Publics and Counterpublics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Student’s Guide to Methodology
Advertisements

Descartes God.
Gallup Q12 Definitions Notes to Managers
The Anthropology of Performance. ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDIES OF EXPRESSIVE CULTURE All types/forms of expressive culture informal & formal forms “function"
Johannine Literature/ 1 John 5 1 Prayer, Sin and Victory Looking at 1 John 5.
T HE CHALLENGE OF A E UROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE : D ELIBERATION AND THE ROLE OF ICT S. Dr. Georgios Papanagnou.
Discourse Analysis Force Migration and Refugee Studies Program The American University in Cairo Professor Robert S. Williams.
Interpreting the play Man and nature Man and society
Argumentative Writing. Elements of an Argumentative Essay  Introduction:  Attention-getter  Background Information  Thesis Statement  Supporting.
My Ego Created Identity (32 slides) creatively compiled by dr. michael farnworth.
Grounded theory, discourse analysis and hermeneutics Part Two – Discourse Analysis ERPM001 Interpretive Methodologies Dr Alexandra Allan.
Purpose of Deliberative Issues Forums  Provide safe spaces for public discourse on complex issues  Encourage conversation that identifies underlying.
LEADERSHIP 101: Styles of Leadership ….Empowering Africans to Succeed 1 Kenneth Onyewuchi E&F Management Consult, Abuja Nigeria
Consumer Directed Care Would you like fries with that? Angie Robinson September 2014.
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH – WHAT DO WE THINK IT’S GOOD FOR? ELANA JORAM CET – APRIL 6, 2016.
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
Professor Sally Varnham (UTS)
عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد
Ethical theories and approaches in Business
Learning-centred Leadership
IN: *Tuesdays and *Thursdays.
Carl Schmitt and political institutions
RESEARCH ON OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS OF PEER EDUCATION IN TUSCANY
Self-Esteem & Self Concept
Interpreting the play Man and nature Man and society
RESEARCH METHODS LECTURE 42
Analysing texts FUNCTION R. JAKOBSON.
Learning Goal Readers will understand and learn to apply Signpost Strategies to a short story Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an.
Principles of Government and Politics
Complex Information for Problem Solving
Purpose of Deliberative Issues Forums
Taking Informed Action
Dr. Holly Kruse Communication Theory
Speeches 9 TRIV.
Advanced Higher Modern Languages:
The Question Concerning Public
Supported Decision Making Evolution of an idea and Canadian experience Michael Bach Canadian Association for Community Living March 26,
Questions 2 and 3 Identification and Analysis
Welcome to The Open Session* Renée Johnson and Alex Gatley
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Rhetorical Appeals and related things.
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Sequencing Writing Assignments
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Intercultural Communication
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
What is the difference between: Can you give an example of each?
The Public Policy Process
Aha Moments Last week we talked about Aha moments. When you’re reading, authors often give you clues that the character has come to an important understanding.
Dignity In Care “Compassion, kindness and respect are the very essence of dignified care. We must make sure that these principles are at the heart of.
4.5.1 Human sexuality: Sexuality and the idea of sexual rights
Five preliminary strategies for understanding and appreciating poetry.
Intersections And Identity
What is Rhetoric? Lesson 1.
4.5.1 Human sexuality: Sexuality and the idea of sexual rights
A day in the life of Nursery
Modern stylistics Analysis
Seminar “a form of academic instruction which has the function of bringing together medium- sized groups for recurring meetings, focusing each time on.
Teaming and Collaboration
Listening For Accountable Talk
Participating American Citizens
PowerPoint Summary of:
Socratic Seminars.
democracy DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY Matt Bennett
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
Stages of Development Viktor Lowenfeld Creative and Mental Growth
The Logic of The Third Man
4.5.1 Human sexuality: Sexuality and the idea of sexual rights
Cultural Humility & Strategies for Survival
Presentation transcript:

Publics and Counterpublics Michael Warner Publics and Counterpublics

1) A public is self organized Publics exist “only by virtue of being addressed” (50) Publics are organized through discourse (oral or text-based communication) “independently of state institutions, law, formal frameworks of citizenship, or preexisting institutions such as the church” (51) The idea of the public as “the people”—exists only because “it is really a public of discourse. It is self-creating and self-organized, and herein lies its power as well as its elusive strangeness” (52)

2) A public is a relation among strangers A public “unites strangers through participation alone…[who] come into relationship by its means, though the resulting social relationship might be peculiarly indirect and unspecifiable” (56) Not so much “people-whom-one-does-not-yet-know,” but “an environment of strangerhood” and a “necessary medium of commonality” (57).

3) The address of public speech is both personal and impersonal “With public speech…we might recognize ourselves as addressees, but it is equally important that we remember that the speech was addressed to indefinite others; that in singling us out, it does so not on the basis of our concrete identity, but by virtue of our participation in the discourse alone, and therefore in common with strangers” (58) “To address a public, we don’t go around saying the same thing to all these people. We say it in a venue of indefinite address and hope that people will find themselves in it” (59)

4) A public is constituted through mere attention “the act of attention involved in showing up is enough to create an addressable public” (61) “publics…lacking any institutional being, commence with the moment of attention” and “must continually predicate renewed attention, and cease to exist when attention is no longer predicated” (61) Not timeless: exist only by “active participation rather than ascriptive belonging” (62)

5) A public is the social space created by the reflexive circulation of discourse Not just one speech act or text makes a public. A public is an “ongoing space of encounter,” with other texts (62) “Anything that addresses a public is meant to undergo circulation” (64) “In order for a text to be public, we must recognize it not simply as a diffusion to strangers, but also as a temporality of circulation” (66). It is timely, contemporary., and “oriented toward the future” (66)

6) Publics act historically according to the temporalitiy of their circulation “A text, to have a public, must continue to circulate through time…through an intertextual environment of citation and implication” (68) “There is no moment at which the conversation stops and a decision ensues” (68)

Other ideas Public discourse is poetic: “All discourse or performance addressed to a public must characterize the world in which it attempts to circulate, projecting for that world a concrete and livable shape, and attempting to realize that world through address” (81)

Not persuasion but poesis “Public discourse says not only: ‘Let a public exist,’ but: ‘Let it have this character, speak this way, see the world in this way.’ It then goes out in search of confirmation that such a public exists, with greater or lesser success—success being further attempts to cite, circulate, and realize the world-understanding it articulates. Run it up the flagpole, and see who salutes. Put on a show and see who shows up” (82) Public discourse isn’t necessarily argument and debate and deliberation, but circulation of discourse—whether or not it is successful is how public arguments recreate that social world

Counterpublics Marked off from “any general or dominant public” (84) “A counterpublic maintains at some level, conscious or not, an awareness of its subordinate status” (86) Like general publics, it is addressed to strangers, but not just any strangers—counterpublics are addressed to people “marked by their participation in this kind of discourse; ordinary people are presumed to not want to be mistaken for the kind of person who would participate in this kind of talk or be present in this kind of scene” (86)