The EDR phase Discussion Session

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 7, 2007-Beijing (Zisman-DR) Global Design Effort 1 Damping Ring EDR Plans Michael S. Zisman, Jie Gao, Susanna Guiducci, Andy Wolski DR Area System.
Advertisements

Program Management Office Department of Innovation & Technology City of Boston Kickoff Meeting.
BDS GDE context LC-ABD2 : WP4 - Beam Line Design 12 th April 2007, LC-ABD Plenary, RHUL Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, The Cockcroft Institute.
Philip Burrows LCABD Meeting, RHUL 12/04/07 WP7: Beam feedback and control systems Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
September 21 - November 6, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beyond the RDR - some ideas Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE)
Global Design Effort BDS KOM Opening remarks/comments from EDR Project Management SLAC Marc Ross / Nick Walker.
HiGrade WP2 & WP4 Coordination & Governance Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) HiGrade Meeting LAL/Orsay 12/10/11.
The 3rd package for the internal energy market Key proposals EUROPEAN COMMISSION Heinz Hilbrecht Directorate C - Security of supply and energy markets.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
27-March-10 LCWS10 - Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish LCWS10 - Beijing 27-March-10 “Cost Containment” for the TDR.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC Engineering Design Phase - Status & Plans Mike Harrison GDE/BNL.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
1 Global Design Effort Beijing GDE Meeting, February 2007 Controls for Linac Parallel Session 2/6/07 John Carwardine ANL.
FALC Was “Funding agencies for linear collider” Now “funding agencies for large colliders” WHY ??
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Conventional Facilities and Siting GG Global Design Effort BILCW 07 - Beijing1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Summary Report.
DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY.
Global Design Effort September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review R&D Programme (Tools) Eckhard Elsen GDE DESY.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Plans for the EDR phase Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) Beijing Meeting.
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC Americas Region February 7, ILC Source Systems Work Packages and EDR Discussions ILC GDE Meeting IHEP, Beijing, China J. C.
Main Linac Technology (MLT) Meeting To be held through WebEx July 13, 2007.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
Global Design Effort RTML KOM Close-out Ross, Walker.
Global Design Effort Close-Out Points EDR time-scale (2010) –No demonstrations to ILC-like RF unit –3(?) CMs constructed at FNAL – not RDR baseline –2(?)
Global Design Effort Controls LLRF EDR Kick Off Meeting View from the Project Management Office Fermilab / ANL August 20, 2007.
Module 4: Effect of Agile on the DoD Program Office TLO: Given a DoD program involved in software development using Agile philosophy methodologies, the.
July 11, 2008M Ross for PM - ILC GDE - ILCDR08 closeout 1 GDE Program for the ILC Technical Design Phase Marc Ross for: Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE.
Relations with concept groups
Maria Machancoses Programme Director
GEF Familiarization Seminar
TUC Pensions: From Reform to Reality Conference
The 3rd package for the internal energy market
Establishing and Managing a Schedule Baseline
Oct 22 Group Leaders Planning meeting
Project Initiation.
EDR Planning, Cost Review and Technical Risk Analysis
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
Report on plan to produce an Engineering Design Report
ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe – KICK OFF MEETING
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December 10, 2007 Acknowledgment: Jerry Aarons, Clay Corvin, and Esther Kweon Fred Asiri.
Project & Program Governance
WP4– Points of discussion
CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting: Objectives & Organization
Research Program Strategic Plan
Dynamics 365 for Wholesale Ditribution Readiness Assessment
Business Strategy & Operations Manager
Guidance notes for Project Manager
Principles of Project Management Case Study - Programme Management: Developing a Blueprint Graham Collins University College London (UCL)
Marketing Supply Coordinator Strategy Implementation Iberia (m/f)
Acknowledgements.
Contemporary PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 3e
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Risk Adjusted Project Schedules
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Mindsets, Roles, Responsibilities and Artefacts in Open PM2
The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort.
Ms Charlotte Salford, Associate Vice-President
S3P Agri-Food Working Committee Meeting
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
RF System (HLRF, LLRF, Controls) EDR Plan Overview
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

The EDR phase Discussion Session Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) Beijing Meeting 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort

Introduction Structure Brief Contributions Some brief words summarising input so far Brief Contributions Magnets & Cryo - M. Ross Beam dynamics - D. Schulte Survey & alignment - M. Scholesser? Others? Open discussion 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort

Input so far General acceptance of work packages as basis for EDR. Some indications that increase in effort RDR -> EDR more like factor 3 than factor 2. Uncertainty about level of detail required. “30% model” - “100% model”? Concern about bidding process widespread. - Clarification: “bidding” always expected to be exception not rule. Expectation is that almost all WPs will be defined iteratively and that the consortia will be formed consensually and will have an obvious membership. PMT will catalyze this process with help from EC. Nevertheless, need process to deal with rare cases where there are competing and incompatible approaches. 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort

Input so far Area system or Technical system work packages? - Some parts of the project consider strong case for some technical system work packages. This is fine in principle e.g. survey seems to be clearly a TS WP. Need to take account of role of PMT in strengthening “horizontal” part of project matrix - some proposed TS WPs may be better in several AS WPs with strong coordination and standards from PMT. Key criterion level of uniformity for TS deliverables across the AS WPs. Magnets (see MR) interesting case study. Need validation from governments that RDR “on right track” in terms of affordability - if not, then resources must urgently concentrate to investigate further cost reduction. Make the point that doe is lowest common denominator but not that that is the only thing we need to worry about. 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort

Input so far No point in reducing duplication of work by awarding WPs if the funding elsewhere is then lost - careful optimisation in award of WPs essential. How do we deal with infrastructure that clearly cross boundaries of any likely WP - e.g. ATF2? Some activities essential to regional aspirations to host ILC. WP structure needs to take account of this. Essential to ensure that distributed funding sources such as major labs. have ability to influence direction of EDR & ILC in general.Overlap here with issues of oversight - in principle major labs have voice on ILCSC oversight - some options for future post EDR MoUs would have “”Council” of major stakeholders. 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort

Input so far PM needs to have maximum possible ability to influence R&D strategic directions. Scope of the EDR should be minimum possible to attain our goals - otherwise we run risk of setting ourselves an impossible task at the outset of EDR. Realistic calculation of likely effort available and the minimum EDR will define what the timescale has to be. Our plan for end 2009 may not match with the reality of available resources. US not DoE approva - change l 04/02/07 Beijing Global Design Effort