Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process © 2011 National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate without permission.
Advertisements

Through Instructional Rounds
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Texas Evaluation and Support System
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process Day 1 © 2011 National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate without permission.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at Questioning.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Identifying Assessments
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Middle School Teacher Overview
Elementary Teacher Overview
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
High School Teacher Overview
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
T-TESS and District Connections
SOUTH CAROLINA TEACHING STANDARDS 4.0 TEACHER TRAINING
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 10
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
MNPS Institute Working with Partners July 13-14, 2017
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Co-Teaching and Collaborative Planning
Assessment and Instructional Planning
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 11
Lead Evaluator Training
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Overview of the Intent of the Iowa Core Curriculum
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Say: Welcome to today’s professional learning session on inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability is essential to the teacher evaluation process.
Implementing Race to the Top
Lead Evaluator Training
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
*Note to facilitator—prior to conducting this learning session, it is strongly advised that you have watched and scripted the video less and thoroughly.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Individually page 3 handout
Presentation transcript:

Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Elementary Teacher Overview Note: Trainer notes are included in this section and are also provided in the ‘Trainer Notes’ handout. “Welcome…. The purpose for us meeting today is to collectively learn about the new Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System…. also know as T-TESS. Our time together is intended to ensure that every one of you (teachers) has a clear understanding about the new system and how it will support all of us in learning and growing as a school community, to ultimately impact our students’ performance.”

What are your favorite hobbies? Elements of an Effective Lesson Placemat Consensus Consensus Elements Consensus Map: Need chart paper to complete these. “We will be working together to create team Consensus Maps. We will need four teachers per chart. I’ll model the process before you complete your consensus map.” (See next slide.) What are your favorite hobbies?

What are your favorite hobbies? Elements of an Effective Lesson Placemat Consensus Person A: Basketball Soccer Gardening Reading Scrapbooking Person B: Gardening Camping Basketball Soccer Reading Basketball Gardening Reading Person D: Woodworking Basketball Reading Gardening Collecting Cards Person C: Coin collecting Interior Designing Basketball Gardening Reading “You will be working in teams of four. Assume this team was asked to identify their favorite hobbies. Each person individually listed their hobbies in the space provided. --the consensus elements (Basketball, Gardening and Reading) are written in the middle, since everyone had these.” We should have four teachers per chart (last team may have less if there are not enough teachers). Each person will take one section of the map to write your responses. Use a different color for each section. …Are we ready?” See next slide. These consensus maps will be posted and referred to consistently throughout the training. What are your favorite hobbies?

Placemat Consensus – 10 Minutes Total! 1 minute to write individually 3 minutes to talk and reach consensus Participant A Participant B Consensus Elements 5 minutes to debrief Participant D Participant C ‘You will have 10 minutes total to complete the activity…. 2 minutes to write individually,… 3 minutes to talk and reach consensus…. And 5 minutes to debrief.” “The prompt is as follows: (read the prompt from the slide)….” Monitor and provide feedback. Debrief: “As I walked around the room, it was clear that there were many comments which were seen on multiple charts. Let’s debrief what is in each team’s consensus section…. “ Once each team has shared, follow with two questions for the teachers… Why this question?: We want all participants to think about what they believe to be effective teaching….this should be the basis of their understanding of the rubric. Why this way?: (Why did we process this way?) We want to show them that in order for there to be a shared understanding of what good teaching is, they all have to come to a consensus on what that would look like…the rubric will help to formalize this. As you reflect upon a recent lesson you observed that was effective, what occurred during that lesson that led it to be effective?

Effective Elements Summary Rigorous and measureable goals aligned to state content standards Student engagement and interaction Alignment of activities and materials throughout lesson Student relevancy Teacher displays content knowledge Numerous checks for mastery Teacher asks probing questions to extend learning Evidence of student mastery of the objective Differentiation Make connections to: “When a lesson is effective, we know it when we see it. But, when “it” is missing key elements, how do we communicate what is missing to someone else? How do we build the missing skills in others? How do we measure “it”? T-TESS provides us with what “it” is (i.e. what an effective lesson, effective teaching is), the process for building the skills in others, and the tools by which we measure it (T-TESS rubric and the correlating pieces). There are many effective elements of a good lesson. The goal is creating instructional opportunities, or lessons, where the dimensions come together at higher performance levels.

T-TESS Rubric Overview Standards and Alignment Data and Assessment Knowledge of Students Activities Planning Achieving Expectations Content Knowledge and Expertise Communication Differentiation Monitor and Adjust Instruction Classroom Environment, Routines, and Procedures Managing Student Behavior Classroom Culture Learning Environment Professional Demeanor and Ethics Goal Setting Professional Development School Community Involvement Professional Practices and Responsibilities “The T-TESS Rubric includes four broad categories, or Domains, and 16 Dimensions.” Read each domain and the bulleted dimensions.

Rubric Activity Directions: Handout Directions: Each group will use the dimensions 2.1 Achieving Expectations and 3.1 Classroom Environment, Routines, and Procedures from the instruction domain to highlight using the same process. You will have 10 minutes to highlight and discuss with a partner, and 10 minutes to discuss with your group. Note: See below and in trainer manual. You have been given a template for which indicators need to be grouped together in 3’s. Depending on the size of the large group, you can use all or some of these. “We will now move to the ‘We do’… each table will be assigned three dimensions to highlight the key terms in the dimension (summary paragraph at the top) and the descriptors. Are there questions about the process at this point?” Assign dimensions to each table as follows…   Two dimensions from Instruction and one dimension from the Learning Environment: Differentiation (2.4) /Monitor and Adjust (2.5)/ Managing Student Behavior (3.2) Achieving Expectations (2.1)/ Content Knowledge and Expertise (2.2)/ Classroom Environment, Routines and Procedures (3.1) Achieving Expectations (2.1)/ Content Knowledge and Expertise (2.2)/ Classroom Culture (3.3) Differentiation (2.4)/Monitor and Adjust (2.5)/ Classroom Environment, Routines and Procedures (3.1)

Look Back at Your Consensus Maps… Find the parts of the rubric that correspond to your consensus maps. For example—If you wrote “there should be a clear objective,” where in the rubric would that be found? Place the abbreviation of the dimensions on the placemat consensus on the wall. Take 5 minutes to discuss the connections between what you said needed to happen in a effective lesson, and what the dimensions define as effective instruction. Participants need to physically go back to their consensus maps and label where the 3 indicators they highlighted exist within that map. In other words, they will review the ‘consensus circle’ and label the correlating dimension, e.g., differentiated instruction = 2.4. The answer to the above question would be the Standards and Alignment indicator. Trainer should ask teachers to make connections beyond just the 3 dimensions that they highlighted but they should branch out to the whole rubric and look at different dimensions that they will label on their consensus maps based upon what they wrote during that activity.

Thanks for Your Participation…! “Thank you…” Connect to your district/school goals and outcomes for student achievement…