Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Advertisements

Timing and Specificity of Feed-Forward Inhibition within the LGN
Activity-Dependent Regulation of HCN Pacemaker Channels by Cyclic AMP
Zhuo-Hua Pan, Hui-Juan Hu, Paul Perring, Rodrigo Andrade  Neuron 
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Maryline Beurg, Jong-Hoon Nam, Andrew Crawford, Robert Fettiplace 
Calcium Dynamics of Spines Depend on Their Dendritic Location
Underestimated Sensitivity of Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cells Due to Splay between Stereociliary Columns  Jong-Hoon Nam, Anthony W. Peng, Anthony J. Ricci 
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Cell-Autonomous Excitation of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons by Endocannabinoid- Dependent Lipid Signaling  Stephanie C. Gantz, Bruce P. Bean  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 113, Issue 8, Pages (October 2017)
An Intersubunit Interaction Regulates Trafficking of Rod Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels and Is Disrupted in an Inherited Form of Blindness  Matthew.
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Threshold Behavior in the Initiation of Hippocampal Population Bursts
Thomas Voets, Erwin Neher, Tobias Moser  Neuron 
Anthony W. Peng, Thomas Effertz, Anthony J. Ricci  Neuron 
Pacemaking by HCN Channels Requires Interaction with Phosphoinositides
Kristian Wadel, Erwin Neher, Takeshi Sakaba  Neuron 
Xiao-hui Zhang, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
David Zenisek, Gary Matthews  Neuron 
David C. Immke, Edwin W. McCleskey  Neuron 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Martin D Bootman, Michael J Berridge, Peter Lipp  Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Christopher B. O'Connell, Anne K. Warner, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 1996)
Endogenous Calcium Buffers Regulate Fast Exocytosis in the Synaptic Terminal of Retinal Bipolar Cells  Juan Burrone, Guilherme Neves, Ana Gomis, Anne.
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 113, Issue 8, Pages (October 2017)
Nobutake Hosoi, Matthew Holt, Takeshi Sakaba  Neuron 
SK2 Channel Modulation Contributes to Compartment-Specific Dendritic Plasticity in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells  Gen Ohtsuki, Claire Piochon, John P. Adelman,
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
A.Kimberley McAllister, Lawrence C. Katz, Donald C. Lo  Neuron 
Anita Reddy, Elisabet V. Caler, Norma W. Andrews  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Visualization of Subunit-Specific Delivery of Glutamate Receptors to Postsynaptic Membrane during Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation  Hiromitsu Tanaka,
Mechanotransduction by Hair Cells: Models, Molecules, and Mechanisms
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Endocannabinoids Mediate Neuron-Astrocyte Communication
Sharona E Gordon, Michael D Varnum, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Xiao-hui Zhang, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Calcineurin Regulates M Channel Modal Gating in Sympathetic Neurons
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Zhuo-Hua Pan, Hui-Juan Hu, Paul Perring, Rodrigo Andrade  Neuron 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Stephanie Rudolph, Linda Overstreet-Wadiche, Jacques I. Wadiche  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Elementary Functional Properties of Single HCN2 Channels
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Keiko Tanaka, George J. Augustine  Neuron 
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Regulation of the Readily Releasable Vesicle Pool by Protein Kinase C
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Daniel M Suter, Andrew W Schaefer, Paul Forscher  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Byung-Chang Suh, Karina Leal, Bertil Hille  Neuron 
