Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages (August 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robert L. Unckless, Virginia M. Howick, Brian P. Lazzaro 
Advertisements

Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
DDT resistance in flies carries no cost
Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (May 2007)
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Theta-Coupled Periodic Replay in Working Memory
Multisensory flavour perception
Rachael A. Bay, Stephen R. Palumbi  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Margarita V. Chibalina, Dmitry A. Filatov  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Human colour perception changes between seasons
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e6 (August 2017)
Contrast Adaptation and Representation in Human Early Visual Cortex
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Better Fruits and Vegetables through Sensory Analysis
Maximizing the Power of Principal-Component Analysis of Correlated Phenotypes in Genome-wide Association Studies  Hugues Aschard, Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson,
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Gut Microbiota and Extreme Longevity
Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Timing, Timing, Timing: Fast Decoding of Object Information from Intracranial Field Potentials in Human Visual Cortex  Hesheng Liu, Yigal Agam, Joseph.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
A Genome-Wide Association Study of Basal Transepidermal Water Loss Finds that Variants at 9q34.3 Are Associated with Skin Barrier Function  Manfei Zhang,
Locomotion Controls Spatial Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking
Goal-Driven Behavioral Adaptations in Gap-Climbing Drosophila
Volume 17, Issue 16, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 23, Pages (December 2016)
A Visual Sense of Number
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages (August 2013)
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
Binaral Rivalry between the Nostrils and in the Cortex
Robert L. Unckless, Virginia M. Howick, Brian P. Lazzaro 
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Taste Perception: How Sweet It Is (To Be Transcribed by You)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages 1601-1605 (August 2013) A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection  Sara R. Jaeger, Jeremy F. McRae, Christina M. Bava, Michelle K. Beresford, Denise Hunter, Yilin Jia, Sok Leang Chheang, David Jin, Mei Peng, Joanna C. Gamble, Kelly R. Atkinson, Lauren G. Axten, Amy G. Paisley, Leah Tooman, Benedicte Pineau, Simon A. Rouse, Richard D. Newcomb  Current Biology  Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages 1601-1605 (August 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sensitivity to β-Ionone Is Determined by rs6591536 in OR5A1 (A) Plot of associated region on chromosome 11. The nucleotide position is given in megabase pairs (Mb). Variants genotyped using SNP 6.0 arrays are shaded blue, and variants genotyped by olfactory receptor (OR) gene sequencing are shaded black. The locations of genes within the associated region are shown beneath the association plot, with OR genes shaded red. (B) Two dimensional representation of the transmembrane regions of OR5A1 with rs6591536 aspartic acid to asparagine amino acid change at position 183 (N183D) indicated. (C) Dose-response curves from ORs to β-ionone. Error bars show the SEM. (D) Dose-response curves from rs6591536 alleles of OR5A1 to β-ionone, dose-response data from OR5A1 in (C) with D183 allele replotted for comparison. Error bars show the SEM. (E) Odor detection threshold distributions by rs6591536 genotypes. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1–S4. Current Biology 2013 23, 1601-1605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Orthonasal Experience of β-Ionone Differs between Individuals Carrying the More-Sensitive GG/AG and Less-Sensitive AA rs6591536 Genotypes The changes between concentrations are shown as dashed lines between points for each of the genotype groups. The percentage of total variance explained by each component is given in the axis labels. (A) Sensitivity groups plotted on the two strongest components in principal component analysis (PCA) of applicability of odor descriptors. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (ppm). (B) Odor descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA of applicability of odor descriptors. One hundred twenty-nine of the 146 descriptors are shown, and only the descriptors that were most different in usage between the sensitivity groups are labeled. (C) Sensitivity groups plotted on the two strongest components in PCA of applicability of semantic emotion descriptors. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (ppm). (D) Semantic emotional descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA of applicability of semantic emotion descriptors. The vector of increasing hedonic response is shown as an arrow superimposed on the graph. See also Figure S2 and Table S4. Current Biology 2013 23, 1601-1605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Retronasal Experience of β-Ionone Differs between Individuals Carrying the More-Sensitive GG/AG and Less-Sensitive AA rs6591536 Genotypes The changes between concentrations are shown as dashed lines between points for each of the genotype groups. The percentage of total variance explained by each component is given in the axis labels. (A) Descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA after correspondence analysis of sensory descriptors for the samples in water. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (parts per billion [ppb]). (B) Descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA after correspondence analysis of sensory descriptors for the orange-flavored beverage. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (ppb). (C) Descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA after correspondence analysis of sensory descriptors for milk chocolate samples. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (ppm). See also Figure S3 and Table S4. Current Biology 2013 23, 1601-1605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Food, Beverage, Personal and Household Care Product Perception, Liking, Choice and Appropriateness of Use Differ between Individuals Carrying the More-Sensitive GG/AG and Less-Sensitive AA rs6591536 Genotypes (A) Appropriateness-of-use descriptors plotted on the two strongest components in PCA after hedonic and appropriateness-of-use evaluation for milk chocolate samples. Groups are identified by rs6591536 genotype and β-ionone concentration (ppm). The changes between concentrations are shown as dashed lines between points for each of the genotype groups. The percentage of total variance explained by each component is given in the axis labels. (B) Differences in hedonic and willingness to drink ratings between apple juice samples with and without 500 ppb added β-ionone. (C) Comparison of the apple juice samples chosen by each sensitivity group for samples with and without 500 ppb added β-ionone. (D) Comparison of the responses each sensitivity group gave to nonfood products. Odor samples containing 250 ppb added β-ionone were rated for appropriateness for a product concept description, and cleaning-product samples containing added β-ionone were rated for appropriateness-of-use across eight personal and household care product categories. Error bars show the SEM. See also Figure S4 and Table S4. Current Biology 2013 23, 1601-1605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions