Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for comments on section 10.11.4.3, Differential PSK with spreading] Date Submitted: [September 2010] Source: [Kiran Bynam] Company [Samsung Electronics] Address [Bagmane Tech Park, Block-B, Bangalore, India] Voice:[+91-80-41819999], FAX: [+91-80-41819000], E-Mail:[kiran.bynam@samsung.com] Re: [Proposed Resolution of D0 Comment S10-430] Abstract: [Comment resolution] Purpose: [To change the text and euqations as per the IEEE normative text policies] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Proposed Resolution of D0 Comment S10-430 Kiran Bynam

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> D0 Comment S10-430 Comment: Link to PSDU timing parameters is not clear Sub-clause 10.11.4.3, page 182, Line 3 Resolution Proposed: Give a write up in PSDU timing parameters saying that 6,7 (R0,R1, R2) data rates use the section 10.11.4.3 <author>, <company>

Proposed Resolution(s) <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Proposed Resolution(s) Please add the following line in section 10.10, page 173, Line 12 The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R0, R1, R2) as 0 to 5 shall be as defined in 10.11.4.1. The Modulation for the data rates represented by 3 bits (R0, R1, R2) as 6 to 7 shall be as defined in 10.11.4.3. <author>, <company>

Comment: Understanding of the scheme not clear <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> D0 Comment S10-426 Comment: Understanding of the scheme not clear Sub-clause 10.11.4.3, page 182, Line 3 Resolution Proposed: Can be explained with diagram Slide 5 Page 5 <author>, <company>

Please add this figure in 10.11.4.3 <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Proposed Resolutions Please add this figure in 10.11.4.3 Spreaded DBPSK/ DQPSK Pulse Shaping RF Front end SHR+PHR+PSDU Slide 6 Page 6 <author>, <company>

D0 Comment S10-555 Comment: Modify eq. accordingly. <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> D0 Comment S10-555 Comment: Modify eq. accordingly. Sub-clause 10.11.4.3, page 181, Line 17 Resolution proposed 1. h should be written in a way consistent with 10.11.2 - h^{(m)}. 2. k should be omitted, since there is no mention, yet alone definition, of other BANs hopping sequences. The standard is dealing with only one BAN. 3. T_w should multiply h^{(m)} in order for (90) to be correct. Slide 7 Page 7 <author>, <company>

Proposed Resolutions Replace the equation 90 with following <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Proposed Resolutions Replace the equation 90 with following and sentence “ is time hopping sequence of kth BAN” as is time hopping sequence” at Slide 8 Page 8 <author>, <company>

Comment: specify barker sequence <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> D0 Comment s10-633, S10-634 Comment: specify barker sequence Sub-clause 10.11.4.3, page 182, Line 2 Slide 9 Page 9 <author>, <company>

<month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Proposed Resolutions Replace the text “b(i) is Barker code of length NB” with Barker sequence “b(i) is [1 1 1-1 -1 1 -1] of length 7 (NB) “ Slide 10 Page 10 <author>, <company>

S10-196, s10-314, s10-398 Comment: "Seq_m" is not the best notation. Also Barker sequence should be explicitly specified in equation 90, 91, 92 in page 181, 182

Resolution Seqm(i) to be replaced by sm(i) Replace Seq-1(i) =1 , for all I with s-1 =[1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1]