Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY
Advertisements

Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Comparing One Sample to its Population
Quantity of Water and Wastewater CE 547. Probability Quantity of Water Types of Wastewater Sources of Wastewater Population Projection Deriving Design.
Whole Effluent Toxicity and How It May Help You & One City’s Experience Evaluating Unfamiliar Wastestreams Presented By Lyle Milby City of Norman Environmental.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
Welcome to the World of Investigative Tasks
SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Critical Conditions Review
Flood Recurrence Intervals and the 100 Year Flood Concept Bruce F. Rueger, Department of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME
WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Assignment 1 A mining company has applied for a permit to mine magnetite on the Livingstone Ridge in southwestern Alberta. Magnetite is used in the refining.
Toxicity Testing II P erforming a toxicity test. Toxicity testing Acute toxicity test –Short time frame exposure (96h) –“kill ‘em and count ‘em” –LC 50,
12.3 – Measures of Dispersion
Flood Frequency Analysis
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
1 Occupational Air Sampling Strategies – who, when, how…. Lecture Notes.
The Normal Distribution The “Bell Curve” The “Normal Curve”
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 6: Probability Estimation Modeling.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Four Basic Statistical Concepts, Frequency Tables, Graphs, Frequency Distributions, and Measures of Central.
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS.
Review Measures of central tendency
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Statistics Measures Chapter 15 Sections
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
A PPT FOR DETERMININING MEDIAN
Biostatistics Unit 5 – Samples. Sampling distributions Sampling distributions are important in the understanding of statistical inference. Probability.
WET Permitting and Limits Phillip Jennings (6WQ-PO) Whole Effluent Toxicity Coordinator US EPA Region Ross Ave. Dallas, TX P F
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Critical Conditions Review Jeff Borski │ Water Quality Assessment Team.
7.4 Use Normal Distributions p Warm-Up From Page 261 (Homework.) You must show all of your work for credit 1.) #9 2.) #11.
Stochastic Processes and Transition Probabilities D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M6L5 Stochastic Optimization.
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 6: Probability Estimation Modeling.
How do I graph and use exponential growth and decay functions?
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Hw 1 Prob 1 A sample of 20 cigarettes is tested to determine nicotine content and the average value observed was 1.2 mg. Compute a 99 percent two-sided.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
 Overview: Wastewater Engineering  Wastewater Characteristics  Wastewater Treatment Considerations  Overview: Wastewater Treatment Plant Design.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
Chapter 5: Integration Section 5.1 An Area Problem; A Speed-Distance Problem An Area Problem An Area Problem (continued) Upper Sums and Lower Sums Overview.
Rate of Change and Slope
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
SSF1063: Statistics for Social Sciences
NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS
BAE 5333 Applied Water Resources Statistics
Basic Hydrology: Flood Frequency
Continuous Random Variables
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Critical Conditions Review
In this section you will:
HUDM4122 Probability and Statistical Inference
More QUIZ REVIEW 1. A university wants to open application envelops to find TWO applicants with SAT scores over If scores have an average of 1500.
MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY
Hypothesis Theory examples.
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
Precipitation Analysis
Earthquakes, log relationships, trig functions
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
Virtual University of Pakistan
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
Marine Biotechnology Lab
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Tukey Control Chart Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
Frequency Distribution and Graphs
Presentation transcript:

Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent. The percent of the effluent being discharged to the receiving stream that must not be toxic is based on the historically based low flow conditions of the receiving system. For example, if under low flow conditions in freshwater the effluent can occupy 65% of the flow of the stream, in the biomonitoring toxicity tests (Short-term Chronic, 7-day Ceriodaphnia dubia survival and reproduction test and the Pimephales promelas survival and growth test) must reveal that the effluent is not toxic at a dilution of 65% or lower. The rationale is that under low flow conditions the effluent cannot occupy more than 65% of the stream but can constitute that much of the flow or lower. Therefore, the effluent cannot be toxic when diluted to 65% by upstream or laboratory water.

Depending on the State and the EPA Region, what constitutes the historic low flow conditions can vary. Most often the low flow is based on the 7Q10 flow. In Texas the low flow is based on the 7Q2 flow. The definition of 7Q10 is, the lowest average discharge over a period of one week with a recurrence interval of 10 years. Since the value of N for the 7Q10 is 10 years, there is only a 10% probability that there will be a lower flow in any given year. There is a 90% probability that the flow will be greater than the 7Q10 value. The definition of 7Q2 is the lowest average discharge over a period of one week with a recurrence interval of 2 years. Since the value of N for the 7Q2 is 2 years, there is a 50% probability that there will be a lower flow in any given year. Or, in other words, there is a 50% probability that there will be a flow greater than the 7Q2 in any given year.

Given the following record of stream flow data, estimate the 7Q10 flow for the stream. Year Lowest Seven-Day Average Flow, m3/s 1980 4.4 1981 2.8 1982 4.0 1983 3.4 1984 5.2 Solution: First arrange the flow data in decreasing order of magnitude and assign a “rank” or m value to each flow, beginning with 1 and increasing sequentially. In the case of “ties” assign the tied scores the average of the tied ranks.

For example, the following data 2. 6, 3. 2, 3. 2 3. 2 and 4 For example, the following data 2.6, 3.2, 3.2 3.2 and 4.5 m3/s would be ranked 1 for 4.5, and 3 for each of the 3.2 values and 5 for the 2.6 value. Had there only been two 3.2 values the average rank would have been 2.5 for each of these values. The probability of observing an equal or higher flow in any given year is estimated by dividing the rank m by the number of years of record plus 1 (n+1); in this example n = 5. In formula form the probability P = m/(n+1). Low Flow, m3/s Rank Probability 5.2 1 1/6=0.167 4.4 2 2/6=0.333 4.0 3 3/6=0.500 3.4 4 4/6=0.667 2.8 5 5/6=0.833

Plot the data on log probability paper with the y-axis as the Yearly 7-Consecutive Day Low Flow, m3/s, and the x-axis as the Probability of a Larger Flow.

If an industry is discharging 2 If an industry is discharging 2.5 m3 into the receiving system represented by the calculations we just made i.e. a 7Q10 of 2.72 and a 7Q2 of 4.0 m3/sec at what percent effluent does the industry have to pass the WET requirements in their NPDES permit? Calculations: 7Q10 2.5 m3 + 2.72 m3 = 5.22 m3 2.53/5.22 = 48% under low flow conditions the effluent could not occupy more than 48% the flow of the receiving system. 7Q2 2.5 m3 + 4.0 m3/sec = 6.5 m3/sec 2.53/6.5 m3/sec = 39% under low flow conditions the effluent could not occupy more than 39% of the flow of the receiving system.

Using the methodology given above determine both the 7Q10 and the 7Q2 flow for the data shown in the Table on the next page. The data represent the lowest seven-day average flow m3/s for the year shown. How is this determined? Generally the USGS defines a water year as the period from October 1 to September 30. Low flow calculations (e.g. 7Q10) are calculated based on data collected between April 1 and March 31.

Year Lowest Seven-Day Ave. Flow m3/s 1973 5.6 1974 4.3 1975 2.1 1976 6.7 1977 6.2 1978 6.9 1979 3.1 1980 4.1 1981 5.1 1982 4.9 1983 4.7 1984 3.9 1985 1986 1987 2.8 1988 1989 7.2 1990 7.1 1991 6.4 1992 1993 4.4

Rank High to Low Low Flow m3/s Rank Probability