Best Practices for Calibration and Calibration Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Adequacy Checking in the ANOVA Text reference, Section 3-4, pg
Advertisements

Page: Clarity GPC module Date: Code: P002/28A1.
Regression, Correlation. Research Theoretical empirical Usually combination of the two.
Parent Function Booklet: Linear, Quadratic, Cubic, Absolute Value
Copyright © 2015, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 EPAs New MDL Procedure What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply Richard Burrows.
Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics, 9e Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Ch. 2-1 Statistics for Business and Economics 7 th Edition Chapter 2 Describing Data:
Least Square Regression
Introduction the General Linear Model (GLM) l what “model,” “linear” & “general” mean l bivariate, univariate & multivariate GLModels l kinds of variables.
Correlation A correlation exists between two variables when one of them is related to the other in some way. A scatterplot is a graph in which the paired.
A Statistical Approach to Method Validation and Out of Specification Data.
Chap 3-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 Describing Data: Numerical Statistics for Business and Economics.
Calibration & Curve Fitting
Quality Control In Measurements Tom Colella CLAS Goldwater Environmental Lab.
ANCOVA Lecture 9 Andrew Ainsworth. What is ANCOVA?
A nonlinear hybrid fuzzy least- squares regression model Olga Poleshchuk, Evgeniy Komarov Moscow State Forest University, Russia.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, 2 nd edition. Calculating the shape of a polynomial from regression coefficients Jane E. Miller,
Copyright © 2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice eighth edition Chapter 4.
Regression Regression relationship = trend + scatter
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter Seventeen Correlation and Regression.
Data Analysis: Quantitative Statements about Instrument and Method Performance.
Exam Review Day 6 Chapters 2 and 3 Statistics of One Variable and Statistics of Two Variable.
Introduction to Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Regression and Correlation.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Curve Fitting Introduction Least-Squares Regression Linear Regression Polynomial Regression Multiple Linear Regression Today’s class Numerical Methods.
Using SPSS Note: The use of another statistical package such as Minitab is similar to using SPSS.
Method 3: Least squares regression. Another method for finding the equation of a straight line which is fitted to data is known as the method of least-squares.
Copyright © 2015, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 EPAs New MDL Procedure What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply Richard Burrows.
Criterion C- Further Mathematical Processes. HOW TO DIFFERENTIATE WHAT IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE 5 POINTS: C. Mathematical processes By: Nisleidys Gonzalez.
Statistics 350 Lecture 2. Today Last Day: Section Today: Section 1.6 Homework #1: Chapter 1 Problems (page 33-38): 2, 5, 6, 7, 22, 26, 33, 34,
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
Yandell – Econ 216 Chap 15-1 Chapter 15 Multiple Regression Model Building.
Summarizing Descriptive Relationships
Chapter 4 Basic Estimation Techniques
The 2015/2016 TNI Standard and the EPA MDL Update
Decomposition of Sum of Squares
Basic Estimation Techniques
Non-linear relationships
EPA Method A Summary of the Changes in the Newly Promulgated GC/MS Method for Volatile Organics in Wastewater Harry McCarty and Kevin Roberts CSRA,
William Lipps Analytical & Measuring Instrument Division August 2017
EPA Method Equivalency
Introduction to the General Linear Model (GLM)
Basic Estimation Techniques
EPA Method Equivalency
What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply
Linear Regression.
Collaboration on Calibration
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
BUS173: Applied Statistics
Section 10.2: Fitting a Linear Model to Data
Least Squares Fitting A mathematical procedure for finding the best-fitting curve to a given set of points by minimizing the sum of the squares of the.
Shudong Wang, NWEA Liru Zhang, Delaware DOE G. Gage Kingsbury, NWEA
Parent Functions.
Parent Functions.
Section 2: Linear Regression.
The Coefficient of Determination (R2) vs Relative Standard Error (RSE)
Best Practices for Identification and Quantitation
Francesco Riccobono, Barouch Giechaskiel, Pierre Bonnel
MATH 1310 Session 2.
Nonlinear Fitting.
Least Square Regression
11C Line of Best Fit By Eye, 11D Linear Regression
Lesson 2.2 Linear Regression.
Unit 6 Quiz: Review questions
The 2016 TNI Chemistry Standard
Business and Economics 7th Edition
Summarizing Descriptive Relationships
Regression and Correlation of Data
Review of Chapter 3 Examining Relationships
Approximation of Functions
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices for Calibration and Calibration Verification Richard Burrows TestAmerica

