The main results of the Pesticides Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE 1 AGRICULTURAL PRICE STATISTICS Agriculture Statistics Division Agricultural Structure.
Advertisements

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia National Health Accounts Belgrade May 13, 2014 Group for Satellite Accounts.
Pesticide and Fertilizer Management in the Republic of Moldova Aurora Garabagiu - National Bureau of Statistics Iulia Iordachi - Ministry of Agriculture.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
Electronic reporting in Poland 27th Voorburg Group Meeting Warsaw, Poland October 1st to October 5th, 2012 Central Statistical Office of Poland.
State Plant Protection Service 26 September 2007 ISTAMBUL 2005 Transition Facility Programme PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA Danguolė Krepštulienė,
1 Environmental Information System in Hungary Agnes Martosné Bartha Aarhus Convention’s Task Force on Electronic Tools 2nd Meeting January 2004.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department Agricultural Structure.
Waste Water Related Environmental Reporting in Hungary – Ensuring consistency – Hungarian Central Statistical Office Environment Statistics Department.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department Agricultural Census Economic.
Rome, 2015 Alikhan Smailov Chairman of the Committee on Statistics Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Development of agricultural.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Overview of experiences in Slovenia and Hungary Riga, July 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation Programme.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 The project “Pesticide indicators” and the use of PPP’s in the context of the new Regulation on PPPs Riga, July 2007.
Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005 Lot 2: Pesticide Indicators Survey on Pesticide Use on Wheat Crops.
1 Overview of Economic Statistics in Africa UNECA Andry Andriantseheno Regional Workshop on Basic Economic Statistics Addis-Ababa October 2007.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Important aspects of data processing and presenting format Vilnius, 5-6 September 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation.
Istanbul 13-14th September, 2007 Marios A.Adamides Plant Health Inspection Service Dep. Of Agriculture Min. of Agriculture Cyprus Workshop on Pesticide.
„Improvement of statistical methods on the use of organic and inorganic fertilisers” GRANT project No Co-ordination meeting, Luxembourg,
Pesticide use survey in Lithuania 2007 PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA SURVEY CROP – WINTER WHEAT Danguolė Krepštulienė, Statistics Lithuania Darius.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic 1 Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Indicators Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Cooperation Programme.
The business process models and quality issues at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) Mr. Csaba Ábry, HCSO, Methodological Department Geneva,
2nd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Usage Survey on Wheat in Hungary Zsuzsanna Szabó Hungarian Central Statistical Office September.
1 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Central Bureau of Statistics Data collection project: PESTICIDE STATISTICS Istanbul, September Vesna Koletic, M.Sc.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
ROMANIA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS ROMANIA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS EFFICIENCY OF FERTILIZER APPLICATION TO MAIN CROPS Aneta GÂLCĂ Gabriela.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agriculture and Environmental Statistics Department Agricultural Statistics Group 1 IMPLEMENTATION.
How to deal with quality aspects in estimating national results Annalisa Pallotti Short Term Expert Asa 3st Joint Workshop on Pesticides Indicators Valletta.
The Development of Statistical Business Registers in Myanmar
Budapest, Hungary, 21 October, 2016 CESS 2016
TAIEX Workshop: Improving data collection and the Use of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) Communication in process of data collection and data.
Presentation of the Hungarian Grant Project
Pesticide data Sales data: Use data: Country use data:
Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005
OECD SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS WORKING PARTY (STESWP) MEETING
A GLANCE AT THE POLISH FADN
Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses
Introduction on Institutional Setting Istanbul, September 2007
Preparation for Census 2021
Goals and objectives of Work package 2 of the ESSnet on Consistency of concepts and applied methods of business and trade-related statistics Norbert Rainer,
Expert visit Bratislava, – Part 2
State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service
Recommendations on survey implementation
PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY IN TURKEY
2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS PREPARATORY WORKS
Central Business Register Central Statistics Office
Institutional arrangements of external trade statistics in Hungary
Outbound Tourism Statistics in Turkey
FINAL REPORT PLAN PILOT PROJECT: Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary
3rd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
Main lessons learnt from the censuses in Hungary
PHARE and TF Missions: main findings
2011 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS PREPARATORY WORKS
„Elektra” HCSO electronic survey and its background
Session 4 – From pilot to regular surveys: the costs aspects Introduction: cost impact of possible design strategies Malta, January 2008 Transition.
THE SAMPLING APPROACH IN SLOVENIA
ENCODING TOOL DEVELOPED BY HUNGARY Márta Záhonyi
Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
Lot 2: Agricultural and Environmental Statistics
2005 Transition Facility Programme
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary
ICON-Institute Public Sector
Cost impact of design strategies, the Slovenian example
Hanna Gembarzewska, Monika Grabani
Towards Census 2021 in Hungary
Key Considerations for Planning and Management of Census Operations
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
Country Report of the Statistical Center of Iran for Workshop on Integrated Economic Statistics and Informal Sector for ECO Member Countries November.
ICON-Institute Public Sector
« Survey on PRODCOM data collection in other MS
Presentation transcript:

