Mode selectable switch

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Explanation about three ways to obtain CD emissions in the present GTR and a proposal for the amendment E-Lab group WLTP-07-16e.
Advertisements

WLTP-07-17e WLTP GTR 15.
Flow chart A,B EMW Test 1 R EMW1 > L Rejected Yes R EMW1 > 0.9 L EMW Test 2 * R EMW2 > L Yes Accepted No EMW : typically tested by TVH with emission worst.
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Amgad Elgowainy, Andy Burnham, Michael Wang, John Molburg, and.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests WLTP IWG at Geneva in June JAPAN WLTP-11-20e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Final??? Review of WLTP Definitions Bill Coleman – Tokyo Sept./Oct WLTP-12-20e.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP, result calculation, v6
WLTP 6th DTP Meeting Geneva DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Parameter Setting for Validation 2 DTP Subgroup Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-034 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests at WLTP Tokyo IWG in 2015 JAPAN WLTP-12-15e.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
IEEE Vehicle Power and propulsion conference, p.p. 1-4, Sept Control strategies for fuel cell based hybrid electric vehicles: From offline to online.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Combined Approach for electrified vehicles Due to its technical difficulty and time shortage, it was agreed to take care of applicability of “combined.
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
By: Justin Avery, Joseph James
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
WLTP-14-15e Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-14-15e) 14th WLTP IWG 26 April 2016.
WLTP-11-10e Summary of GTR-relevant text from the April 2015 IWG #10 and Drafting Subgroup meetings, Stockholm, plus new slides since then March 22, 2015.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
Summary of all slides reviewed during the March 2015 Drafting Subgroup meeting, Brussels and new slides since then March 22, 2015.
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
WLTP-SG-Drafting-03-03e-Working slides
الجزء الثالث دراسة السوق.
R101 amendment Proposal from German
Flow chart A,B x % shall be discussed. Less than 4%.
Open issues 3 bis12, 20, 25, 26 bis, 30, 31 and 33 O.I. 12 (EV) :
WLTP Annex 8: OVC-HEV:
Positions on open points WLTP DTP subgroup LabProcICE
Full load curve proposal
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
Submitted by the expert from OICA
ACEA Comments from ACEA still does not understand the reasoning for this proposal. This proposal increases the test burden disproportionally.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Interpolation family criteria OVC-HEV and NOVC-HEV (new proposal)
test limits for correction coefficient determination
Fuel Cell Vehicles - Required corrections in xxx-2016
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
1. Summary # items RESULTS status remarks EV_1 HEV system power
Vehicle classification for Electrified vehicle
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Full load curve proposal
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-11e
COP procedure for Europe
(under discussion in Phase 2)
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Analysis for WLTP UF development
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
Japanese position Emission compliance In each cycle
E-lab group’s suggestion for the development of Utility Factors
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Presentation transcript:

Mode selectable switch

PEV: Mode selectable switch (in case of predominant) Yes PEV: Is there a predominant mode? No PEV: Downscaling applicable? Does the predominant mode enable the vehicle to follow the applicable test cycle? Yes, if f_dsc > 0 Yes No, if f_dsc = 0 No Downscaling of the driving cycle (input parameter: vehicle mass, peak power of the electric machine according to UN ECE R85) Number of modes which enable the vehicle to follow the applicable test cycle? Select the predominant mode Applicable test cycle Only one mode Several modes No mode Select this one mode Select the mode with the highest electric energy consumption Is there an identical speed cap for all modes? (evidence shall be given to the responsible authority) Yes No Is there a predominant mode? Yes No Select the mode with the highest electric energy consumption Select the predominant mode

OVC-HEV: CD Type 1 Test – Mode selectable switch (in case of predominant) Yes OVC-HEV in CD: Is there a predominant mode? No Does the predominant mode enable the vehicle to follow driving cycle under charge depleting conditions? Yes No Select predominant mode Amount of modes which enable the vehicle to follow the driving cycle? Only one mode No mode Several modes Identify the mode with the highest cycle energy demand (according to Annex 7, paragraph 5 where the target speed is replaced by the actual speed) Select the mode with the highest electric energy consumption Select this one mode Drive city cycle test Select the mode with highest electric energy consumption Select the mode with the highest cycle energy demand Regional option

NOVC-HEV and OVC-HEV in CS: OVC-HEV: CS Type 1 Test – Mode selectable switch (in case of predominant) Yes NOVC-HEV and OVC-HEV in CS: Is there a predominant mode? No Yes Does the predominant mode enable the vehicle to follow the driving cycle under charge sustaining conditions? No Select predominant mode Amount of modes which enable the vehicle to follow the driving cycle? Only one mode Several modes No mode Select this one mode Identify the mode with the highest cycle energy demand (according to Annex 7, paragraph 5 where the target speed is replaced by the actual speed) Average test results in the best case mode and worst case mode. Best and worst case modes shall be identified by the evidence provided on the CO2 emissions and fuel consumption in all modes (analog Annex 6, paragraph 1.2.6.5.2.4.) Select the worst case mode Select the mode with the highest cycle energy demand