P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom Date: 2009-06-29 Authors: Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Introduction This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for approval to send IEEE P802.11w to RevCom. Document 11-09/0795r0 was approved during the closing plenary session of the 802.11 working group on July 17, 2009. Passed in the Task Group <result> Passed in the Working Group <result> Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11w June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11w QTY % QTY % QTY % QTY % Key: “with” = “with comments” “w/o” = “without comments” Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Comments by Ballot July 2009 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 Key: SB0 = Initial sponsor ballot. SB1 = 1st recirculation ballot, etc. Coordination: comment supplied by a Mandatory coordination entity Not Required: comment indicated as not required to satisfy voter Satisfied: comment required to satisfy voter that is indicated as satisfied either by the voter indicating satisfaction with the specific comment, or by voting yes in a subsequent ballot Known Unsatisfied: a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has indicated they are unsatisfied with the comment resolution. Assumed Unsatisfied: comment not meeting any of the above criteria – i.e., a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has not responded when asked about their satisfaction with the comment resolution. Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Mandatory coordination June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Mandatory coordination Coordination Entity Draft Date Status IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC) D6.0 D9.0 Sept 08 May 09 “Meets all editorial requirements. “ Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols (SCC14) Not required Terms and Definitions (SCC10) Registration Authority Committee (RAC) Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Note In subsequent slides, “Unsatisfied comments” includes both “Known Unsatisfied” and “Assumed Unsatisfied” comments. Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Unsatisfied Comments July 2009 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 The table shows the count of unsatisfied editorial comments and technical comments separately. The comments are then classified into: A – Accepted. The comment was accepted and the change indicated by the commenter was approved. P – Accepted in Principle. The comment was accepted in principle, but a different change to the one indicated by the commenter was approved. D – Disagree. The comment was declined and no change to address the comment was approved. U – Unresolvable. S – Out of Scope. Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Unsatisfied comments by commenter June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Unsatisfied comments by commenter Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Unsatisfied Comments by Topic June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Unsatisfied Comments by Topic Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Unsatisfied comments The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the comment resolution committee received during P802.11n sponsor ballot is attached. Double click on the icon to the right to open this. A copy of this same data presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. Double click on the embedded .pdf to the right to open this. Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 Note Having filled in the blanks, the following slide will be brought to motion in the July EC meeting. Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

802.11 EC Motion – Approval to send P802.11w to RevCom June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 July 2009 802.11 EC Motion – Approval to send P802.11w to RevCom Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to forward P802.11w D11.0 to RevCom. P802.11w had a 94% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot. There are 6 disapprove voters representing 44 unsatisfied comments. Working Group vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n, <abstain> a Moved: Bruce Kraemer 2nd: <tbd> Yes No Abstain Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel