Performance Recovery at CEBAF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning and Operation of the Horizontal Test Apparatus at SNS Presented at: CEC/ICMC.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 (ECFA-CLIC-ILC Joint Meeting) Denis Kostin, MHF-SL,
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
JLAB waveguide couplers R. Rimmer for JLab SRF Institute.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
Experience with LEP (and LHC) cryo-modules Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL O.Brunner – November ’09.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
Reliability of SNS Superconducting Linac April 12, 2011 Jeff Saunders SNS/ORNL.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization. Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV.
1 new module Seven cell Cavity, 0.7 m long (high Q L ) 8 Cavities per Cryomodule Fits the existing Cryomodule footprint.
EXAMPLE OF REDUCED CRYOMODULE HEAT CAPACITY DUE TO HELIUM PRESSURE RETURN LEVELS 0L04 CASE HISTORY.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
Evolution of Field Emission Characteristics Selected C100 Cryomodules Michael Drury.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
C75 Cryomodule Planning E. Daly/T. Reilly 21 January 2016.
Science and Technology Briefing Sept
SRF Operating Experience at JLab
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Field Emission Minimization for LCLS-II
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
Electropolishing of Dressed ILC 9-cell Cavity
Degradation and Recovery of Cavity Performance
FRIB Cryogenic Support
CEBAF Accelerator Status
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
SNS Operational History
DC Injector and Space Charge Simulation Status
R&D Activity for Field Emission and Vertical EP
Operational Experience - Field Emission
Jiyuan Zhai ( IHEP ) TTC Meeting, JLAB, 6 Nov 2012
SNS Fundamental Power Coupler History
Regular cryomodule maintenance plans (radiation damage, seals, etc)
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
KEK injector cryomodule
C75 Risk Assessment Geoff Krafft
Operations Department
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
Performance Degradation cERL Injector Cryomodule
Operations Department
Thoughts on Energy Reach
Cryomodule design modifications for C75
C75 Commissioning Michael Drury SRF Operations Support
Strategy for operation and recovery of performance at SNS -Background -History of performance -What is our operational strategy -Performance recovery.
Outline: Recent CEBAF performance JLAB-TN-022 Energy Reach Plan
Ken Baggett JLab Staytreat, 2017
Cryomodule Test Schedule
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Field Emission Onset for C50 Cryomodules in the CMTF
Field Emission and Mitigation in the CEBAF Linacs R Legg, R Geng Jlab SRF Ops Dept. TTC,
JLab Users Organization Annual Meeting June 24, 2019
C100 Operation Enhancing gradient reach for the
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
QCM and C50-12 Status Update
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

Performance Recovery at CEBAF Michael Drury SRF Operations Support Jefferson Lab

Outline CEBAF Description Helium Processing Cryomodule Refurbishment

Background CEBAF Accelerator First large high-power CW recirculating e-linac based on SRF technology In operation since 1995 5 C100 cryomodules 20 C20 / C50 cryomodules 30 cryomodules per linac 2 ¼ cryomodules in the injector 25 ¼ C20 cryomodules (5 cell cavities) 20+ years 12 C50 cryomodules (refurbished C20’s) 1 – 10 years 11 C100 cryomodules (7 cell cavities) 4 – 5 years Some of the oldest cryomodules have been in tunnel for ~25 years. Maintaining performance is constant battle ~ 5 FTE’s / year

Helium Processing Note relatively low cost – 4 FTE’s plus ~$50K Proven technique for reducing field emission There have been three mass He processing runs at JLAB 1st in late 90’s Gauge utility of HeP for reducing arc rates 2nd after Hurricane Isabel Uncontrolled warm up – increased field emission 3rd summer of 2015 (314 cavities processed over 3 months) Increase energy reach for 12 GeV program Going forward, we intend to process a few likely candidates every summer Several rounds of mass processing over the years for performance recovery Inject 99.9999% pure Helium into the cryomodule beamline Partial pressure ~5E-05 torr Apply RF to process Operate Cavity at highest reasonable gradient Cryocycle the module to remove helium Cavity temperatures to ~30 K Before and after characterization with GM tube array Note relatively low cost – 4 FTE’s plus ~$50K

Helium Processing - Benefits Arc Rate Reduction Original C20 FPC Design suffers from periodic arcing in vacuum space between RF windows. Usable gradient reduction of 20 – 30% to minimize trip rates C50 and C100 designs corrects this problem For C50 and especially C100 style cryomodules: Increased dynamic heat load becomes an issue Heat loads increase exponentially In C100’s heat loads can reach higher than piping design limits Pressure increase -> Temperature approaches lambda Cavity can quench at lower gradients than expected May drive vacuum degradation Can cause hardware failures and material deterioration over time

Helium Processing - Results Spring 2015- Estimated Energy Reach ~2.05 GeV / single pass Needed energy reach of 2200 GeV / single pass Mass Helium Processing most CEBAF cryomodules during summer 2015 Total of 314 cavities ~201 MeV / pass gained by fall of 2015 enabling needed energy reach Raised Field emission onset gradients by 0.9 MV/m on average Lowered max dose rates by 2- 4 R/hr depending on measurement location

Cryomodule Refurbishment C50 Refurbishment Program includes reprocessing of SRF cavities Attempts to eliminate field emission increase the nominal gradient from 5 MV/m to 12.5 MV/m. New “dogleg” couplers between the cavity and helium vessel flanges eliminate cold window charging and periodic arcing Modification of the Qext of the FPC will allow higher gradient operations. new ceramic warm RF windows improvements to the mechanical tuners. Any damaged or worn components replaced. More recently, the program includes Investigations into improvement of magnetic hygiene And particulate hygiene Currently 13 C50 cryomodules installed with a goal of one per year Increase in operating voltage 15 - 25 MV / module Note Costs: ~0.5 – 1 M $ plus labor

Summary Addressed to major techniques for recovering gradient in CEBAF cryomodules Helium Processing is a tool that has been used on several occasions during CEBAF history to recover gradient performance and has some other beneficial side effects. Most recent attempt netted 201 MeV per pass in the linacs. Another processing run being contemplated for this coming summer using a more targeted method Most recent attempt netted 201 MeV per pass in the linacs Cryomodule refurbishment has been used to improve the design of existing cryomodules along with reprocessing of cavities. Gains of 15 - 25 MV per refurbished cryomodule