Ruslan Stefanov, Coordinator

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Excellence in public administration for competitiveness

Advertisements

Rhetoric and Realities: Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe Strategic Targeted Research Project EU 6 th Framework Programme Contract N°: CIT2-CT

The Roots of Corruption Eric M. Uslaner Department of Government and Politics University of Maryland--College Park College Park, MD USA

PEIP Project Tariff Policy for Water and Wastewater Services.

Income Inequality and Distributive Justice in Hong Kong and Mainland China: A Comparative Analysis Xiaogang WU Associate Professor of Social Science Hong.

Countering Corruption in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ruslan Stefanov and Denitza Mantcheva, Center for the Study of Democracy Sarajevo, June 2012.

Monitoring Implementation: Strategy and Program for Good Governance and Prevention and Countering Corruption ( ) Alexander Stoyanov Center for.

CORRUPTION AND GOVERNANCE Daniel Kaufmann Nonresident Senior Fellow Brookings Institution.

What is corruption and anti- corruption? Global perspectives on costs of corruption and anti-corruption approaches Jesper Johnsøn, U4.

CORRUPTION PREVENTION IN CIVIL SERVICE Case of Finland Astana Economic Forum, 21 May 2015 Anneli Temmes.

PRIVATE SECTOR APPROACHES TO FIGHTING CORRUPTION Ruslan Stefanov Coordinator of the Economic Program Center for the Study of Democracy, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Experience and Lessons of Utilizing National and EU Funds for Innovation in Bulgaria Enhancing Bulgaria’s Competitiveness through Innovation.

1 Robert Bylon Twesigye Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) 'Country-led Governance Assessments: Sharing Experiences and Increasing Political Accountability’

A Note on Corruption and Development ECON 3510, Carleton University June 12, 2014 A.Ritter Source: Class Notes.

Begin HSO Coursework RHP exercise check-in: examples from each group What is an organization What is an HSO Class exercises for Monday Case: Andrea Cunningham.

MENA-OECD Investment Programme Draft Policy Considerations on Incentives Working Group 3 Meeting Cairo, Egypt 6-7 September 2006.

 Subventions from state or commune  Assistance measures (run by western countries to support less developed countries)  Funds from budget of European.

Introducing and Implementing Anti-corruption Monitoring System in Bulgaria and in the SEE region International Conference “Cooperation of the National.

Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.

THE AUDIT BOARD OF INDONESIA. THE RESEARCH 1. Respondents 157 persons from 16 agencies : 8 government agencies, National Police Department, Attorney General.

The Future of Corruption Benchmarking in the EU European Union OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY The project is implemented with the financial.

Cutting Deficits Bulgarian Experience Petar Ganev, Bratislava, 2012.

Older workers and job creation Dr.E.Mestheneos Vice-President, AGE 50+Ellas.

Ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption in Lithuania A Review of the Compliance of the Lithuanian Legal and Institutional Framework.

Public Benefit Organizations in Hungary Nilda Bullain European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL)

1 EUROPEAN INNOVATION POLICY: Innovation policy: updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy Thursday, 9 October 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Transparency and Anti- Corruption in Bulgaria Mr. Stefan Sofianski, Mayor of Sofia, Former Prime-Minister of Bulgaria Presentation at MADAGASCAR GOVERNMENT.

Corruption in Transition: The Bulgarian Experience Partners in Transition II Sofia, September 2001.

THE POLICY OF THE BULGARIAN GOVERNMENT IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION Mr. Boyko Slavchev Head of Cabinet of the Minister of Interior Republic of Bulgaria.

SOCIAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION RATES AND THE SPLIT BETWEEN EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE BULGARIAN EXPERIECE PhD J. Hristoskov.

IFMIS, PEM, and Anti- corruption IFMIS, PEM, and Anti- corruption Bill Dorotinsky PREM Public Sector Governance Group April 21, 2005 Building ICT to Reduce.

Reducing the Hidden Economy in Bulgaria – Policies, Impact and Lessons Ruslan Stefanov Project Coordinator Federal City Council Washington D.C., April.

Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.

Informal Economy and Informal Labour in New Member States and Candidate Countries: The Case of Bulgaria Ruslan Stefanov, Center for the Study of Democracy.

Measuring and Monitoring Levels of Corruption in Bulgaria and South East Europe Methodology, Results and Public Impact.

Balkan Parliament 2005 Blagoevgrad, October 15, 2005 Corporate Governance as Antidote to Corruption Todor Yalamov Economic Program Center for the Study.

Indonesia in Perspective’s Study Case Corruption in IndonesiaCauses of CorruptionLesson Learned.

Enlargement of the Euro-area Competitiveness Issues: The Case of Bulgaria Ruslan Stefanov Center for the Study of Democracy Brussels, 9 December 2010.

Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy Establishing an IRC in Macedonia, Skopje, March 29, 2006 Ruslan Stefanov Economic Program Center.

