Mucosal Impedance Discriminates GERD From Non-GERD Conditions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yang Tai, Huan Tong, Chengwei Tang  Gastroenterology 
Advertisements

Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Complications of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
The Esophageal Epithelial Barrier in Health and Disease
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for En Bloc Removal of Large Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors  Nikhil A. Kumta, Monica Saumoy, Amy.
Christoph Lübbert, Babett Holler  Gastroenterology 
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Michael F. Vaezi, David Katzka, Frank Zerbib 
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Volume 145, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages e17-e18 (April 2013)
Body Composition and Barrett’s Esophagus
Ira J. Fox, Stephen C. Strom  Gastroenterology 
Volume 148, Issue 7, Pages (June 2015)
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease  Peter J. Kahrilas, Nicholas.
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Intragastric pH With Oral vs Intravenous Bolus Plus Infusion Proton-Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Bleeding Ulcers  Loren Laine, Abbid Shah,
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Normal Values of Pharyngeal and Esophageal 24-Hour pH Impedance in Individuals on and off Therapy and Interobserver Reproducibility  Frank Zerbib, Sabine.
Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Esophageal Testing Compared to pH Alone for Diagnosing Both Acid and Weakly Acidic Gastroesophageal.
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages e16-e17 (September 2017)
Association Between Response to Acid-Suppression Therapy and Efficacy of Antireflux Surgery in Patients With Extraesophageal Reflux  Joseph T. Krill,
Management of Patients With Functional Heartburn
A Historical Perspective on Clinical Advances in Pancreatic Diseases
Volume 150, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Nonlinear Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Esophageal Acid Exposure in the Extraesophageal Manifestations of Reflux  Muhammad Aslam, James C.
Use of Direct, Endoscopic-Guided Measurements of Mucosal Impedance in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease  Elif Saritas Yuksel, Tina Higginbotham,
Should the Reflex Be Reflux
Sibu Varghese, Pierre Lao–Sirieix, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald 
Brian M. Fung, Nora Ostrzega, James H. Tabibian  Gastroenterology 
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Atopic Characteristics of Adult Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Update on the Use of Vonoprazan: A Competitive Acid Blocker
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
William K. Fackler, Tina M. Ours, Michael F. Vaezi, Joel E. Richter 
Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus
Caution About Overinterpretation of Symptom Indexes in Reflux Monitoring for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease  James C. Slaughter, Marion Goutte,
Laura Rotundo, Sushil Ahlawat  Gastroenterology 
An Unexpected Cause of Intestinal Obstruction in an Uncommon Site
Rafael Esteban, Maria Buti  Gastroenterology 
Efficacy of Esophageal Impedance/pH Monitoring in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, on and off Therapy  Jason M. Pritchett, Muhammad.
An Unlikely Lesion to Be Identified in the Cervical Esophagus
A Selection of the Best AGA Abstracts of DDW 2017
Volume 146, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, David Lieberman  Gastroenterology 
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Francis Ka Leung Chan, James Yun Wong Lau 
The Rise and Fall (and Rise?) of Endoscopic Anti-Reflux Procedures
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Richard J. Saad, William D. Chey  Gastroenterology 
Volume 156, Issue 1, Pages 7-10 (January 2019)
Volume 156, Issue 5, Pages (April 2019)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 155, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2010)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (May 2010)
Novel Endoscopic Approaches in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia: Macroscopes, Microscopes, and Metal Detectors  Anna M. Buchner, Michael B. Wallace  Gastroenterology 
Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Mucosal Bridge
Achalasia: Update on the Disease and Its Treatment
The Future of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Controversies in Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
Statin Use Is Associated With a Decreased Risk of Barrett’s Esophagus
Volume 157, Issue 1, Pages (July 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Mucosal Impedance Discriminates GERD From Non-GERD Conditions Fehmi Ates, Elif Saritas Yuksel, Tina Higginbotham, James C. Slaughter, Jerry Mabary, Robert T. Kavitt, C. Gaelyn Garrett, David Francis, Michael F. Vaezi  Gastroenterology  Volume 148, Issue 2, Pages 334-343 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.010 Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic representation of MI catheter. (A) Two 2-mm–long impedance sensing electrodes positioned 1 mm from the tip of a 2-mm soft catheter were advanced through an upper endoscope. MI measurements were obtained by direct mucosal contact of sensors at the site of esophagitis (if present) and 2, 5, and 10 cm above the SCJ. (B) Photograph of the MI catheter (inset) and schematic comparison of the MI catheter to the traditional multichannel impedance pH catheter along the esophageal lumen. Measurements represent distances from the SCJ. Gastroenterology 2015 148, 334-343DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.010) Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Median (IQR) MI measurements at (A) 2 cm, (B) 5 cm, and (C) 10 cm above the SCJ for the 5 study groups. MI measurements were significantly (P < .001) lower for GERD (E+, E−/pH+) and EoE than non-GERD (achalasia or E−/pH−). (D) Median (IQR) MI values in an axial distribution along the esophagus for the 5 study groups. GERD and non-GERD patients showed lower MI values at the distal esophagus with a progressive increase along the esophagus, with the former group having lower MI values at all levels than the latter group. The MI pattern in EoE was distinct from GERD in showing low MI values all along the esophagus. Gastroenterology 2015 148, 334-343DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.010) Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Median (IQR) MI values at 2, 5, and 10 cm above the SCJ in patients with esophagitis (E+) before and after PPI therapy. At all sites in the esophagus, the MI values increased significantly after PPI therapy. Gastroenterology 2015 148, 334-343DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.010) Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Predictive probability of esophagitis as a function of (A) MI or (B) percent time pH was <4. MI values less than 2000 Ω better predicted presence of GERD than pH monitoring. Gastroenterology 2015 148, 334-343DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.010) Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions