is to the left and is the direction of migration. (i) QR as it migrates over V4. Note the leading edge protruding anteriorly (arrowhead). mig-2::GFP is uniformly localized around the cell periphery. (ii–iv) The daughters of QR, QR.a and QR.p, migrate anteriorly and also exhibit a lamella-like leading edge (arrowheads). (v) After the divisions of QR.a and QR.p, QR.aa and QR.pp undergo cell death (round cells) while QR.ap and QR.pa continue to migrate anteriorly and correspondingly show the leading edge morphology (arrowheads). QR.ap has migrated past its anterior sister cell QR.aa. mig-2::GFP continues to be localized around the cell periphery (with some cytoplasmic staining) in migratory cells. (C) Cell types expressing mig-2::GFP in animals of different developmental stages. Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 3 Cell Migration Defects in Animals Carrying Activating and Null mig-2 Mutations (A) Schematic diagram illustrating many of the cell migrations affected by activating mutations in mig-2. Cells are drawn in their final wild-type positions with arrows denoting the path of migration. Embryonic migrations take place before complete elongation; thus, actual migrations are shorter than depicted. (B) Histogram of wild-type and mutant cell positions for CAN, HSN, ALM, and the QR cell descendants AVM and SDQR (n = 200 for each cell type). Representative cell positions are shown for wild type (N2, top panels), the activated allele mig-2(rh17) (middle panels), and the null allele mig-2(mu28) (bottom panels). Positional values are shown relative to the axis of the worms in (A). A number of cells are affected in rh17 animals, whereas only the Q descendants AVM and SDQR and the coelomocytes (data not shown) are affected in mu28 animals (see Table 1 and Table 2). Note that the affected cells migrate to more variable positions in the mutants than in wild type. Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 4 Abnormal HSN Axon Guidance Caused by Activating mig-2 Mutations (A) HSN axons in animals carrying activated mig-2 alleles visualized with anti-serotonin immunofluorescence (McIntire et al. 1992; see Experimental Procedures). Anterior is to the left and ventral is down, and axons are delineated by arrowheads. The first panel shows schematic drawings of normal (WT) and misguided HSN axon outgrowth. (i) Confocal compiled Z series showing the wild-type HSN axon projection. The cell body sends an axon ventrally to the ventral nerve cord then anteriorly over the vulva where several synapses are made and on to the head (out of picture). (ii) Conventional fluorescence microscopy image of a wild-type HSN axon. (iii) Dorsally displaced cell body in mig-2(rh17) whose axon fails to project to the ventral cord and instead turns anteriorly and runs along the lateral body wall. (iv–vi) Misguided axons in mig-2(rh17). (vii) Misguided axon in mig-2 (gm38). (B) HSN axon guidance phenotypes categorized for each strain examined. “Truncated” indicates a shortened axon. “Anterior lateral” refers to the phenotype described in (Aiii), above. “Misguided” indicates a variable looping and/or wandering trajectory, with or without a projection to the ventral nerve cord (seen in Aiv–Avi). These axons can travel in any direction along the lateral body wall and often cross their own path. Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 5 Activated MIG-2::GFP under Control of the egl-5 Promoter Can Induce HSN Axon Wandering Representative HSN axon from lines carrying activated MIG-2::GFP under the control of the egl-5 promoter. Anterior is to the left and ventral is down. The cell body is marked with an asterisk. The wild-type axon path is shown by a white dotted line descending ventrally from the cell body to the ventral cord, circling the vulva, and reentering the cord to proceed anteriorly. egl-5 is a Hox gene expressed in posterior cells and in the HSN, which migrates from the posterior body region into the midbody region during embryogenesis. In larvae, the HSN continues to express egl-5::lacZ (Wang et al. 1993). The egl-5:MIG-2::GFP fusion was expressed, as expected, in posterior cells and in the HSN, which migrated to its wild-type position in approximately 60% of the animals. In addition, the processes of several posterior neurons that extend anteriorly in the ventral cord expressed MIG-2::GFP. These neurons are not required for ventral HSN axon outgrowth in the wild type (seeGarriga et al. 1993), and they are relatively far from the laterally located HSN cell body and from the wandering axons in many affected animals. GFP staining began to fade during L3/L4, so we visualized the axons using anti-serotonin antibodies (see Experimental Procedures). Of those animals in which the HSN cell body had migrated to its approximate wild-type position in the midbody region, 11% (n = 80) exhibited a range of looping and wandering axon phenotypes similar to those seen in mig-2(rh17) animals. No aberrant axons were observed in animals carrying wild-type MIG-2::GFP under the control of the egl-5 promoter (n = 83; see Experimental Procedures). Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 6 Migrations of Cells in the QR Lineage in Wild-Type and mig-2 Null Mutants (A) Lineage of the QR cell (left; X indicates cell death) and schematic drawing of lineage in wild type (N2) and mig-2(mu28). Anterior is to the left, and symbols indicate the position at which each cell divides or stops migrating. (B) Time course of the migration of QR and its descendants in N2 (wild type) and mig-2 (mu28) animals. Positional values correspond to the scale in (A). Note that the cell cycle timing of this lineage is wild-type in mu28, although the rate of migration is slower. Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)

Figure 7 Migrations of the P Cell Nuclei Are Blocked in unc-73; mig-2 Double Mutants Nomarski images of wild-type and double-mutant animals. (A) Ventral cord of a wild-type L2-stage animal. Intestinal nuclei are indicated with arrowheads. The P cell nuclei have descended from the sides of the animal (shown in [B]) into the ventral cord and have divided, giving rise to four neurons and one epidermal Pn.p cell. Neurons are marked with small arrows, and the epidermal descendant is marked with one large arrow for one set of P-derived cells. (C) An unc-73(e936); mig-2(mu28) L2-stage animal. In these animals, the P nuclei fail to migrate, and the P cell descendants (marked with arrows as in [A]) are found laterally, in the same focal plane as the lateral V cell nuclei (V5 and V6 descendants are marked with asterisks). Cell 1997 90, 883-894DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80353-0)