Workplan for the development of multi-risk analysis (WP7)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IS:01UDM -2 CONCEPTS IN HAZARDS TALK 1 NATURAL PHENOMENA OF LAND, SEA AND ATMOSPHERE. n HAZARD DUE TO RELEASE OF STRESS n TRIGGER EVENTS: NATURAL i.e,
Advertisements

EXERCISE IN MITIGATION DECISIONS MODULE 2 THE MULTI-HAZARD ENVIRONMENT.
Lessons Learned from the Application of Risk Management in the Shipment of LNG.
Government Industry R&D Forum March 2005 Pipeline Design & Construction Near Term Focus Future Gaps & Opportunities.
Identifying Causes of Accidents
A stocks and flows approach An Integrated Assessment Framework for Considering Climate Change: 1. the principal domains Society and Economy Greenhouse.
Protecting our environment ---==== START ====--- Loading complete!
Introduction to the ADAPT project - context Context and new elements General overview of the methodology Work plan and timing.
COMP8130 and COMP4130 Adrian Marshall Verification and Validation Risk Management Adrian Marshall.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Alvarado,Cappelletti,Puglisi,Ferrari,Kudhoos.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Fossil Fuels Chapter 11. Energy Consumption Per capita energy consumption.
Scenario Based Auditing
PPC PRESENTATION ON THE TECHNICAL REGULATIONS FOR PETROLEUM RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 27 AUGUST
1 1 Dr Jan Wright Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment 10 December 2012 Strategic issues facing New Zealand and overview of report on fracking.
Professor Peter Styles Keele University United Kingdom.
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
To Frack or not to Frack, That is the Question Fred Aminzadeh Executive Director, USC Induced Seismicity Consortium (ISC) Science Matters California Science.
Risk Assessment for Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Presented to: West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Sacramento, California September.
Current state of regulation of shale gas regulation in the UK Dr Sanna 12 March
Objectives Students will be able to:
Horizontal Drilling Video &view=article&id=8&Itemid=111
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
University of Colorado Law School June 6, 2014 Mark K. Boling President EXPLORING NEW FRAMEWORKS OF REGULATION: NEGOTIATING MODEL REGULATIONS.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
Mining in Canada.
Sept 4, 2006Risk and Public Policy Defining Risk BUSH September 4, 2006.
Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing Ben Koppelman Science Policy Centre.
The process of identifying and controlling the risks is called Risk Management.
THREE METHODS OF OBTAINING FUEL FROM THE EARTH 1)HARVESTING- PEAT, WOOD, CORN, SUGARCANE ARE USED FOR BIOMASS ENERGY GENERATION ARE USED FOR BIOMASS ENERGY.
Field Development Optimization
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Resource Extraction.
What the Frack Is Going On?
What is global warming, and how does it affect you?
Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels.
Finnish Final Workshop Helsinki 16th March 2016
Tools for Infrastructure System Resilience Evaluation
Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Shale gas impacts on groundwater resources
5th Follow up Committee Meeting HIVA-KUL, 6th October 2009
Creating a common understanding on Adverse events information requirements I. Bejar Alonso.
A probabilistic modelling approach to assessing the risks to groundwater contamination from hydraulic fracturing for a UK shale gas industry Olivia Milton-Thompson.
Fossil Fuels.
Fossil Fuels.
Evaluating Non-Leak Threats
Oil or Gas??? Should there be a difference in seismic response (AVO) between an oil-filled reservoir and a gas-filled reservoir? Model response with different.
Employer Needs Terri Bowers June 27, 2013.
Institute for Energy Economics and Rational use of Energy 
Environmental Aspects & Impacts
A. Mancusoa,b, M. Compareb, A. Saloa, E. Ziob,c
ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCE OF POTENTIAL MAJOR ACCIDENTS
Produced Water – A Resource
Forest Planning Under the 2012 Planning Rule
WG ESA meeting 9th of March 2015
IPLOCA SAFETY WORKSHOP GENEVA, SWITZERLAND July 1st 2015
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
Developing a shelter strategy
GeoERA - GROUNDWATER VoGERA - rationale Increased pressure on deep sub-surface in Europe for energy related activities e.g. oil and gas, geothermal, energy.
BHOPAL Industrial Disaster Management Cycle: OECD 2004.
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
AMRA’s contribution to WP4
Chapter PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
And now the Framework WP4.
Unit 3: Natural Resources
SWOT and PESTEL Analysis By MyAssignmenthelp.com MyAssignmenthelp.com.
Contingency Planning for Accidental Surface Water Pollution​ GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-705) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets specific requirements to be.
Presentation transcript:

Workplan for the development of multi-risk analysis (WP7) A. Garcia-Aristizabal

Objective “to develop a quantitative framework for multi-hazard and multi-risk analyses to assess risks associated with gas shale exploration and exploitation activities”

Objectives (specific) To implement an effective mechanism to identify and structure scenarios of risk interactions and cascading effects, taking into account the phase of development of the project: Drilling Hydraulic stimulation Production Abandonment To develop and implement physically-based, probabilistic tools for the assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of interrelated risk scenarios considering: Induced seismicity Ground water pollution Air pollution NaTech-like accidents

Objectives (specific) To implement the developed framework in one of the study case. To perform a comparative analysis between the impacts of shale gas operations and the impacts related to exploitation of alternative energy sources.

WP7 structure Task 7.1 Identification and structuring multi-risk scenarios (AMRA, KeU, KNMI) Task 7.2 Development of a probabilistic framework for the assessment of impacts associated with shale gas operations adopting a multi-risk perspective (AMRA, KNMI) Task 7.3 Comparative analysis of the impacts of shale gas operations with the impacts associated to conventional gas and oil sources (KNMI, AMRA, KeU)

Workplan for the development of multi-risk analysis

Framing the problem

Framing the problem

Framing the problem

Framing the problem

Primary risk receptors considered

Primary risk receivers considered

Primary risk receivers Above surface Below surface

Framing the problem Risk receptors Atmosphere Local communities Underground water Surface water ... Major hazard Multi-risk OUTCOMES Spills, Leaks Structural damages Blowout ... paths sources

Multi-risk analysis Main characteristics: Scenario identification and structuring using event trees, fault trees and bow-tie analysis (for different phases). An approach based on key physical phenomena contributing to risk (precursor based?) Use of (simplified) Integrated Assessment Models Quantitative assessment based on Bayesian data analysis.

1. Scenario identification Scenario identification and structuring using event trees, fault trees and bow-tie analysis.

2. Integrated assessment models Use of (simplified) Integrated Assessment Models

Integrated assessment models

Bayesian approach Hierarchical Bayesian approach

Bayesian approach Hierarchical Bayesian approach

Bayesian approach Hierarchical Bayesian approach