Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerics of physical parametrizations
Advertisements

Governing Equations IV
Developments at GFDL Leo Donner WGNE, Tokyo, 20 October 2010.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Moisture Transport in Baroclinic Waves Ian Boutle a, Stephen Belcher a, Bob Plant a Bob Beare b, Andy Brown c 24 April 2014.
A High-Order Finite-Volume Scheme for the Dynamical Core of Weather and Climate Models Christiane Jablonowski and Paul A. Ullrich, University of Michigan,
Earth’s Weather Patterns
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
Trying to Stop a Leak in the Operational Global Model Thomas J. Galarneau, Jr. Mesoscale Dynamics Section Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory.
1 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
GFDL’s global non-hydrostatic modeling system for multi-time-scale tropical cyclone simulations and predictions Shian-Jiann Lin with contributions from:
GFDL’s unified regional-global weather and climate modeling system is designed for all temporal-spatial scales Examples: Regional cloud-resolving Radiative-Convective.
Numerical Modeling of Climate Hydrodynamic equations: 1. equations of motion 2. thermodynamic equation 3. continuity equation 4. equation of state 5. equations.
The Lin-Rood Finite Volume (FV) Dynamical Core: Tutorial
Geophysical Modelling: Climate Modelling How advection, diffusion, choice of grids, timesteps etc are defined in state of the art models.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Numerical weather prediction: current state and perspectives M.A.Tolstykh Institute of Numerical Mathematics RAS, and Hydrometcentre of Russia.
Current issues in GFS moist physics Hua-Lu Pan, Stephen Lord, and Bill Lapenta.
Hydrostatic. HIWPP Hydrostatic Models ModelBy Res. at 40 deg lat Output Freq. Output Res. Vertical Levels NEMS ready Initial Condi- tions Physics GFS.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Computational Math Group Amik St-Cyr, Ram Nair, Natasha Flyer Group Head: Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
Zängl ICON The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic model: Formulation of the dynamical core and physics-dynamics coupling Günther Zängl and the ICON.
Lecture Oct 18. Today’s lecture Quiz returned on Monday –See Lis if you didn’t get yours –Quiz average 7.5 STD 2 Review from Monday –Calculate speed of.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
29th EWGLAM meeting, Dubrovnik, October 2007 ALARO Physics developments Neva Pristov LACE Working group for physics.
Report to WGOMD on GFDL Ocean Modelling Activities Stephen Griffies NOAA/GFDL (and CSIRO) IPCC AR4 activities Model developments.
Altitude (km) January Global AverageTemperature (K) Pressure (hPa) With O( 3 P) Cooling WACCM-X The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – eXtended.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
1 Next Generation of NR Michiko Masutani January 2009.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
KoreaCAM-EULAG February 2008 Implementation of a Non-Hydrostatic, Adaptive-Grid Dynamics Core in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model William J. Gutowski,
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
AMWG Breakout, CCSM Workshop June 25, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Dave Randall National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Implementation of Grid Adaptation in CAM: Comparison of Dynamic Cores Babatunde J. Abiodun 1,2 William J. Gutowski 1, and Joseph M. Prusa 1,3 1 Iowa State.
MOLOCH : ‘MOdello LOCale’ on ‘H’ coordinates. Model description ISTITUTO DI SCIENZE DELL'ATMOSFERA E DEL CLIMA, ISAC-CNR Piero Malguzzi:
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Development of an Atmospheric Climate Model with Self-Adapting Grid and Physics Joyce E. Penner 1, Michael Herzog 2, Christiane Jablonowski 3, Bram van.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Ensemble Seasonal Predictions and Medium- Range Deterministic Forecasts of Tropical Cyclones with GFDL’s prototype Global Cloud- Resolving Model Shian-Jiann.
ARPS( Advanced Regional Prediction System ) Version Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS), Oklahoma University tridimensional compressible.
Mirin – AMWG 2006 – Slide 1 Coupled Finite-Volume Simulations at One-Degree Resolution Art Mirin and Govindasamy Bala Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
1 Next Generation of NR Michiko Masutani November 20, 2008.
Status of CAM, March 2004 Phil Rasch. Differences between CAM2 and CAM3 (standard physics version) Separate liquid and ice phases Advection, sedimentation.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
Adaptive Grids in Climate Modeling: Dynamical Core Tests
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Outlines of NICAM NICAM (Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model)
Climate Dynamics 11:670:461 Alan Robock
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
How will the earth’s temperature change?
GFDL-NCAR/CCSM collaborations
Reporter : Prudence Chien
GungHo! A new dynamical core for the Unified Model Nigel Wood, Dynamics Research, UK Met Office © Crown copyright Met Office.
Presentation transcript:

