ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASEP -- Proposal for CVT -- GRB informal meeting # January 2009 JASIC GRBIG-ASEP
Advertisements

R59 : ASEP P. Steenackers / R. Valgaeren56 th GRB 4 SEP 2012 Informal document GRB (56th GRB, 3-5 September 2012, agenda item 4)
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
Regulation No. 96 Proposal for 03 Series of Amendments GRPE, January 2011 Informal document No. GRPE (61st GRPE, January 2011, agenda item.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
Principles of Revision of ECE Regulation No. 59 Submitted by CLEPA Informal document No. GRB-42-8 (42nd GRB, 5-7 September 2005, agenda item.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
19-21 September 2011 JASIC Kei-truck of N1 Informal document GRB (54th GRB, September 2011, agenda item 3(b))
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
1 NL ASEP proposal Presentation to GRB version issued by the Netherlands GRB 50; September 2009 Informal document No. GRB (50th GRB, 1 – 3.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
GTR amendments Japan #14 WLTP IWG at Paris WLTP-14-08e.
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
“Reference Sound Assessment”
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Informal document No. GRB-50-06
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Fuel Cell Vehicles - Required corrections in xxx-2016
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Full load curve proposal
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
Replacement exhaust systems
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP Annex 7 General Process Subroutine Vehicle Testing Subroutine
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
INFORMAL GROUP ON GASEOUS FUEL VEHICLES Within the UN GRPE (WP29)
CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Presentation transcript:

ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT GRB-69-16, informal document by IMMA ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT Issue with the proposed Supplement the 08 series of amendments to UN R9, as in GRB-68-22 (= WP29-2019-006) Background of IMMA proposal for revised exemption window, as in GRB-69-14

Exemption zone extension Current Exemption zone Required ASEP test zone ASEP Test 1 Required ASEP test zone ASEP Test 2 Proposed Exemption zone extension Non exempt Proposed Exemption zone extension To align the parameters for exemption of vehicles “with variable gear ratios or automatic transmission with non-lockable gear ratios” in Annex 6, §1.2 with the test conditions for “ASEP Test 1” (Annex 6, 3.3.2) and “ASEP Test 2” (Annex 6, 3.3.3), in order to close potential gaps between the applicable engine rpm range for the ASEP tests and the engine rpm range for exemption from ASEP testing. Not closing these gaps would result in a situation where some vehicles “with variable gear ratios or automatic transmission with non-lockable gear ratios” would not be excluded from ASEP testing, but would also not be able to remain within the conditions for ASEP Test 1 and ASEP Test 2.

Test result Vehicle L5 with CVT PMR = 83,1 W/kg

Verification of ASEP exemption L5 with CVT and PMR = 83,1 W/kg Verification of ASEP exemption With originally proposal exemption window (as in GRB-68-22) BB’ outside exemption range: Vehicle not exempted from ASEP testing

IMMA proposal for revised exemption window (= GRB-69-14) UN R9, Annex 6, paragraph 1.2., amend to read   Vehicles with variable gear ratios or automatic transmission with non-lockable gear ratios are exempted from the requirements of this Annex, if the vehicle manufacturer provides technical documents to the Type Approval Authority showing, that the vehicle's engine speed at BB' does neither exceed 1.15*nBB'_ref (nBB' + 0.05 * (nrated – nidle)) nor fall below 0.85*nBB'_ref (nBB' – 0.05 * (nrated – nidle)) for any test condition inside the ASEP control range defined in paragraph 2.5. below, where nBB’_ref is calculated in accordance to paragraph 3.3.1. of this Annex.(nBB' is the average engine speed at BB' from the two valid acceleration tests according to paragraphs 2. and 3. of Annex 3.) 

With IMMA proposal for revised exemption window (as in GRB-69-14) L5 with CVT and PMR = 83,1 W/kg Verification of ASEP exemption With IMMA proposal for revised exemption window (as in GRB-69-14) 4294 5810 BB’ inside exemption range: Vehicle exempted from ASEP testing