Assessing Student Learning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.
Writing Effective Assessment Plans. Why Assessment Plans? Facilitates periodic, not episodic assessment of student learning and program outcomes Serves.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
The Academic Assessment Process
Writing Effective Assessment Plans Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment 101: Back-to-Basics An Introduction to Assessing Student Learning Outcomes.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Outcomes Assessment 101 Assessment Showcase 2009: Best Practices in the Assessment of Learning and Teaching February 11, 2009 Gwendolyn Johnson, Ph.D.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
CONVENING OF TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLANNING Tuesday, January 11, 2005 Denton, Texas.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Using WEAVEonline Jeanne Butler,
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Creating a Culture of Accountability and Assessment at an Urban Community College Diane B. Call, President Paul Marchese, VP Academic Affairs, Liza Larios,
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment to Administrative Services Mohawk Valley Community College February 7, 2006.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
Publisher to insert cover image here Chapter 9
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Student Affairs: A Culture of Assessment
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
The assessment process For Administrative units
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Consider Your Audience
The assessment process
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Finding/Creating Meaning in SLO Assessment
Student Affairs Assessment
Program Assessment: Student Learning Outcomes
Helping students know what they know
League for Innovation in the Community College March 29, 2010
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Creating Assessable Student Learning Outcomes
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze.
Rubrics for academic assessment
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Fort Valley State University
Elizabeth Crawford The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
planning THE ASSESSMENT CYCLE
Peralta Community Colleges: Environments of Effective Learning and Innovation. January 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Student Learning Planning, Implementing, Documenting Dr. Fredrik deBoer Brooklyn College

Look at how the definition of the activity also lays out the process: Begins with goals and mission High Standards then gathering analyzing and interpreting. (Note evidence) and the inclusion of document explain and improve

Why assess? Improvement – to use data gathered in the assessment process to make our institution function better External Accountability – evaluation by bodies such as CUNY, the state government, the accreditation agency, etc. Internal Accountability – evaluation as directed by leadership within Brooklyn College such as the President or the office of the Provost Transparency – an obligation as a public university to demonstrate to stakeholders like students, parents, and taxpayers that Brooklyn College is functioning as it should

Assessment is not… Assessment is not a new innovation in higher education. Faculty have always undertake assessment, such as when grading. Faculty already make changes in their courses based on their sense of how well students have learned the material; assessment allows such changes to be based on better information. Assessment is not administrators taking control away from faculty. The mission and student learning goals of a department must be decided by the faculty. Faculty must also decide what to assess, how to assess it, and what uses to make of assessment information. Administration and staff can help with planning, logistics, and reporting, but faculty ultimately decide what constitutes success or failure. Assessment is not used to evaluate individual students. It is not another way of gathering information to use to exclude students from the college, particular programs, or graduation. Assessment is not used to evaluate individual professors or to make personnel decisions.

Levels of assessment Institutional Program Classroom How is the institution functioning as a whole? What is the “bird’s eye view”? Program Are students in specific departments and programs satisfying the expectations of those departments and programs? Are goals and outcomes being met? Classroom How well are specific sections of courses succeeding according to their goals as laid out in the syllabus? Are students being adequately prepared to meet the requirements of the course?

Program Assessment Elements Mission Statement Goals/Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping and Assessment Cycle Tools for Assessing (Direct and Indirect) Closing the Loop

Methods Data Gathered in Regular Procedures Direct Indirect Graduation Rates, Enrollment, Time-to-Degree Direct Rubrics evaluating student work Multiple Choice Tests Indirect Surveys Focus Groups Interviews