Part A-III Microeconomic Theory Review 15/01/07 Intro_C

Positive Science, Normative Analysis and Policy Development In this section Economics as a positive science Normative analysis Policy development 15/01/07 Intro_C

‘At the most general level’ Economics is a positive science Society has normative goals Economics can help make policy proscriptions nonetheless 15/01/07 Intro_C

Economics as a positive science Positive Science: An analytical approach is said to be positive if it represents an attempt to describe and/or explain some phenomenon. This description and/or explanation should be independent of the personal value system of the scientist. 15/01/07 Intro_C

An economist should be working towards a description and understanding of what is The results of the economic analysis should be independent of what the particular economist believes should be (free of the economist’s personal ethics or values) 15/01/07 Intro_C

It is difficult for social scientists to remain as objective as is required of a positive science It is important for a scientist to make explicit any normative (personal values) that enter into his/her analysis Example: if a social scientist is hired as a consultant by, or has some relationship with, a ‘special interest’ group, then this should be known to all before they begin to discuss their area of expertise 15/01/07 Intro_C

Normative analysis Normative analysis is concerned with what ought to be. It is by definition premised on some set of personal values or social standards Values are essentially a personal characteristic, sometimes shared across members of a society 15/01/07 Intro_C

Philosophy, Theology, Civics The development of such values, standards or criteria represents normative studies Philosophy, Theology, Civics It is important that society (political/social systems) work towards the development of normative objectives (consensus ?) 15/01/07 Intro_C

Example: the use by economists of ‘normative’ concepts of efficiency To make a meaningful contribution to social debate, economics must at times ‘cross the line’ and become a normative science Example: the use by economists of ‘normative’ concepts of efficiency Economic efficiency criteria are used by economist but they do represent a particular value system (Pareto, Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency)?? 15/01/07 Intro_C

Policy development Society (an individual member or group within the society) decides on some particular normative objective Positive science is applied in order to achieve that objective 15/01/07 Intro_C

Policy can be thought of as a set of rules to be applied in order to attain a given objective It is through positive science that we can develop the ‘best’ (most efficient) ‘set of rules’ 15/01/07 Intro_C

An Example of policy development in action: Child Labour Laws Firstly, some sort of ‘normative’ analysis would be necessary Is child labour desirable or undesirable? What exactly constitutes child labour (what age, hours of work, etc.)? Are we only concerned with child labour in Canada? and so on 15/01/07 Intro_C

Secondly, ‘positive’ economic analysis can help answer relevant questions Where does it occur? How wide spread is it? Why does it exist in some countries, industries or firms and not others? How does it affect the individuals involved (children, families, firms, consumers)? and so on 15/01/07 Intro_C

and the results of ‘positive’ analysis of the phenomenon: Finally, given the ‘normative’ objectives of society (what we like and do not like about child labour) and the results of ‘positive’ analysis of the phenomenon: What should the our policy on child labour be? What is the optimum policy (set of rules - laws, regulations, public information programs, etc.) that best attains the ‘normative’ objectives of society? 15/01/07 Intro_C

Unintended Consequences? Policy development Concensus? Unintended Consequences? It ain’t easy 15/01/07 Intro_C