Michelle Sabourin, Creighton T. Tuzon, Virginia A. Zakian 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Paul C Megee, Cathy Mistrot, Vincent Guacci, Douglas Koshland 
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Takashi Kubota, Kohei Nishimura, Masato T. Kanemaki, Anne D. Donaldson 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
DNA Degradation at Unprotected Telomeres in Yeast Is Regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) Cell-Cycle Kinase  Momchil D. Vodenicharov, Raymund J. Wellinger 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
A Role for REP Sequences in Regulating Translation
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
A Role for H2B Ubiquitylation in DNA Replication
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
A Role for H2B Ubiquitylation in DNA Replication
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Taz1 Enforces Cell-Cycle Regulation of Telomere Synthesis
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
The role of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in telomerase- mediated lengthening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres  Yasumasa Tsukamoto, Andrew K.P Taggart,
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Nancy L. Maas, Kyle M. Miller, Lisa G. DeFazio, David P. Toczyski 
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Robin M. Ricke, Anja-Katrin Bielinsky  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Telomerase and Tel1p Preferentially Associate with Short Telomeres in S. cerevisiae  Michelle Sabourin, Creighton T. Tuzon, Virginia A. Zakian  Molecular Cell  Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 550-561 (August 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generating a Single Short Telomere (A) The endogenous telomere VII-L was modified as described for Lev220 (Marcand et al., 1999). The Flp1p recombinase is induced by addition of galactose. Its action removes the DNA between the two FRT sites and releases it as a nonreplicating circle, leaving behind a single FRT site and a telomere that contains only ∼100 bp of telomeric C1-3A/TG1-3 DNA. By restreaking postgalactose cells and screening for those that have lost the ability to grow in the absence of uracil we generated a control strain (B) for each experimental strain (A). Relevant restriction enzyme sites are indicated (X, XhoI; S, StuI; V, EcoRV; P, PstI; H, HindIII; S, StuI; and V, EcoRV). Drawing not to scale. (B) Schematic of experimental protocol. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding of Est2p and Est1p Is Increased at Short Telomere VII-L in a TEL1-Dependent Manner After α factor arrest and induction of telomere shortening, cells expressing either Myc-tagged Est2p (A–C) or Myc-tagged Est1p (D–F) were released into the cell cycle and samples were taken at multiple time points throughout the subsequent synchronous cell cycle for ChIP. In each panel, open symbols are binding in strain A and closed symbols are binding in strain B. Error bars indicate standard deviations and are provided for every data point. The sequence being PCR amplified is indicated in bold in the upper right corner of each panel. (A) Est2p binding to short (open squares) differed from WT (closed squares) telomere VII-L in a statistically significant manner from 52.5 to 90 min (p values = 0.0022–0.045). The large standard deviations at the 52.5 and 60 min time points are due to the fact that the exact timing of the peak of Est2p binding varied between independent synchronies. In the four different synchronies analyzed here, the average enrichment of Est2p at short telomere VII-L at its S phase peak was 3.1× over binding to WT telomere VII-L at the same time point, with a range of 2–4.4×. (B) Est2p binding to unmodified telomere VI-R (triangles) was statistically indistinguishable in strains A and B. (C) Est2p binding to telomere VII-L in tel1Δ cells. Without TEL1, Est2p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was statistically indistinguishable from binding to WT telomere VII-L (closed squares), except at 90 min, when the p value was 0.0035. Inset, the 30–75 min time points are shown at a different scale versus no-tag control (circles). (D) Est1p binding to short (open squares) differed from WT (closed squares) telomere VII-L in a statistically significant manner from 37.5 to 90 min (p values = 0.00041–0.039). Error bars represent the standard deviations for the values above and below the mean calculated separately. (E) Est1p binding to unmodified telomere VI-R (triangles) was statistically indistinguishable in strains A and B. (F) Est1p binding to telomere VII-L in tel1Δ cells. Without TEL1, Est1p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was statistically indistinguishable from binding to WT telomere VII-L (closed squares). Inset as in (C). Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Telomere Binding of Ku80p, Cdc13p, and Rif1p Is Unaffected by Telomere Length Experimental details are the same as in Figure 2 legend. (A) Ku80p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was statistically indistinguishable from binding to WT telomere VII-L (closed squares). (B) Cdc13p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was statistically indistinguishable from binding to WT telomere VII-L (closed squares). (C) Rif1p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was statistically indistinguishable from binding to WT-length telomere VII-L (closed squares), except at 0 min (p value = 0.023) and 30 min (p value = 0.029); other p values were 0.09–0.98. (D–F) Binding of Ku80p (D), Cdc13p (E), and Rif1p (F) to unmodified telomere VI-R was statistically indistinguishable in strains A (open triangles) and B (closed triangles). Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rif2p Binding Is Reduced at the Short VII-L Telomere Error bars represent standard deviations and are provided for each data point. (A) Rif2p binding to short telomere VII-L (open squares) was lower than binding to WT-length telomere VII-L (closed squares) (p values = 0.00046–0.032), except at 90 min (p value = 0.23). (B) Rif2p binding to unmodified telomere VI-R (triangles) was statistically indistinguishable in strains A and B, except at 30 min (p value = 0.009 at 30 min; p values were 0.06–0.45 at other points). (C) Rap1p binding to telomere VII-L (VII-L), telomere VI-R (VI-R), and the FLP circle product (URA3) was monitored in α factor-arrested cells after galactose induction of telomere shortening in strains A (open bars) and B (closed bars). Binding to short telomere VII-L was reduced ∼50% relative to WT VII-L in a statistically significant manner (p value < 0.0001). When the values of Rap1p binding to the FLP circle product were added to the values for the short telomere VII-L (hatched bars), they were statistically indistinguishable from the levels of Rap1p at WT telomere VII-L (closed bars; p value = 0.0569). (D) When the values of Rif2p binding to the FLP circle product were added to the values for short telomere VII-L (open diamonds), they were statistically indistinguishable from the levels of Rif2p at WT telomere VII-L (closed squares; p values = 0.16–0.45). (E) Binding of Est2p (open circles), Rif1p (open squares), and Rif2p (open triangles) to the FLP circle product. Because there is no circle in the control B strains, closed symbols show the background binding to ura3-1 in these strains. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Tel1p Preferentially Binds Short Telomeres Error bars represent standard deviations and are provided for each data point. (A) Tel1p bound preferentially to short (open squares) relative to WT (closed squares) telomere VII-L in a statistically significant manner throughout the cell cycle (p values = 5.6 × 10−6 to 0.031). (B) Binding of Tel1p to unmodified telomere VI-R was statistically indistinguishable in strains A (open triangles) and B (closed triangles). Binding of Tel1p to VI-R (and WT telomere VII-L in A) at 52.5 and 60 min was significantly higher than binding to nontelomeric ARO1 DNA (p values ranged from 1.1 × 10−6 to 0.028). Inset is as in Figure 2C. (C) Binding of Tel1p in strain A to short telomere VII-L (squares) and unmodified telomere VI-R (triangles) across two cell cycles (20 min time points from 0 to 180 min). (D) Representative western blot for Clb2p using a polyclonal α-Clb2p antibody. Samples as in (C). Lane 1: A, asynchronous cells; lanes 2–11, 0–180 min after release from α factor arrest. Marker size is indicated at the right (kD). (E) Representative RNR1 RNA quantitation using RT-PCR. Samples are as in (C) and (D). Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Preferential Binding of Both Tel1p and Telomerase to Short Telomeres Is Dependent on the MRX Complex Error bars represent standard deviations and are provided for each data point. Binding of Tel1p (A) and Est2p (B) to short telomere VII-L (open triangles) and WT telomere VI-R (closed triangles) in strain A cells with the xrs2-664 truncation is shown graphed versus the previously determined levels of binding at short (open squares) and WT (closed squares) telomere VII-L in XRS2 strains (dotted lines) from Figures 5A and 2A, respectively. Preferential binding of both Tel1p and Est2p to short telomere VII-L is lost when Tel1p can no longer interact with the MRX complex. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions