Using Student Survey Data to Build Campus Collaborations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

Integrating Library Resources into the Course Development Process at an Online College ©2009 The Sheridan Libraries of The Johns Hopkins University Inspiration,
Mellon Library/Faculty Fellowship for Undergraduate Research Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California, Berkeley
Mellon Fellowship for Undergraduate Research: Ideas, Innovations & Impacts Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California,
Embedded Librarians: Collaborations in Research and Teaching Julie K. Gaines, MLIS; Kim Mears, MLIS; Lindsay Blake, MLIS, AHIP; Kathy Davies, MLS; Peter.
Blazing Trails: On the Path to Information Literacy: lighting the path to collections through collaboration Brena Smith and Alison Armstrong, UCLA Library.
Managing Globally for Acting Locally Organizational Support for Liaison Librarians Tracy Gabridge, MIT Libraries.
Margaret Martin Gardiner Assessment Librarian The University of Western Ontario LibQUAL+2007 Canada 25 October 2007.
Ann Campion Riley University of Missouri
Literacy instruction: Connecting to online faculty and students Dr. Marilyn Harhai, Department of Library Science Mary Buchanan, University Libraries Clarion.
Bepress Session – ALA Midwinter, Philadelphia Supporting Undergraduate Success; Institutional Repositories as curricular tools Teresa A. Fishel January.
PATIENCE IS KEY: INTEGRATING ORIENTATION, TRANSITION & RETENTION Brett Bruner, Director of First Year Experience/Persistence & Retention Fort Hays State.
Scholarly Communication Services: Repository-based Library Publishing OLA Preconference Feb. 2, 2011 Adrian K. Ho The University of Western Ontario.
Librarians Building Relationships. Introductions Terry Madden Barbara Glackin Rick Stoddart Amy Vecchione.
Beyond the Basics—Casting a Net to Provide Customized Research Services for Faculty & Students ACRL Friday, March 13, :00-9:00 AM.
Academic Advising College of Arts and sciences and the general college
Heidi Manning, Susan Larson and Bethany Leraas
Liya Deng Social Sciences Librarian Eastern Washington University
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
Ghazala Hashmi, PhD Coordinator Center for Faculty Engagement
Marketing Strategies for the Use of Research4Life Resources
How to Talk about Accreditation with Students and Employers
Exploring CSU and the WHY
Getting Started: Beginning the Assessment Cycle in a New STEM Class
University Career Services Committee
WOREP: What we learned at CSUF?
Faculty Development: Preparing Clinical Nursing Instructors
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
Unlikely Interns: Students with Disabilities Services and Interns
SUSTAINING A COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATION IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
Nonprofit Capacity Building
As Good As It Gets…For Now:
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
CONUL Teaching and Learning Sub Committee
City of Durham Strategic Planning
Mary Moser Learning Commons Librarian
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel July 16, 2013
Research Development Office
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Initial Outreach to Local Libraries (a primer)
MDI MOVING TO ACTION with MDI Results
MOVING TO ACTION With MDI Results KEY MESSAGE:
Action Plans Your teaching – individual
Marketing Strategies for the Use of Research4Life Resources
Sit by institution or program size Self-define small, medium, or large
Designed for internal training use:
Student Success Tell Your Story: Communication Skills for the Artist
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Topics Introduction to Research Development
Your Library: Explore, Learn, Read, Connect
Library + LLC A Partnership Story.
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation
Adelia Grabowsky and Juliet Rumble Auburn University Libraries
Where Do We Grow from Here?
The Heart of Student Success
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
Knowing Our Users Deriving Value from the Ithaka S+R Local Surveys at the University of Missouri Jeannette E. Pierce Associate University Librarian for.
The Florida State University College of Education
From The Outside Looking In To The Inside Looking Out
Lecturette 2: Planning Change
Management of Embedded Librarianship in Academic Institutions
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
CLASS REPRESENTATIVES
Assessing the Needs in Your District
Building Liaison Relationships: Some Practical Ideas
Presentation transcript:

Using Student Survey Data to Build Campus Collaborations Elizabeth Edwards Assessment Librarian Rebecca Starkey Librarian for College Instruction & Outreach December 5, 2018

About Us Rebecca Starkey Librarian for College Instruction & Outreach Focus on undergraduate research, teaching, and learning Library liaison for The College Chair of the Library’s Instruction & Outreach Steering Committee

About Us Elizabeth Edwards Assessment Librarian Broadly responsible for assessment, including the Library’s survey program Home with a new baby instead of here in Houston

UChicago Library’s Survey Program Different Approaches to Using Survey Data The Library has embarked upon a survey program for over 10 years, progressing through different instruments:

Library Survey Program 2004 & 2007 LibQUAL+ Three dimensions of service quality Students Faculty Staff 2010-2013 Locally-Developed Library-specific feedback on collections & services Graduate students (2010) Undergraduates (2011) Faculty (2013) 2015 & 2017 Ithaka S+R Student experiences, needs & perceptions Graduate students (2015) Undergraduates (2017) LibQUAL + Custom, locally developed survey which gathered very specific feedback on issues relevant to the Library at the time. For example, the Faculty survey in 2013 focused only on ebooks. We moved to using the Ithaka S+R survey, first with graduate students and then undergraduates in 2017

Use of Library Survey Data Staff survey teams were directed to describe broad themes, rather than identify areas for action. Library administration conducted their own analysis. Survey reports were developed for the whole library but minimally used outside of administration. This approach did not work for the Ithaka S+R Graduate Student Survey given its focus on students rather than the Library.  After the completion of each survey, teams analyzed the data (including comments and created a large survey report, focusing on very broad themes. Library Administration reviewed the findings and conducted their own analysis. Survey reports were shared with staff, there was little use of the data outside of administration.   However, the Ithaka student survey challenged this process. Previous surveys offered actionable findings that related directly to the Library. By their nature, the Ithaka surveys take a much broader perspective.

Analyzing and Reporting on Ithaka S+R Survey Findings A New Approach Analyzing and Reporting on Ithaka S+R Survey Findings

A Broader Picture Exploring Issues Through Survey Data Provided insight on student life and academics beyond the Library Highlighted areas of concern that cannot be solved by the Library alone Identified future needs which the Library could potentially support Talking About Students—Not Ourselves How do we tell a story with our data that resonates with potential partners? The Ithaka student surveys provided insight on student life and academics beyond the library. Issues that were highlighted in the survey could not be resolved by the Library alone, but only through partnerships. It was essential to find a way to use the data to tell stories that would relate to potential partners.  

Taking a Thematic Approach Key Themes Research skills & opportunities Impact of library instruction Use of physical spaces Strategic Communication Short thematic reports Brief presentations to staff Graphs & talking points Staggered release of data Rather than developing a large report for the administration, we decided to focus on identifying key themes in the data. These were Research skills and opportunities Impact of Library instruction Use of our physical spaces. Elizabeth Edwards, with the help of our survey team, created short reports around these themes. Graphs and talking points were created for use within the Library. The findings were also reported at all staff meetings in stages, preventing information overload and modeling how the survey data could be shared with campus partners.  

Building Campus Partnerships Using Survey Data to Develop Connections and Services We began reaching out to campus partners with a key affinity with the Library.

Library Student Advisory Group Survey themes Use of physical spaces Research skills and opportunities Impact of library instruction Outcomes Feedback on all night study space Need for more library assignments Not interested in impact of instruction! We started with the Library Student Advisory Group, sharing data we felt would be of greatest interest based on our interactions with the students. Elizabeth had attended the Library Student Advisory group meetings before the survey was analyzed, and they specifically asked to analyze data by residence halls. We also focused on instruction, which was of great interest to our graduate student members, many whom teach. There were great conversations about the need for more research assignments for students. The undergraduates were less interested in the impact of instruction, but provided very helpful information about the need for all night study and how their use of the library compared to survey respondents.

Chicago Center for Teaching Survey themes Development of research skills Comparisons with responses from graduate instructors regarding research skills Impact of library instruction Outcomes Deepened relationship with the Center Highlighted importance of research assignments Quarterly “Teaching Talks” The Chicago Center for Teaching was also identified as a key partner. With this group, we felt the data on the development of research skills was of most importance. We drew from our previous Ithaka S+R survey of graduate students who teach, highlighting data about who is responsible for teaching research skills on campus. Helpful converstations deepened our relationship with the Center, highlighted the importance of library collaboration on instruction, assignment design, and led to a series of ‘teaching talks” with offices that support instruction on campus.

