Never make these Debate Mistakes II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Straw Man Allison & Summer.
Advertisements

Logical Fallacies.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
Using Persuasive Technique and Avoiding Fallacy Mrs. Gatz English 9.
Ch. 13 & 14 Informative Speaking and Persuasive Speaking
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
Oral Communications Analysis and Evaluation. California Content Standards Analysis and Evaluation of Oral and Media Communications 1.13 Analyze the four.
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
AP Language & Composition 9/28/11
Debate: Claims. Claims Each claim is a statement within the argument that the arguer needs accepted. These statements are given to logically lead the.
AP English Language and Composition
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
Definition Review Diversion and Distortion Tactics
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Paulina Cabrera, Celina Palafox, Daniela Gomez, Cynthia Avalos.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
Old Fallacies, Emotional Fallacies, Groupthink Sign In HW Due Quiz! Review Quiz! Fallacies Review New Emotional Fallacies Fallacies and evaluating arguments.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Unit 2 What is international governance?
The government has a right to spy on its citizens in order to better protect its citizens. This image is courtesy of healthinforwars.blogspot.com.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Logical Fallacies.
How can I find a topic for my research report?
SELECTING DEBATE PATTERNS, ATTACKING FALLACIES, & REFUTATION
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
College English Yichun Liu
What is a logical fallacy?
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Debate: Claims.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Logical Fallacies.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Errors in Reasoning.
Fallacies Flaws in Reasoning.
Workshop for Debate Teachers
What is a logical fallacy?
Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacies.
Persuasive Writing.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Fallacies Implicit or explicit arguments that: Ignore logic and reason
Thinking Critically What are the jobs you identified with your 3 people? What are the 6 misconceptions? Describe a way that mathematics is involved in.
Propaganda in Animal Farm and the Media
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
The Formal Argument.
The In-Class Critical Essay
Public Forum Debate Format
A fallacy in logical argumentation Or An error in reasoning
World Schools Style (WSS)
Debate Mistakes II: Strawman
Cultural Relativism Different cultures have different moral codes.
Logical Fallacies Part 4.
Common Logical Fallacies
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
What is a thesis statement? A thesis statement:
Things NOT to Do in Writing and Speaking
The government has a right to spy on its citizens in order to better protect its citizens. This image is courtesy of healthinforwars.blogspot.com.
Logical fallacies.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Presentation transcript:

Never make these Debate Mistakes II

Logical Fallacy A "fallacy" is a mistake, and a "logical" fallacy is a mistake in reasoning. There are, of course, other types of mistake than mistakes in reasoning. For instance, factual mistakes are sometimes referred to as "fallacies".

circular reasoning Latin - circulus in probando "Circular Reasoning is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stronger terms. In this fallacy, the reason given is nothing more than a restatement of the conclusion that poses as the reason for the conclusion."

circular reasoning Wellington is in New Zealand. Therefore, Wellington is in New Zealand

circular reasoning “Whatever is less dense than water will float, because whatever is less dense than water will float" sounds stupid, but "Whatever is less dense than water will float, because such objects won't sink in water" might pass.

Straw man A straw man is a common type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on the misrepresentation of an opponent's argument. To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.

Straw man The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.

Straw man This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery, entertaining "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or understanding both sides of the issue.

Straw man EXAMPLES Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate: A: We should relax the laws on beer. B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only for immediate gratification.

Straw man EXAMPLES The proposal was to relax laws on beer. Person B has exaggerated this to a position harder to defend, i.e., "unrestricted access to intoxicants". It is a logical fallacy because Person A never made that claim.

Straw man EXAMPLES A: Sunny days are good. B: If all days were sunny, we'd never have rain, and without rain, we'd have famine and death. In this case, B falsely frames A's claim to imply that A believes only sunny days are good, and B argues against that assertion. A actually asserts that sunny days are good and, in fact, says nothing about rainy days.

Five Straw Men Obama Used in West Point Foreign Policy Address 1. Those who believe America is in decline Obama assured West Point graduates that “America has rarely been stronger relative to the rest of the world” and those who think differently are just wrong. “Those who argue otherwise – who suggest that America is in decline, or has seen its global leadership slip away – are either misreading history or engaged in partisan politics,” he said. Reference: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/05/28/Five-Straw-Men-Used-by-President-Obama-in-His-Foreign-Policy-Speech-at-West-Point

Five Straw Men Obama Used in West Point Foreign Policy Address 2. Those who warn against foreign entanglements President Obama pointed out that throughout history, foreign policy has fallen into two camps, one of which were “self-described realists” who were reluctant to go to war. “[T]here have been those who warned against foreign entanglements that do not touch directly on our security or economic well-being,” he said.  Remember when President Obama was in this camp? Not anymore.

Five Straw Men Obama Used in West Point Foreign Policy Address 3. Those who want to intervene around the globe “A different view, from interventionists on the left and right, says we ignore these conflicts at our own peril,” Obama said. Not surprisingly, Obama believes that “neither view fully speaks to the demands of this moment.” 

Five Straw Men Obama Used in West Point Foreign Policy Address 4. Those who will send troops into war to avoid looking weak Obama boldly knocks down this straw men with a swift stroke.  “I would betray my duty to you, and to the country we love, if I sent you into harm’s way simply because I saw a problem somewhere in the world that needed fixing, or because I was worried about critics who think military intervention is the only way for America to avoid looking weak.” Key word is “simply” - it’s not that simple. 

Five Straw Men Obama Used in West Point Foreign Policy Address 5. Those who are skeptical of multilateral action These straw men think that going to NATO and the UN is futile and a waste of time. Not Obama. “Of course, skeptics often downplay the effectiveness of multilateral action. For them, working through international institutions, or respecting international law, is a sign of weakness. I think they’re wrong.”