Monetary Theory: Monetarists v. Keynesians ECO 285 – Macroeconomics – Dr. D. Foster

Friedman & the Monetarist View We can imagine a “market” for money… --money demand depends on income (mostly) and on interest rates (slightly) --money supply affects spending directly: MS – Excess MS - AD [PQ in short run] The Fed buys bonds, Banks have more reserves, Banks make more loans, Spending goes up across economy. Note MS≡MD.

Money and Aggregate Demand Equation of exchange: An accounting identity: Ms * V = P * Q Quantity theory of money: (MD  Ms) * V = P * Q where MD  Ms Velocity is constant Q is at full employment Therefore, changes in M will only change P. Aggregate Demand for output (AD) can be derived from the demand for money.

AS/AD, the Money Supply and Long Run Equilibrium MS and that increases AD. MS and that decreases AD. P AS1 Shifts in AD can only change the price level and not real output (nor employment). “Inflation is always, and everywhere, a monetary phenomenon.” -Milton Friedman P1 AD1 Q or R-GDP

Velocity of M1: 1970 - 2017 2017 Q3: 5.5

Velocity of M2: 1970 - 2017 2017 Q3: 1.43

Velocity of MZM: 1970 - 2017 2017 Q3: 1.296

Monetarist vs. Keynesian What are the initial causes of a recession?  Money Supply  Investment The Fed as source. Lack of “animal spirits.” How fast can the economy recover? Very fast. Not very fast. Gov’t as source of disruption. Market instability. Markets are quite robust. May have long-term unemployment problem. How does monetary policy help? It has a direct effect on consumer spending. Works through effects on investment spending. Very powerful. Likely ineffective. “Pushing on a string.”

Monetarist vs. Keynesian Should the government aid in the recovery from recession? No. Yes. Use rules. Use discretion. Monetary rules will provide the necessary effect. Fiscal policies, especially gov’t spending are best. What about increase both government spending and taxes, to maintain a balanced budget?  Government spending has dubious effects.  Government spending is the key to success.  Taxes will slow down economic growth.  Taxes will be more than offset by  gov’t spending.

Keynesian vs. Monetarist & the SR AS AD1 P Q or R-GDP ASLR P1 Q* AS - Monetarist The AS is flat in the Keynesian view and steep according to the Monetarists. AS - Keynes So, a decrease in the AD will have different consequences in the two theories. AD2

Persistent inflation & inflationary expectations The Fed tries to reduce unemployment and increase output by MS. This AD. AS4 AS3 AS2 P AS5 AD2 AD2 AS1 P4 With a lag, the AS will decrease so all we see is P. P3 The Fed keeps trying, but now no lag in AS. P2 If the Fed stops inflationary expectations will continue to AS, now Q. P1 AD1 Q or R-GDP Q*

Keynes & the Paradox of Thrift Savings role in the economy is negative! Why? Because income is determined by spending. If we increase our saving (overall) that means we are decreasing our consumption spending. C will decrease income/employment/production. This will C further (the multiplier effect). As income falls, so to does savings!!! Why does this happen? In Keynesian model, saving isn’t automatically channeled into investment.

Current Problems & Policy Questions AD’’’ Decreased AD sends us into recession. Prices ASLR ASSR Fed expands the MS to stimulate economic growth. Doesn’t work. P3 Eventually, there’s an overreaction. P1 AD Q’ P2 AD’’ Sharply rising AD leads to high levels of inflation. AD’ What will be the effect of the Fed’s having MB to $4 tr and ER to $2.6 tr? Q = Real GDP Q* Was Obama a Keynesian?

Monetary Theory: Monetarists v. Keynesians ECO 285 – Macroeconomics – Dr. D. Foster