Volatiles GCMS 8260C / D 624.1 CLP 524.3 TNI

Minimum number of Points Method Criterion 8260D 5, 6 for quadratic 624.1 5, 6 for quadratic, 3 allowed for “some analytes” 524.4 7 CLP 5 TNI 4, average 5, linear, 6 for quadratic Best Practice 5, 6 for quadratic

Internal Standard Method Criterion 8260D Implied 624.1 Required 524.4 CLP TNI Optional Best Practice Required

Calibration types Method Criterion 8260D Average, Linear, Quadratic, Cubic 624.1 Average, Linear, Quadratic 524.4 Linear or Quadratic CLP Average TNI Average, Linear or Quadratic (Implied) Best Practice Average, Linear or Quadratic

Calibration criteria Average Method Criterion 8260D Average: RSD < 20% 624.1 Average: RSD < 35% 524.4 N/A CLP RSD < 20%, 30% or 40%, depending on analyte TNI Average: N/A Best Practice 20-30% range

Calibration criteria Regression Method Criterion 8260D Linear, Quadratic: R2 > 0.990 or RSE < 20% 624.1 Linear, Quadratic: R2 > 0.920 or RSE < 35% 524.4 Linear, Quadratic: Readback <30% or 50% at MRL CLP N/A TNI Linear, Quadratic: N/A Best Practice RSE < 20-30% or readback 30-50%

“Very common mistakes in the analytical calibration process are the use of correlation and or determination coefficients… Evaluation of analytical calibration based on least squares linear regression for instrumental Techniques, Francisco Raposo, TrAC 77, Match 2016, Pages 167-185

Calibration criteria Fudge factors Method Criterion 8260C 10% may fail but must be reported as estimated 8260D Same as 8260C but additional guidance 624.1 None 524.4 CLP @ analytes may fail must be < 40% RSD TNI N/A Best Practice 10% may fail, combined with sensitivity demonstration for non-detects

Weighting Method Criterion 8260D Optional 624.1 Required (1/X) 524.4 CLP Average only (i.e., required) TNI Best Practice 1/X or 1/X2 required

Recalc Method Criterion 8260D Should, if using linear regression 624.1 N/A 524.4 Required CLP TNI Required unless RSE Best Practice Required unless RSE

Minimum Response Factor Method Criterion 8260D Table 4 but with flexibility 624.1 N/A 524.3 CLP Table 4 TNI Best Practice Not needed

Initial Calibration Verification Method Criterion 8260C Required, second source 624.1 N/A (but see FAQ) 524.3 N/A CLP TNI Required Best Practice Required, second source

Continuing Calibration Verification Criteria Method Criterion 8260D 80-120%, 20% of analytes allowed to fail, report as estimated unless sensitivity demonstration for NDs 624.1 Table 7 (mostly 65-135%, a few outliers, eg VC 5-195%). Retest allowed 524.3 70-130% if above MRL, 50-150% at MRL CLP 20,25,30 or 35% depending on analyte TNI N/A Best Practice 70-130%, 10% allowed to fail, not more than 50-150%, report as estimated unless verification of sensitivity for NDs

Continuing Calibration RT criteria Method Criterion 8260D IS Within 30 sec of initial calibration 624.1 N/A 524.3 CLP TNI Best Practice Within 30 sec of initial calibration

Summary Method Criterion Points 5, 6 for quadratic IS Within 30 sec of initial calibration Cal types Average, Linear, Quadratic Acceptance criteria 20-30% RSD or RSE, or 30% each point, 50% at Quant limit Fudge factors 10% fail, but within a limit, (50%) report as estimated unless sensitivity verification Weighting Required, 1/X or 1/X2 Recalc Required (unless RSD or RSE) Minimum RF Not needed ICV Required, second source, 30% CCV criteria 70-130%, 10% allowed to fail, not more than 50-150%, report as estimated unless verification of sensitivity for NDs