Observing with Modern Observatories (the data flow)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A.Micol IVOA Registry REGISTRY WG Mar 2003 A Science Case (and 1000 Questions) for the IVOA Registry.
Advertisements

CASDA Virtual Observatory CSIRO ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Arkadi Kosmynin 11 March 2014.
Ranking and priorities | | Michael Hilker Ranking of service mode observations and relative priorities Michael Hilker.
© 2010 Bennett, McRobb and Farmer1 Use Case Description Supplementary material to support Bennett, McRobb and Farmer: Object Oriented Systems Analysis.
MAST-VizieR/NED cross correlation tutorial 1. Introduction Figure 1: Screenshot of the MAST VizieR Catalog Search Form. or enter here as object class:
Content  Overview of Computer Networks (Wireless and Wired)  IP Address, MAC Address and Workgroups  LAN Setup and Creating Workgroup  Concept on.
NOAO/Gemini Data workshop – Tucson,  Hosted by CADC in Victoria, Canada.  Released September 2004  Gemini North data from May 2000  Gemini.
1 The World Wide Web. 2  Web Fundamentals  Pages are defined by the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) and contain text, graphics, audio, video and software.
Hubble Legacy Archive Lee Quick - TIPS meeting July 19, 2012 Goals Data History Current Work Demo.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
Data Management Subsystem: Data Processing, Calibration and Archive Systems for JWST with implications for HST Gretchen Greene & Perry Greenfield.
E. Solano Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC) I.P. Observatorio Virtual Español El Observatorio Virtual: una infraestructura básica para la investigación.
ALMA Operations and the North American ALMA Science Center Al Wootten NRAO.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
50mm Telescope ACS Course Garching, 15 th to 19 th January 2007 January 2007Garching.
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Peer Review June 18, 2014.
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
2-1 DMS Requirements Status Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer Nov. 6, 2013 S&OC Data Management System Design Review 3.
Innovations in the Multimission Archive at STScI (MAST) M. Corbin, M. Donahue, C. Imhoff, T. Kimball, K. Levay, P. Padovani, M. Postman, M. Smith, R. Thompson.
How to Adapt existing Archives to VO: the ISO and XMM-Newton cases Research and Scientific Support Department Science Operations.
Prototype system of the Japanese Virtual Observatory The Japanese Virtual Observatory (JVO) aims at providing easy access to federated astronomical databases.
IVC : a simulation and model-fitting tool for optical-IR interferometry Abstract I present a new software tool, called “Interferometry Visibility Computations”
Astronomical Spectroscopy and the Virtual Observatory ESAC, March 2007 VO tools and cross-calibration Pedro García-Lario European Space Astronomy.
July 16, 2004P. Padovani, NEON Archive School Science with multi-wavelength Archival Data Paolo Padovani (ESO) Virtual Observatory Systems Department &
Introduction to the ESA Planetary Science Archive  Jose Luis Vázquez (ESAC/ESA)  Dave Heather (ESTEC/ESA)  Joe Zender (ESTEC/ESA)
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
What is the VSO? (and what isn’t it?). The VSO …  Allows you to search multiple archives in a single search  Keeps you from needing to keep track of.
06/30/ Data Product Service (DPS) Packaging and Context Dan Crichton Steve Hughes Ron Joyner Chris Mattman Paul Ramirez Peter Shames.
Making Press Release Astronomical Images NVO Compliant Lisa M. Frattare Space Telescope Science Institute Communicating Astronomy with the Public June.
Common Archive Observation Model (CAOM) What is it and why does JWST care?
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA WFC3 and StarView
Nov Common Archive Observation Model What is CAOM and why should MAST use it? Brian McLean.
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
The International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA) interoperability in action.
Slide 1 Archive Computing: Scalable Computing Environments on Very Large Archives Andreas J. Wicenec 13-June-2002.
Data Archives: Migration and Maintenance Douglas J. Mink Telescope Data Center Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory NSF
HARPS Data Flow System Christophe Lovis Geneva Observatory HARPS-N PDR, 6-7 December 2007, Cambridge MA.
Introduction to EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2006Dec05/06EVLA M&C Transition Software CDR2 EVLA Computing (Terse) History The original EVLA Phase I proposal.
06-1L ASTRO-E2 ASTRO-E2 User Group - 14 February, 2005 Astro-E2 Archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
NEON School NEON Archive Observing School Alberto Micol ESA Space Telescope Operations Division 15 July 04 ESO & HST Archives.
ESO Reflex A Graphical Workflow Engine for Data Reduction Richard Hook Euro VO Data Centres Alliance Theory & Grid Workshop, Garching, April 2008.
Fermi Users Group Meeting Goddard Space Flight Center, February 6, 2009C. Shrader, NASA/GSFC 1 Fermi Users Group FSSC News Chris Shrader, Fermi Science.
8 th Semester, Batch 2009 Department Of Computer Science SSUET.
1 SUZAKU HUG 12-13April, 2006 Suzaku archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
Publishing Combined Image & Spectral Data Packages Introduction to MEx M. Sierra, J.-C. Malapert, B. Rino VO ESO - Garching Virtual Observatory Info-Workshop.
E0262 MIS - Multimedia Playback Systems Anandi Giridharan Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – , India.
Observations with AMBER  General overview  P2VM  OB preparation with P2PP P2PP / OB / templates Available templates for observation procedure Typical.
Faculty meeting - 13 Dec 2006 The Hubble Legacy Archive Harald Kuntschner & ST-ECF staff 13 December 2006.
HSC Queue Mode Implementation Plan ~ Stage I, II, III ~ Tae-Soo Pyo Subaru Telescope /01/15.
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
Data Infrastructure in the TeraGrid Chris Jordan Campus Champions Presentation May 6, 2009.
Science Gateway- 13 th May Science Gateway Use Cases/Interfaces D. Sanchez, N. Neyroud.
Chapter 25 – Configuration Management 1Chapter 25 Configuration management.
Data Centres in the Virtual Observatory Age
Visit for more Learning Resources
Concluding Remarks Paolo Padovani Head, Virtual Observatory Project Office, ESO, Garching bei München, Germany & EURO-VO Facility Centre.
JCMT Observation Management Project
Understanding the OSI Reference Model
ESO Phase 1 & 2 Procedures Gaitee Hussain
Observing with Modern Observatories
Intermountain West Data Warehouse
Scheduling Toolkit Observation Scheduling Boyd Waters, NRAO
Gustaaf van Moorsel September 9, 2003
Observatory Science Operations
Observatory Science Operations
The New Internet2 Network: Expected Uses and Application Communities
Data Management Components for a Research Data Archive
OSI Reference Model Unit II
OSI Model 7 Layers 7. Application Layer 6. Presentation Layer
Presentation transcript:

