York Downs Development: The Normandale Community’s Perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Committed to Effective Community Development and Partnership.
Advertisements

A case of sustainable development.  Hopewell centre II is located in zone of transition in Wan Chai  Adjacent to CBD  A mixed commercial-residential.
Presentation to the Palm Coast City Council June 3 rd 2014 By Chip Hunter, President of the Riverview Condominium Homeowners Association Riverview Condominium.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Blessed Sacrament Campus Jamaica Plain, Boston A newly formed joint venture, Church Square Community Partners LLC has recently purchased the Blessed Sacrament.
1837 Pine Street Project Overview Pine Street - Site Plan 2.
A Multifamily Industry Perspective on Impact Fees Presented by Rachel S. Arnold National Apartment Association October 2003 National Impact Fees Roundtable.
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
How Cities are Re-making Themselves
How it changed perspective for one City and its residents.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Urban Sprawl. Urban Sprawl, outward spread of built-up areas caused by their expansion. It is the result of urbanization.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Local Government and Suburbanization Local issues local government growth and sprawl smart growth.
13 th – 15 March, 2006 New Perspectives in Real Estate Development In Port of Spain Welcome.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Smart Growth and Air Quality: Design Concepts to Protect Human Health David B. Goldstein, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA
Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.
Mixed-Use Development Challenges and Opportunities.
Hunterspoint Mixed-Income Housing Design Project Urban Systems Studio December 9, 2008.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Land Use Regulations March 29, Building Codes Building codes are municipal ordinances that set minimum standards for the types of materials used.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Urban Land Use Chapter 21.
Urban Land Uses 6 Land Classifications. 1.0 Residential Land Uses includes all the places where people live often takes up to 40% or more of the developed.
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
How does this BBC TV series link to today’s lesson
Lessons from 100 years of urban experience with the automobile.
2017 City Budget Today, I am going to talk about the City of Toronto budget, why it matters for communities, how the process works, what we know so far.
Land Use Regulations March 28, 2017.
Appeal of Alamo/Nut Tree McDonald’s June 27, 2017
COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Urban Land Use.
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
Housing as an Economic Driver The Potential for Home Building Growth
E Properties & Development Holy Family Project Community Report Back Meeting August 7, 2012 St. Mary’s Lyceum – 6pm.
SANDAG Inaccuracies November 2017 Proprietary & Confidential.
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
83 North Lake Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
Urban Land Use.
Urban Land Use.
Missing Middle Housing
University Line Houston, Texas Arch 5604 Spring 2008 Andrew Tyler
Land Use Regulations GOVT 2306, Module 11.
The Burbs.
Please fill out the index card and we will answer questions at the end!
Summary of Proposed Zoning and Height Changes in Downtown Greenwood
York Downs Is this good planning or bad planning?
How Cities are Re-making Themselves
Kimley-Horn & Associates
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
Urban Land Use.
1. Introduction Today: Markham’s traffic problem
Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application
York Downs Development: The Normandale Community’s Perspective
City Council Meeting April 23, 2018
Some Normandale Concerns
WWPNA General Member Meeting October 16, 2018
Clarke Street Rezoning Bylaw 3161
Traffic networks don’t do what you expect or why it is important to have traffic triggers/measurements at each phase of the York Downs development.
With funding from the Appalachian Regional Commission
Zones of Melbourne.
Presentation transcript:

York Downs Development: The Normandale Community’s Perspective Presentation by Dennis Fortnum, President of the Normandale Community Residents Association

York Downs Development: NCRA Questions How is the development “compatible to the surrounding existing residential community” specifically the Normandale Community to the south?  Has the Normandale Community been considered in the planning process, if so, how?  Why is all the high density housing in the south part of the plan, amplifying traffic congestion on 16th?  The Normandale Community has no exit other than onto 16th Ave, the current plan would have most of the cars in the new development exiting on 16th Ave, causing major traffic issues for the Normandale residents who already find it difficult to enter and exit the subdivision. Why does the Red Block (Mixed Use) along 16th and adjacent to the Normandale Community have retail and commercial space AND a residential density of 60 units/hectare compared to approximately 12 units/hectare for the Normandale Community?  Why is the Red Block not in the middle of the development to help create a community centre or along Kennedy Road where it is more compatible with the existing community and there is better transit?  Why has there not been proper public consultation on the proposed plan and why is the Developer filing with the OMB before going through a proper process at the local/City level.

Contrast! Very high density of south development adjacent to the mature Normandale Community York Downs Development Adjacent to Normandale Community 60 units per hectare Normandale Community 9.5 units per hectare

NCRA York Downs Development Issues Totally incompatible - the proposed YD development is totally incompatible with the existing adjacent Normandale Community and inconsistent with key planning principles for infill projects. Density – the density in the Red Block directly across from the Normandale Community is 60 units/ha plus 40,000ft of Commercial space which increases the effective density to 75 units/ha compared to 9.5/ha for the Normandale Community; density in the broader Unionville area to the south of YD is 12 units/ha Traffic – with the majority of the higher density units concentrated in the south part of the development and the development designed to have most of the traffic/5000+ cars exiting onto 16th Ave, traffic is a significant issue for a landlocked pocket of houses that has no alternative but to exit onto 16th Ave. Neighborhood traffic will also increase as people search for alternatives out of the new development and to escape the traffic congestion on 16th Ave. Environment – with the addition of 5000+ cars and the elimination of 4000 mature trees and tens of thousands smaller trees and natural brush, including those along 16th Ave, the impact on air quality, sound quality and the overall natural environment will be enormous and will have a direct and significant impact on the residents of the Normandale Community. Build form – retail, commercial and high rise units are totally inconsistent with the Normandale Community. This is an infill project not a greenfield project and the existing communities MUST be respected Property Values – the impact on property values in the Normandale Community will be significant. It is estimated property values will decline by 10% to 20% if the existing plan is implemented. This would mean an average loss in property values of up to $300k per household or a cumulative loss for the residents of $40 to $50 million. Quality of Life – traffic, environment, build form, property values will all negatively impact the quality of life of the long term residents of the established and mature Normandale Community Residents’ Rights – Kylemore has designed the development to put the high density and mixed use commercial and retail adjacent to the Normandale Community to maximize their profits at the expense of the residents of the Normandale Community. This is not the Kylemore and Stollery family we know and this is not the Markham we know. If this project proceeds as planned we will see this as the Stollery family and Kylemore turning their back on the existing Unionville community and, if approved or not contested at the OMB by the City, a breach of the trust we have in the City of Markham, its Councilors and the Mayor.

Thank you for your time