Dr. Ole Döring, Tarrytown 2 Comparative Country Experience: „What about China?“ Horst-Görtz-Stiftungsinstitut, Bonhoefferweg 3a,

Government Failure AS Economics Unit 1. Aims and Objectives Aim: Understand government failure Objectives: Define government failure Assess different.

Monitoring and Measuring Levels of Corruption in Bulgaria and South East Europe.

CORRUPTION MONITORING SYSTEM METHODOLOGY & SURVEY RESULTS Martin Dimov Vitosha Research COALITION 2000.

CORRUPTION MONITORING SYSTEM METHODOLOGY & BASIC SURVEY RESULTS Martin Dimov Vitosha Research COALITION 2000.

Strategy and Program for Good Governance and Prevention and Countering Corruption ( ) Goals, Principles, Methods and System of Indicators.

Impact on businesses of government policy

Industry in Bulgaria And Romania: preliminary policy recommendations).

Fighting Corruption, EU Procurement and EU Subsidies Fraud in Belgium

Parliamentary openness / public trust?

Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy

Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.

Benchmarking Corruption in the EU: The Bulgarian Experience

INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.

Public – Private Partnerships in Bulgaria: First Steps

TACKLING THE INFORMAL ECONOMY AND UNDECLARED WORK IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE: KNOWLEDGE INFORMED POLICY RESPONSES ON THE EXAMPLE OF BULGARIA, CROATIA, AND FYR.

Policy Reform and Advocacy August 9, 2016 DR. JOHN SULLIVAN

Innovation.bg 2007 The Bulgarian Innovation System in the EU

Corruption in the UK Dr Robert Barrington, Executive Director

Coalition 2000 THE CORRUPTION MONITORING SYSTEM OF

Economic impact of corruption in the Bulgarian public procurement market and the role of EU financial support for improving governance Stefan Karaboev.

Small Cities Organized Risk Effort (SCORE) Target Funding Benchmarks

The Sub-Regional Integrity Conference (Almaty, Kazakhstan, January 2007) «Strategic methods of improving integrity in Customs» Global Forum V.

Reducing the Hidden Economy in Bulgaria – Policies, Impact and Lessons

Animal Welfare EU Strategy

Joining Efforts Against Impunity and Political Corruption:

The European Anti-Corruption Report

Development of IAS policy

Ruslan Stefanov, Coordinator

Transformation of the National Statistical System: Experience

Prof. Krastyo Petkov UNWE, Sofia, 2013

Presentation transcript:

SPREAD AND DYNAMICS OF CORRUPTION IN BULGARIA – THE BUSINESS SECTOR (JANUARY 2007) Ruslan Stefanov, Coordinator Economic Program, Center for the Study of Democracy

Corruption in Bulgaria – Overview on the Business Sector Corruption acceptability and susceptibility among the business Actual corrupt practices Overall indexes Corrupt practices in selected administrative services Attitudes towards corruption Overall index Corruption among selected professional groups Corruption-related expectations Attitudes towards the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies Conclusions www.vitosha-research.com

Acceptability and susceptibility to corruption (min=0, max=10) Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com Base: All respondents

Rate of actual corruption (min=0, max=10) Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com Base: All respondents

Relative share of the companies that have paid informally for the following services (%) Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com Base: All respondents

Spread of corruption (min=0 max=10) Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com Base: All respondents

Spread of corruption by occupational group (%) www.vitosha-research.com

Corruption-related expectations (min=0 max=10) Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com Base: All respondents

Assessments of the impact of government efforts to curb corruption* Source: Vitosha Research www.vitosha-research.com * Relative share of those who answered, “The Government does nothing”

Conclusions – what do indexes show? Actual corruption in the business – administration relations declines in th beginning of 2007. Business susceptibility to corruption also falls. Business attitudes towards the spread of corruption remain high though their composition/addressee changes The spread of corruption among the administration falls (customs, police, tax officials) Corruption rises/stays flat among the political elite (politicians, MPs, prosecutors) Corruption-related expectations stay at bay but the business doubts the government’s ability to tackle corruption, particularly political corruption www.vitosha-research.com

Conclusions – what do indexes suggest? It is possible that the current decline in actual corruption be temporary/seasonal – due to one-off factors. Acceptability of corruption remains high and rising among the business Now is the time for a breakthrough in good governance – measures should be targeted towards the higher political level and should encompass more complex schemes of corruption not just bribery (conflicts of interest, abuse of power, etc.) What gets measured – gets done: the System of Indicators is a powerful too for self-discipline, which can be used as a pilot model for an EU wide instrument. www.vitosha-research.com

Upcoming CSD reports Corruption assessment report 2007 – April 2007 Corruption in public procurement in Bulgaria: policy assessment – April 2007 Corruption in the Bulgarian Healthcare www.vitosha-research.com