Observing with Modern Observatories (the data flow) NEON School 2004 Observing with Modern Observatories (the data flow)

Lecture Layout Proposal Submission Phase I Phase II Observation Observing modes The proposal submission The OPC selection Long term scheduling “Web Letters” Phase II P2PP, OBs, etc. Observation Short-term scheduling Data acquisition

Lecture Layout Archival Connecting meta data to pixels Data shipment (or replication) to Garching Quality Control Preparation of master calibration files Preparation of reduced products for PIs of service mode programs Archive use Data distribution to PIs Data distribution to archive users

The data flow: Another View

The Data Flow User Support Group The ESO Data Flow Model and its Supporting Organizational Structure Paranal/La Silla Observatories Phase II proposal submission observing blocks medium term schedule Operations Technical Support Data Archive & Supporting Databases storage and re-distribution PI packages distribution Phase I proposal submission program selection time allocation Observation short term schedule archival of data Quality Control Master Cal files prod. Instrument trending PI products preparation Data Flow Operations Group

Phase I: Proposal Submission Provide information: Identification of PI/CoIs Facilities to be used Split program in “runs” per facility/group of targets Observing preferences Scientific Justification OPC selection: Peer review of proposal Below or above threshold? Long term scheduling “Web Letters” Did I get time or not? Message sent to all PI with link to explanations program run

