Building Family-Focused Policy: The Family Impact Toolkit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Bridging Race, Income and Cultural Differences to Support Student Success.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
INEE Conflict Sensitive Education Pack Photo by Stacy Hughes ©
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Lucila Beato UNMIL/HRPS
EstándAres Claves para Líderes Educativos publicados por The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortion Standards (ISLLC) desarrollados por The Council.
Practicing Community-engaged Research Mary Anne McDonald, MA, Dr PH Duke Center for Community Research Duke Translational Medicine Institute Division of.
Oronde Miller Casey Family Programs
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Competency Assessment Public Health Professional (2012)-
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Family-School-Community Partnering for Student Success
Best Practice Guidelines for Mental Health Promotion Programs: Older Persons 55+ Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Centre for Health Promotion, University.
Critical Resources to Support School and Community Partnerships: The School Counselor’s Role Sabri Dogan, Doctoral Student, OSU David Julian, Ph.D., OSU.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Values and Ethics EDU 131 Constitution Day 15 Sept 2006.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
CRPD: Research Rosemary Kayess Social Policy Research Centre UNSW.
Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
USING THE CGPL TO EXAMINE POLICY DOCUMENTS: A RESEARCHER’S PERSPECTIVE L. Funk, Toronto Caregiver Symposium, March 15 th and 16 th, 2012.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
Environmental Management System Definitions
The China Biodiversity Partnership And Framework for Action (CBPF) A Programmatic Approach for Biodiversity Conservation.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
INEE Guidance Note on Conflict Sensitive Education Location, Date, 2013.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Community BASED Policing/ ADELIN+JANNU. Structure Of Presentation Introduction for Community Based Policing Four basic principles of Community Based Policing.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Managing Corporate Reputation Sarah Williams Senior Examiner December 2013 / March 2014 Assignment Brief.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
Principles of Good Governance
Diversity and ECE.
Community Based Participatory Research
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Health Education THeories
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
E. Mahan Cultural Competency Prof. Ozcan Spring 2006
Advancing Race Equity and Inclusion Annie E. Casey Foundation
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
Human Resources Competency Framework
The Organizational Context
Module 2 Competency 1: Discuss disability models across the lifespan
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
How Current Policy Issues Can Benefit from the Family Impact Lens
Defining Family Policy: An Identify of Its Own
Chapter 4 © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014
Understanding a Skills-Based Approach
Chapter 13 Building Evidence-Based Family Policy:
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Families as a Legitimate Focus of Public Policy: Yesterday and Today
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
Community Engagement and Participation
Making Family Policy Matter: Moving from Analysis to Action
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Presentation transcript:

Building Family-Focused Policy: The Family Impact Toolkit Chapter 12 © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Building Family-Focused Policy: The Family Impact Toolkit

© Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Chapter 12 Outline Prioritizing the Family Impact Lens in Policy and Practice Applying the Family Impact Lens Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens Ecological Family Systems; Self-Efficacy; Open Policy Windows The Five Family Impact Principles Family Responsibility, Family Stability, Family Relationships, Family Diversity, Family Engagement Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens Family Impact Discussion Starters; Family Impact Checklists; Family Impact Analysis Selected Tips for Conducting Family Impact Analysis Resources Available in the Family Impact Toolkit Summary

Prioritizing the Family Impact Lens in Policy and Practice © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Prioritizing the Family Impact Lens in Policy and Practice It is one thing to endorse the importance of families to a strong society; it is quite another to systematically place families at the center of policy and practice. What is needed is to shift the rhetoric from appreciating families to prioritizing them as worthy of study, investment, partnership, and political action. When economic questions arise, economists are routinely consulted for data and research to assess economic impact. When family questions arise, family scientists should be routinely consulted for family data and research to assess how the proposed action affects family functioning.

Applying the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Applying the Family Impact Lens When policies or programs are under consideration, the family impact lens raises the questions of: how families are affected by the issue, in what ways, if any, families contribute to the issue, and whether involving families in the response would result in more effective and efficient policies and programs. When policies or programs are being implemented, the family impact lens ensures consideration of: practices that treat families with dignity and respect, information sharing so families can make informed decisions, family choice regarding available services and the extent of participation, and family involvement in collaborations and decisionmaking.

Applying the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Applying the Family Impact Lens

Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens Ecological family systems theory frames the impetus for the family impact lens. The theory combines Bronfenbrenner’s concentric nested circles representing multiple influences on human development, and Minuchin’s structural family systems theory describing the role of families in development. Families are the foremost influence on individual development; policies and programs shape the environment in which families operate, which can strengthen or undermine family functioning. Organizational processes in families can promote the psychosocial development and protection of family members, and help members adapt to changing cultural, economic, and social contexts.

Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens Self-efficacy theory provides the rationale and core components for supporting autonomous family functioning. Policies and practices that build self-efficacy, through relational and participatory practices, promote family responsibility and build capacity to prevent problems in family functioning.

Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Theoretical Rationale for the Family Impact Lens The open policy windows theoretical framework guides the methodology for the family impact lens. Different policy actors (e.g., elected officials, their staff, policy analysts, agency officials, and academics) all play unique roles in policymaking, and require distinct methods for applying the family impact lens at different points in the policy process. Policy windows open when problems are recognized, policy solutions are available, and the political climate supports change.

The Five Family Impact Principles © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 The Five Family Impact Principles Family Responsibility Policy and practice should support and empower the functions of families (family formation, partner relationships, economic support, child rearing, and caregiving) and avoid supplanting the role of families. Family Stability Policy and practice should reinforce healthy family commitments and incorporate prevention strategies to avert crises and chronic situations that cause instability. Family Relationships Policy and practice should acknowledge that family ties, both positive and negative, are powerful and persistent, and should promote healthy relationship skill building.

The Five Family Impact Principles © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 The Five Family Impact Principles Family Diversity Policies and programs should examine whether there are disparate impacts on families depending on varying characteristics and circumstances (e.g., culture, ethnicity, family structure, geography, life stage, race, religion, SES, special needs); consider what factors contribute to any disparities; and identify how they could be addressed. Family Engagement Family-centered approaches, including relational and participatory practices, should be systematically identified, verified, and incorporated into organizational philosophy, culture, and practice.

Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens The Family Impact Discussion Starters direct policymakers to ask, how will policies, programs, or practices: support rather than substitute for family members’ responsibilities to one another? reinforce family members’ commitment to each other and to the stability of the family unit? recognize the power and persistence of family ties, and promote healthy couple, marital, and parental relationships? acknowledge and respect the diversity of family life (e.g., different cultural, ethnic, racial, and religious backgrounds; various geographic locations and socioeconomic statuses; families with members who have special needs; and families at different stages of the life cycle)? engage and work in partnership with families?

Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens The Family Impact Checklist expands on each of the five family impact principles with a set of 33 detailed questions that can be used to further guide policy, program, and practice decisions. For example:

Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens Family Impact Analysis (FIA) is a formal, in-depth methodology that uses the checklist to fully examine the extent to which rules, legislation, laws, programs, agencies, or organizations are supportive of families. Family impact analysis is distinct from evaluation: Evaluation focuses on whether policy/program goals are met, whereas FIA examines whether the goals or efforts to achieve them have intended or unintended consequences for families. Conducting family impact analysis generally requires both expertise from family scientists who understand family functioning, and input from policy analysts or program staff who understand the specifics of a policy, program, agency, or organization.

Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Methods for Operationalizing the Family Impact Lens Family Impact Analysis has four general steps: Select the policy, program, or organization to assess. Determine which family types might be affected. Select the appropriate family impact checklist, identify the relevant principles and questions, and determine the family impacts for each. Interpret, disseminate, and apply the results. Different protocols have been developed for: conducting a family impact analysis of rules, legislation, laws, or programs conducting a family impact analysis of an agency or organization using a quantitative checklist supplemented with stakeholder discussion.

Selected Tips for Conducting Family Impact Analysis © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Selected Tips for Conducting Family Impact Analysis Some principles will conflict; decisions about which principles or questions to value more highly should be left to decisionmakers. Family impact analysis is meant to be nonpartisan; the intent is not to establish support or opposition for a policy or program, but to raise several, often competing, considerations that stakeholders may want to factor into their decisions. The analysis must be a high-quality, rigorous examination that presents both how families are and are not supported; it should provide implications for families, but not recommendations. Family impact analysis is focused on action. Work to develop next steps for discussing and disseminating the results and for assessing the implementation and impact of any actions taken.

Resources Available in the Family Impact Toolkit © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Resources Available in the Family Impact Toolkit

© Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014 Summary This chapter provides a theoretical rationale and concrete procedures for applying the family impact lens to policies, programs, and practices. Previous attempts to assess the family impact of policies and programs may have been limited by political, procedural, and philosophical factors. The broader, more comprehensive concept of the family impact lens, with different methodologies for applying it in different situations, attempts to address some of these limitations. More research is needed to examine the effectiveness of the family impact lens, and the reliability and validity of the family impact checklists.