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Dynamical Core and Seamless Regional-Global Model Developments Presented by Shian-Jiann Lin Presented by Shian-Jiann Lin

3 Dynamical Core and Seamless Regional-Global Model Developments

4 Past Past users of the latitude-longitude FV core 1 : a community resource – GFDL CM2.1, NASA GEOS-5, NCAR/CCSM, and ECHAM-5 (for tracer transport) – Univ of Maryland (Kalnay), Univ of Michigan (Penner), ICTP (Italy), National Central Univ (Taiwan), Seoul National Univ (Korea), and … Present Present Cubed-sphere FV core: improved accuracy & parallelism 2 – GFDL CM3 for IPCC AR5 – NASA/GSFC and GISS are developing their next generation climate model based on the cubed-sphere FV core Future Future Non-hydrostatic option and various algorithmic improvements: – Adaptive Mesh Refinement and a limited area configuration with self consistent nesting for improved regional resolution – Global cloud-resolving weather-climate applications 1 Lin 2004, Mon. Wea. Rev. 2 Putman and Lin 2007, J. Comp. Phys. Finite Volume Dynamical Cores

5 Generalization to non-orthogonal curvilinear coordinate Horizontal transport scheme - fully monotonic with reduced numerical dissipation 4 th order pressure gradient and remapping of the winds from D to C grid The vertical remapping (Lagrangian Eulerian) - one-sided extrapolation at the top/ bottom using cubic polynomials that is coupled with the interior PPM sub-grid reconstruction scheme (1D tri-diagonal solver) More scale-selective 4 th, 6 th, and 8 th order divergence damping Non-hydrostatic dynamics with model top open to sound waves (solving a 1-D Rieman-invariant problem) Mesh refinement and two-way self consistent nesting (work in progress) Changes / Improvements Since IPCC AR4

6 Standard upwind method observed clouds 3 rd order Lagrangian transport Reducing numerical dissipation - avoiding compensating tuning in physical parameterizations Small amount of cloud ice transported into lower stratosphere beyond the freeze-dry point can lead to anomalously high water vapor concentration Commonly used low-order numerical methods in cloud micro-physics, and/or cumulus parameterizations can introduce large errors that is compensated by unphysical tuning It is important that the basic numerics be accurate enough before physical tuning is performed. The FV core provides a solid foundation for physics development 1D (L48) experiment set up: Cloud condensates in 3-way equilibrium (terminal fall, large-scale transport, and production by convection and micro-physics) Net (zero) transport emulated by random movements of the layer interfaces development

7 Old FV model with del-2 divergence damping New FV model with higher order divergence damping Reducing numerical dissipation improved QBO

8 AM2.1 (2x2.5 deg.) C90 cloud-resolving prototypeC360 cloud-resolving prototype Cold bias disappears as resolution increases Can the tropical cold bias be avoided without deep convective parameterization?

9 Finite-Volume dynamical core starting from C90 (~100 km) to C2000 (~ 5km), reducing the need for sub-grid parameterizations Non-precipitating shallow convection Cloud microphysics with cloud water, ice, snow, rain, and graupel as prognostic variables. Conservative and highly accurate Lagrangian terminal fall of all condensates Binary cloud cover (0/1) HFIP: 5-day forecast experiments (2005 hurricane Wilma) C360 (25km) vs. C720 (13 km) Global cloud-resolving prototype model development

10 Global cloud-resolving prototype model (C720): 5-day forecast of Wilma (18 Oct 2005)

11 The latitude-longitude grid finite-volume dynamical core has become a community resource (e.g., NCAR CCSM and NASA GEOS-5) The finite-volume algorithms have been extended to the cubed- sphere geometry with quasi-uniform resolution over the whole globe – improving both the scalability and numerical accuracy The non-hydrostatic extension of the cubed-sphere FV core provides a development path towards higher horizontal resolution - reducing the need for sub-grid parameterizations with increasing realism Summary

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009