The main results of the Pesticides Survey on Wheat in Hungary Hungarian Central Statistical Office Environment Statistics Section by Pál AUJESZKY 3rd Joint Workshop on Pesticides Indicators (Valletta, Malta 17-18 January 2008) www.ksh.hu

Background information 1/2. Projekt participants: Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) – coordination Agricultural Office Deputy Directorate Responsible for Authorization of Plant Protection Products/ Plant Protection Department – fieldwork Expert from Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD)

Background information 2/2. Sales data are collected on annual basis by the Research Institute for Agricultural Economics Statistical data collection on pesticides use not carried out except for the pilot project in 2005 Information on area treated with pesticide by main crops are included in FSS 2007 Number of farms in Hungary 8000 agricultural enterprises 707 000 private farmers Average farm size (agricultural area) 380 hectares – enterprises 3 hectares – private holdings

Type of the survey TF2005 Representative survey on pesticide use concerning winter wheat Carried out on voluntary basis Reference period 2005-2006 (crop season) The sample frame of the survey based on Farm Register derives from Agricultural Census 2000. The register is actualized according to interval agricultural surveys (FSS 2003, 2005) Sample frame included 2 858 agricultural enterprises and 9 546 private holdings with wheat production Three size classes for 20 counties (NUTS 3) Stratification criteria is the harvested area of wheat < 5ha 5-100ha >100ha

Selected farms for the survey

Electronic data collection All questionnaires are filled out in electronic way Personal interview (Info Path 2003) Holdings <100 hectares are visited by inspectors Number of farms: 520 Response rate: ~99% Field interviews were performed by 25 PPP inspectors in August 2007. They recorded data on their laptops By downloadable questionnaire In order to reduce the cost of the survey questionnaires were collected from the bigger holdings per Windows Server (hosting) Number of farms: 260 Response rate: ~50% Data collection was performed in August-September 2007.

Problems encountered during the data evaluation Some pesticides were missing from „pull down” pesticide list of the questionnaire, and „other” category was not given Not take into account that case, when farmer did not use pesticides at all. In this case inspectors had to select a pesticide and make a note about this at the end of the questionnaire: (1-2% of questionnaires) Many times inspectors had to use the substitute list of farms because the original farm list was not up-to date (e.g. included farms not interested in wheat production, address was not suitable) The database is made by MS-Access to avoid the mystery of IT or/and the subordination to IT (e.g. Oracle)

The Access database behind the Survey 1/2.

Connections of the tables of the Access database, queries

Problems to be solved Further evaluation and validation of survey data Imputation Elaboration of the meta data informations Grossing-up to the national level Calculation of indicators Compilation of the Final Report Not take into account that case, when farmer did not use pesticides at all. In this case inspectors had to select a pesticide and make a note about this at the end of the questionnaire: (1-2% of questionnaires) Many times inspectors had to use the substitute list of farms because the original farm list was not up-to date (e.g. included farms not interested in wheat production, address was not suitable) We organised the data in a MS Access database to avoid the informatical mistifications (Oracle etc.)

Thank you for your Attention!