College Center for Research & Fellowships (CCRF) Survey themes Research skills and opportunities Impact of instruction Outcomes Demonstrated data-informed understanding of the need for student research opportunities New partnership focused on fostering undergraduate research programs and opportunities What has resulted is a meaningful new partnership with the CCRF. The Library is now part of the Center’s programming. For example, we presented on Library services at the information session for Fulbright applicants, and produced a new library guide with resources. We are also supporting the CCRF’s Summer Research Institute, which is a new program focusing on humanities and social science research. We are also collaborating and hosting on a week of programming on undergraduate research including poster sessions, training programs and more.

A New Partnership Library support for Fulbright applicants CCRF staff office hours in the Library Support for new CCRF Summer Research Institute in the Humanities and Social Sciences Library hosting the 2019 Undergraduate Research Week programs Finally, our most successful use of the survey data was with the Center for Research and Fellowships, a College office that focused on providing undergraduates research opportunities. We used the Ithaka survey data on research opportunities and impact of library instruction on research skills. Using the survey findings with this office were fruitful, because it demonstrated a data-informed understanding of the need for student research opportunities. Our survey findings matched those of assessments conducted by the CCRF. The CCRF understood that many of our students lacked many of the experiences and research skills to succeed in their research programs. Our conversations convinced the CCRF that the Library was a key partner in helping students develop these skills.

Starting Conversations About UChicago Students Outreach to Faculty Starting Conversations About UChicago Students In terms of faculty, we took a somewhat different approach, connecting our findings on students with their work.

Faculty Newsletter Fall 2019 Highlighting findings from Ithaka S+R Surveys demonstrating the impact of Library instruction Promoting the Library’s instruction and assignment design services We used the survey data in an article for our faculty newsletter. We shared our findings on the impact of library instruction, highlighting our instruction and assignment design services.  

Sharing What We Learned Survey data is available for specific majors, departments or divisions (if data can be anonymized) Social Work Librarian used graduate survey data to plan his outreach to the School of Social Administration Additional reports and talking points for specific divisions or departments are being developed for Library liaisons We also offer our subject librarians the survey data for use in their work, breaking down findings by undergraduate division and major where possible. Our social work librarian used the data in detail for his outreach with his students and faculty. Additional talking points and graphs are being created for Library liaisons for meetings with faculty.  

Outreach to University Administration Changing Perspectives About Our Role Finally, we have been presenting our findings to University administrators.   These efforts have been mixed. We set a meeting with the Dean of Students in the College

Different Responses Office of the Deans of Students Brought survey findings to highlight common areas of interest and concern Emphasized the Library’s role supporting teaching and research Response Deans had different priorities: study space Did not envision the Library’s role outside of facilities Office of Institutional Analysis Introduced survey instrument in the context of campus survey efforts Emphasized the Library's interest in sharing and making use of data Response Enthusiasm about future data- informed collaborations We set a meeting with the Dean of Students in the College, which oversees student advising, research, and undergraduate support services, highlighting issues that we hoped would resonate with them, and reaffirm the Library’s role in supporting student academics. But this message did not connect with the Deans. While polite, they only asked for more information about study spaces, which we did not bring. While we should have been more proactive in asking what data was important to them, it was disappointing that after hearing our findings, they continued to see the Library primarily as collections and spaces.   Elizabeth had a much more promising recent meeting with the Office of Institutional Analysis. Sharing our Ithaka findings, Elizabeth placed our survey efforts in the broader context of campus survey efforts, and emphasized our interest in sharing our findings. The director had many questions and was interested in providing Library access to the data collected by the Office to conduct additional analysis about specific themes. This again is a growing collaboration.

Future Use of Ithaka Survey Data Development of our new Center for Digital Scholarship Infographics to share with donors or alumni Handouts or giveaways using survey data to promote Library services As we move forward, we continue to use the Ithaka survey data to identify new ways to support our users and develop partnerships, most specifically for our planning for a new Center for Digital scholarship. However, we are also looking to use the data in new creative ways for outreach, by creating interesting infographic for publications or handouts.

Thank You! Slides: uchicago.box.com/v/EdwardsStarkeyLAC2018 Contact Us: Elizabeth Edwards eee@uchicago.edu Rebecca Starkey rstarkey@uchicago.edu