Joshua S. Weinger, Minhua Qiu, Ge Yang, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 309-320 (October 2004) Hair Cells Require Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate for Mechanical Transduction and Adaptation  Moritoshi Hirono, Charlotte S. Denis, Guy P. Richardson, Peter G. Gillespie  Neuron  Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 309-320 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020

Figure 1 PIP2 Is Asymmetrically Distributed in Hair Cells (A–C) Three examples of PIP2 immunoreactivity in isolated cells with fixative-saline permeabilization. Red, actin (detected with phalloidin); green, PIP2 immunoreactivity with 2C11 antibody. Arrowhead in (B) indicates bridge of PIP2 extending from basolateral surface to the base of the kinocilium. Scale bar in (A), 10 μm. Scale bar in (B) (2 μm) also applies to (C) and (D). (D) 1% Triton X-100 permeabilization on ice before fixation (2C11). (E) KT10 anti-PIP2 antibody. Note complete staining of kinocilium and modest apical surface staining, occasionally seen with either antibody. Scale bar, 5 μm. (F) Control for (G) and (H) (2C11). Scale bar (5 μm) also applies to (G) and (H). (G) Coincubation with 40 μg/ml diC8-PIP2 (2C11). (H) Coincubation with 40 μg/ml IP3 (2C11). (I) Control for (J) and (K) (2C11). Scale bar (5 μm) also applies to (J)–(L). (J–L) Twenty minute preincubation with 100 μM PAO (J), 100 μM quercetin (K), or 50 μM wortmannin (L). 2C11 was used. (M–P) Whole-mount saccular epithelium, isolated without subtilisin treatment and labeled with 2C11. Confocal slices at 6 μm (M), 3.5 μm (N), 1.5 μm (O), and 0 μm (P) from the base of leftmost bundle. Arrowheads in (M) indicate kinociliary bulbs near the top of the bundle. In (O), note PIP2 immunoreactivity in bundle at elevated level (arrowhead), but little PIP2 in bundle at a lower level (arrow). Scale bar, 5 μm. (Q) Immunogold electron microscopy of hair cell in intact saccular epithelium using 2C11, without subtilisin treatment and with fixative-saline permeabilization. Scale bar, 500 nm. Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 2 Localization of PS in Hair Cells Two examples of annexin V labeling of fixed isolated hair cells, permeabilized with saponin. Note band of annexin V labeling at ankle link region found in some cells (arrow). Scale bar, 5 μm. Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 3 Reciprocal Distribution of PIP2 and Lipid Phosphatase Ptprq (A) Ptprq in isolated frog saccular hair cell. Red, actin; blue, Ptprq. Scale bar (2 μm) also applies to (B). (B) Inverse correspondence of Ptprq and PIP2 in saccule hair cell. Green, PIP2; blue, Ptprq. Ptprq labeling near stereocilia tips is probably in membrane blebs, not in the kinocilium; Ptprq was never observed in kinocilia in whole mounts (e.g., [C]). (C) Ptprq is basally located only in striolar hair cells of the frog utricle. Projection of confocal stack through hair bundles and apical surfaces. Scale bar, 25 μm. (D–G) Ptprq in utricular hair bundles in the striola; confocal slices at 6 μm (D), 2 μm (E), 1 μm (F), and 0 μm (G) from the base of the middle bundle. Note extended Ptprq staining in the tallest row of stereocilia ([E], inset). Insets in (E) and (F) are grayscale images of bundles indicated by arrowheads. Scale bar in (G) (5 μm) also applies to (D)–(F). (H–O) PIP2 in striolar (H–K) and extrastriolar (L–O) utricular hair bundles; confocal slices at 6 μm (H and L), 4 μm (I and M), 2 μm (J and N), and 0 μm (K and O) from bundle base. Arrowhead in (O) indicates extrastriolar hair bundle. Asterisks in (J) and (O) indicate bright PIP2 immunoreactivity at epithelial surface, which may be shed membrane. Scale bar in (H) (5 μm) also applies to (I)–(O). Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 4 Inhibitors of PIP2 Slow Adaptation and Block Transduction (A) Dialysis with control solution (2.5 min and 10.5 min after break-in). (B) PAO (30 μM) slows adaptation (right, 5 min after PAO application). (C) DTT (3 mM) prevents the effects of 100 μM PAO (right, 4 min after PAO application). PAO and DTT were applied simultaneously. (D) diC8-PIP2 (200 μM) in the recording electrode does not reverse the effects of 30 μM PAO (right, 4 min after PAO application). (E) Wortmannin (50 μM) does not affect adaptation (right, 11 min after application). (F) Quercetin (100 μM) slows adaptation (right, 6 min after application). (G) Gentamicin (1 mM) slows adaptation (right, 7.5 min after break-in). Scale bars for (A)–(G) are all 25 pA and 25 ms. (H) Stimuli used for (A)–(G). (I) Transduction current amplitude in response to PAO application. PAO (100 μM or 200 μM) was applied during the time indicated by the gray bar. In some experiments, DTT (3 mM) was included to block the effects of 100 μM PAO. (J) Time constants for exponential fits to transduction currents in response to stimuli eliciting Po ≅ 0.5. Significance is indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. (K) Transduction channel resting open probability. Significance indicated as in (J). Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 5 Phenylarsine Oxide Reduces Rates of Fast and Slow Adaptation (A) Transduction currents before and ∼6 min after application of 30 μM PAO. Displacements were identical to those in Figure 4H. (B) Adaptive shifts (Xe) calculated from data in (A). Double-exponential fits use the same coloring scheme as currents in (A). (C) Extent of adaptation. Calculated from summed fast and slow Xe values. Blue symbols, before PAO treatment; red symbols, after. (D) Time constants for adaptation. Calculated from fits to Xe plots. (E) Dependence of fast adaptation rates on positive displacement size. The fast adaptation rate constant was determined by fitting the 100–400 nm control points (dashed line) or all PAO points. Blue symbols, before PAO treatment; red symbols, after. (F) Slow adaptation. The slow adaptation rate constant was determined by fitting the 400–700 nm control points (dashed line) or all PAO points. Blue symbols, before PAO treatment; red symbols, after. (G) Transduction currents during and after negative deflections. Note overshoots reflecting amount of adaptation (arrow). (H) Extent of adaptation to inhibitory deflections. Data were fit with sum of exponential and linear components; fits were weighted by errors. Blue symbols, before PAO treatment; red symbols, after. (I) Simulated transduction currents before and after PAO treatment. Adaptation was modeled similarly to that described in Shepherd and Corey (1994) with the addition of fast adaptation. Parameter values used are from Table 1. Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 6 Myo1c Binds to Anionic Phospholipids with Its IQ Domains (A) Structure of Myo1c constructs used. T701 includes amino acids 701–1028, while N123 includes amino acids 701–790. (B) Ca2+ dependence of Myo1c (T701) sedimentation in the presence (PS) or absence (None) of 100 mol% PS vesicles. Myo1c levels were detected by ELISA. (C) Ca2+ dependence of calmodulin release from Myo1c (WT) in the presence (PS) or absence (None) of 100 mol% PS vesicles. Calmodulin levels were detected by ELISA. (D) Myo1c constructs bound to anionic phospholipids on PIP strips in the presence of Ca2+. Bound Myo1c detected by immunoblotting. (E) Binding of 50 mol% PS or PIP2 vesicles to immobilized N123. Vesicles also contained 40 mol% PC and 10 mol% rhodamine-PE. Averaged data (±SEM) from five experiments. (F) Competition for binding of 50 mol% PS or 50 mol% PIP2 vesicles to immobilized N123 by soluble calmodulin (in the presence of EGTA). Fit with 100 × [1-CaM/(CaM + IC50)], where CaM is the calmodulin concentration. Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)

Figure 7 Hypothetical Role of PIP2 in Regulating Slow Adaptation through Myo1c-Membrane Interaction (Left) Myo1c with three calmodulins interacts with membranes through its tail. (Right) After calmodulins dissociate, revealing the IQ lipid binding site, the calmodulin bound to IQ1 will be brought closer to the membrane where high surface potential could elevate Ca2+. With two binding sites for membranes, Myo1c will also be bound more tightly. Neuron 2004 44, 309-320DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.020)