Phase I: Observing Modes Two observing modes: “Visitor” mode Keep contact with telescope and instrumentation (observing should not become a black box/magic activity) Need to use a specific observing mode Need to be able to assess quality and react immediately “Service” mode Program is to use normal, supported instrument modes Program requires multiple visits of the targets Program has lots of targets spread in r.a. space

Phase II: Send Details Provide detailed information: About each RUN in the PROGRAM About each target in the proposal About instrument settings to be used Define observing sequence Define exposure times, filters, constraints (e.g., on the seeing) ==> Observing block (OBs) program run OB

Observation Steps in the observation sequence: OBs sent to La Silla/Paranal Short term scheduling to match required target visibility, moon brightness, seeing, … with prevailing conditions OB execution ==> exposures Two types of exposures: calibration and science program run OB exposure

Archival Connecting meta-data to pixels Collecting telescope, environment, instrument and user provided details Building a header with this information according to a pre-defined dictionary. Assembling header and pixels into a FITS file. Sending file to the archive system Storing the file onto the archive medium (DVD, Mag disk) Decomposing header and storing info into database Replicating database to Garching Sending archive media to Garching

Data Quality Control Building calibration database Assembling master flats, darks, biases Sending those to the archive for future Preparing calibrated science products For each run, build a structure with raw, calibration and calibrated data for the PIs of service mode runs. Send a “pack & send” signal to the archive

The Archive Collects data: Information about PIs, programs, runs, OBs, exposures Pixel data (raw science and calibration files) Distributes data: Proprietary data to PIs Public data to anyone

The Data Flow User Support Group The ESO Data Flow Model and its Supporting Organizational Structure Paranal/La Silla Observatories Phase II proposal submission observing blocks medium term schedule Operations Technical Support Data Archive & Supporting Databases storage and re-distribution PI packages distribution Phase I proposal submission program selection time allocation Observation short term schedule archival of data Quality Control Master Cal files prod. Instrument trending PI products preparation Data Flow Operations Group

The Archive: Content Contains ESO and HST raw data Started operations in 1991 Growth never stopped Need to constantly adapt to new storage technology to keep costs low Need to frequently adapt to current software user interfaces to provide users with better search tools (more and more data) Need to look for “advanced” products to empower users with doing science

The Archive: Content

The Archive: Output Data retrieval model is that of the Web Shop: Browse catalog Mark articles of interests Go to “cashier” Select delivery options Confirm submission

Request Submission: 1) Browse

Archive: Selection of Frames of interest

The Archive: Selecting Request Options

The Archive: Output

Technical vs. Science Archive Two types of Archives Technical vs. Science Archive Current system more tuned to serve the operational needs of the Observatory (data collection and distribution to internal/external users) Science users still mostly left out (emphasis on raw data) Discrepancy understood early by the VO “founding fathers” Need to provide access to well-described, instrumental signature-free data Need to provide hassle-free access to different archives without affecting their operation critical mission Science users will get better products and access through the VO

Archives for the people! The three layers Separate the mission critical support role from the delivery of products Leave the science service provision to the VO Provide interfaces to the top layers (e.g., image and spectra access protocols, high-level data processing grids) Virtual Observatory VO tools and facilities Instrumental signature-free data “Real” Observatory Data In/Out

Technical vs. Science Archive Two type of archives Technical vs. Science Archive Archive downloads continue to increase, but usage increasingly technical: Multiple data deliveries to PIs/CoIs Easy retrieval of own data Streamlining of internal data channels Science usage still limited: ESO Archive still has too few instrumental signature-free products to offer Astronomers will produce archive-based science if they are paid and/or supported! (e.g., Hubble’s archive proposals, ASTROVIRTEL)

On-going efforts in the ESO archive News from the “technical” archive: Efforts on-going to put more reduced products available Better web-based search screens under development Data available world-wide probably in 2005 (ESO Council to decide) News from the “VO” side @ ESO: On-going efforts to provide a multi-archive query system (Querator) Image and spectral VO access implemented as soon as standards approved Extra ESO resources arriving soon to help with all of the above