Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Advertisements

Pure Bending.
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Dynamic Deformation and Recovery Response of Red Blood Cells to a Cyclically Reversing Shear Flow: Effects of Frequency of Cyclically Reversing Shear.
Actin Protofilament Orientation at the Erythrocyte Membrane
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Stresses, Strains and Deflections of Steel Beams in Pure Bending
James Butler, Narla Mohandas, Richard E. Waugh  Biophysical Journal 
4 Pure Bending.
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Characterizing Cell Adhesion by Using Micropipette Aspiration
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Guillaume T. Charras, Mike A. Horton  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Torsional Behavior of Axonal Microtubule Bundles
Behavior of Giant Vesicles with Anchored DNA Molecules
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Morphology of the Lamellipodium and Organization of Actin Filaments at the Leading Edge of Crawling Cells  Erdinç Atilgan, Denis Wirtz, Sean X. Sun  Biophysical.
Calculation of a Gap Restoration in the Membrane Skeleton of the Red Blood Cell: Possible Role for Myosin II in Local Repair  C. Cibert, G. Prulière,
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Platelet Adhesive Dynamics
Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Probing Red Blood Cell Morphology Using High-Frequency Photoacoustics
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Arpita Upadhyaya, Michael P. Sheetz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
S. Majid Hosseini, James J. Feng  Biophysical Journal 
Viscoelasticity as a Biomarker for High-Throughput Flow Cytometry
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Amir H.G. Isfahani, Jonathan B. Freund  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Lipeng Lai, Xiaofeng Xu, Chwee Teck Lim, Jianshu Cao 
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Energetics of Inclusion-Induced Bilayer Deformations
4 Pure Bending.
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Delphine Icard-Arcizet, Olivier Cardoso, Alain Richert, Sylvie Hénon 
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Drug-Induced Changes of Cytoskeletal Structure and Mechanics in Fibroblasts: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study  Christian Rotsch, Manfred Radmacher  Biophysical.
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Bekele Gurmessa, Shea Ricketts, Rae M. Robertson-Anderson 
Energetics of Inclusion-Induced Bilayer Deformations
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Brian P. Helmke, Amy B. Rosen, Peter F. Davies  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 43-56 (July 2001) Direct Measurement of the Area Expansion and Shear Moduli of the Human Red Blood Cell Membrane Skeleton  Guillaume Lenormand, Sylvie Hénon, Alain Richert, Jacqueline Siméon, François Gallet  Biophysical Journal  Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 43-56 (July 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0 Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Scheme of the stainless steel flow chamber, placed on the stage of the microscope. The RBCs are trapped in the narrow channel (e ∼60μm) limited by the cylindrical lens and the coverslip. The immersion objective is used both for the observation and the optical tweezers focusing. Several holes allow local injection of buffers, detergent solution, and RBC suspension through small polyethylene catheters (not shown). Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Principle of the experimental procedure (not to scale). An RBC is seized by trapping each of the three silica beads bound to its periphery in optical tweezers. A detergent solution is injected to dissolve the lipid bilayer. The beads remain stuck to the skeleton. The skeleton is deformed by varying the distances between the traps. Its deformation, interpolated from the beads positions, is a superposition of shear and area expansion. The forces exerted on the beads are calculated with calibration formula 1. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Construction used to separate the triplet of forces (F)=(FA, FB, FC) into two triplets of forces (Fe)=(FeA, FeB, FeC) and (Fs)=(FsA, FsB, FsC), respectively, generating a pure area expansion and a pure shear stress. FA=FAB+FAC is projected along the two directions normal to AB and AC. Equivalent projections are drawn in B and C. The triplets (Fe) and (Fs) are explained in the text. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The number of sheets of the skeleton that are deformed depends on the position of the beads. (A) If the beads are in a plane of symmetry for the skeleton, the upper and lower sheets of the skeleton are deformed. (B) If the beads are not in a plane of symmetry, only one sheet is deformed. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Two images of a skeleton visualized by labeling F-actin with phalloidin-TRITC, taken during the first set of deformations in an isotonic buffer. In (A) a low stress is applied to the skeleton, and (B) shows the same skeleton at higher stress. The skeleton roughly keeps a triangular shape, meaning that the approximation of homogeneous strain is reasonable. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Stress versus strain plotted for a typical deformation of a freshly extracted skeleton in low osmolarity buffer (25 mOsm/kg). (A) Pure area expansion component σe versus area dilation ΔS/S; (B) pure shear component σs versus shear strain uXX−uYY. Notice the linear behavior in both cases, in agreement with linear elasticity model. The respective slopes give the area expansion modulus KC and the shear modulus μC. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Stack histograms of the elastic moduli KC (A) and μC (B) obtained for each deformation (77 measurements for KC and 76 for μC on 19 different skeletons) right after extraction in low osmolarity buffer. The histograms present two maxima: the first one corresponds to the deformation of a single sheet of the skeleton and the second one of both sheets. The values of the two maxima are in a 2:1 ratio. The best fit with a double Gaussian is also represented. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Stack histogram of the ratio KC/μC, KC, and μC being measured from the same deformation of a skeleton, right after extraction in low osmolarity buffer. The best Gaussian fit is shown. The center value is 〈KC/μC〉=1.9±1.0. This value is close to the predictions of theoretical and numerical studies for a two-dimensional triangular network of identical springs. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Stack histograms of the elastic moduli KC (A) and μC (B) obtained for each deformation (44 measurements for KC and 35 for μC on seven different skeletons) right after extraction in isotonic buffer. Contrary to the measurements in low osmolarity buffer, there is no clear evidence for two maxima. In this case the two sheets of the skeleton may be stuck together, because the high ionic strength of the medium screens the repulsive interaction between the spectrin filaments. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Stack histogram of the ratio KC/μC, KC, and μC being measured from the same deformation of a skeleton, right after extraction in isotonic buffer. The average value is 〈KC/μC〉=3.0±1.3. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 (A) Configuration of three forces GA, GB, and GC generating a pure expansion stress on the triangle ABC. They are oriented along the normals to the segments BC, CA, and AB, and their sum GA+GB+GC is zero. (B) The three forces FeA, FeB, and FeC applied at the vertices A, B, and C exert a pure expansion stress equivalent to the one generated by GA, GB, and GC. They are supported by the triangle heights and their amplitude is given by equations A5–A7. Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 (A) Configuration of three forces KA, KB, and KC generating a pure shear stress on the triangle ABC. Their sum KA+KB+KC is zero. They are oriented in such a way that the angles (nA, eX) and (eX, KA) are equal (and equivalent relations by permutation). (B) The three forces FsA, FsB, and FsC applied at the vertices A, B, and C exert a pure shear stress equivalent to the one generated by KA, KB, and KC. They intersect at a single point located on the circle passing through the points A, B, and C, and their amplitude is given by equations A10–A12. They are the result of the superposition of three torques (FsAB, FsBA=−FsAB), (FsAC, FsCA=−FsAC), and (FsBC, FsCB=−FsBC). Biophysical Journal 2001 81, 43-56DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75678-0) Copyright © 2001 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions