Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Dynamics and Mechanics of Endothelial Cell Spreading Cynthia A. Reinhart-King, Micah Dembo, Daniel A. Hammer Biophysical Journal Volume 89, Issue 1,
Advertisements

A Hydrodynamic Model for Hindered Diffusion of Proteins and Micelles in Hydrogels Ronald J. Phillips Biophysical Journal Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages
Spatiotemporal Image Correlation Spectroscopy (STICS) Theory, Verification, and Application to Protein Velocity Mapping in Living CHO Cells Benedict Hebert,
Mesoscale Simulation of Blood Flow in Small Vessels Prosenjit Bagchi Biophysical Journal Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007) DOI: /biophysj
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Janosch Lichtenberger, Peter Fromherz  Biophysical Journal 
Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanical Properties of Actin Stress Fibers in Living Cells
Spontaneous Synchronization of Coupled Circadian Oscillators
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Electrostatic Properties of Protein-Protein Complexes
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Influence of Chain Length and Unsaturation on Sphingomyelin Bilayers
Volume 91, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Hierarchical Modeling of the Elastic Properties of Bone at Submicron Scales: The Role of Extrafibrillar Mineralization  Svetoslav Nikolov, Dierk Raabe 
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Propagation of Mechanical Stress through the Actin Cytoskeleton toward Focal Adhesions: Model and Experiment  Raja Paul, Patrick Heil, Joachim P. Spatz,
Mesoscale Simulation of Blood Flow in Small Vessels
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Predicting the Rupture Probabilities of Molecular Bonds in Series
Electronic Transport in DNA
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
Daniela K. Schlüter, Ignacio Ramis-Conde, Mark A.J. Chaplain 
Arterial Extracellular Matrix: A Mechanobiological Study of the Contributions and Interactions of Elastin and Collagen  Ming-Jay Chow, Raphaël Turcotte,
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane Elasticity in Giant Vesicles with Fluid Phase Coexistence
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Ushio Takeda, Atsushi Utani, Jinghai Wu, Hiroshi Shinkai 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
A Mesoscale Model of DNA and Its Renaturation
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Dana N. Moses, Michael G. Pontin, J. Herbert Waite, Frank W. Zok 
Ave Minajeva, Michael Kulke, Julio M. Fernandez, Wolfgang A. Linke 
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Lipid Asymmetry in DLPC/DSPC-Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined AFM and Fluorescence Microscopy Study  Wan-Chen Lin, Craig D. Blanchette, Timothy V.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
R. Gueta, D. Barlam, R.Z. Shneck, I. Rousso  Biophysical Journal 
Janosch Lichtenberger, Peter Fromherz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
ECM Cross-Linking Regulates Invadopodia Dynamics
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Prisca Schär-Zammaretti, Job Ubbink  Biophysical Journal 
Bekele Gurmessa, Shea Ricketts, Rae M. Robertson-Anderson 
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
René B. Svensson, Tue Hassenkam, Colin A. Grant, S. Peter Magnusson 
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
The Layered Structure of Coronary Adventitia under Mechanical Load
Electrostatic Properties of Protein-Protein Complexes
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamic Role of Cross-Linking Proteins in Actin Rheology
Presentation transcript:

Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 1916-1929 (March 2008) Mechanical and Failure Properties of Extracellular Matrix Sheets as a Function of Structural Protein Composition  Lauren D. Black, Philip G. Allen, Shirley M. Morris, Phillip J. Stone, Béla Suki  Biophysical Journal  Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 1916-1929 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.107144 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Confocal image examples of autofluorescence taken from the bottom layer of each of the three ECM sheet types while still encased in gelatin. (B) The average thickness data for all three ECM sheet groups at 0% strain (left) and ∼20% strain (right). The asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to 0% strain (p<0.05). The pound sign denotes a significant difference between groups at a given strain (p<0.05). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Time course of the mean±SD of the stiffness parameter, H, and the damping parameter, G, for the control (solid shapes) and elastase-digested (open shapes) samples. Panels A–C display H-values for the EO, EC10, and EC6 groups, respectively. Panels D–F display G-values for the EO, EC10, and EC6 groups, respectively. The asterisk denotes a significant difference within group compared to the value at 0min (p<0.05). The pound sign denotes a significant difference between digested and control samples at a given time point (p<0.05). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Representative examples of the stress-strain curves for the three sample groups. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Time course of the mean±SD of the amplitude parameter A and the nonlinearity parameter b for the control (solid shapes) and elastase-digested (open shapes) samples. Panels A–C display A-values for the EO, EC10, and EC6 groups, respectively. Panels D–F display b-values for the EO, EC10, and EC6 groups, respectively. The asterisk denotes a significant difference within group compared to the value at 0min (p<0.05). The pound sign denotes a significant difference between digested and control samples at a given time point (p<0.05). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (A) The mean±SD values of the maximum stress during a failure test for control samples (left) and elastase-digested samples (right) for all three ECM sheet types. (B) The mean±SD of the failure strain for control samples (left) and elastase-digested samples (right) for all three ECM sheet types. The asterisk denotes a significant difference between elastase-digested and control values within a group (p<0.05). The pound sign denotes a significant difference between group values at a given treatment (p<0.05). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Electron microscopic images of EC6 sheets at 0% (A) and 30% (B) strain. Images were taken at 12,500×. Arrows denote collagen fibers and e denotes elastin. Scale bar represents 0.5μm. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Examples of (A) an organized network with stiffer springs comprising ∼14% of the network but organized into a single fiber, and (B) a network in which stiff springs make up 40% of the network but are randomly distributed. Both networks are strained to 40% strain. Note that darker shading represents higher force and lighter shading represents lower force. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Stress-strain curves from network model simulations of varying amounts of collagen content by randomly dispersing stiffer springs in a homogeneous network. Note that the solid line with square symbols represents a simulation of a network with 6:1 normal to stiff spring ratio in which the stiff springs have been organized into fibers that transverse the network. Stress is given in arbitrary units. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Correlation between failure stress and the stress-strain amplitude parameter, A, for all three groups at control conditions. Note that A is a reasonable predictor of failure stress as evidenced by the regression coefficient (r2=0.40). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 1916-1929DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.107144) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions