Homeless Initiatives MaineHousing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
…by your side. …working collaboratively. …to add value.
Update on Continuum of Care and HMIS Presented by: Ann Oliva Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs U.S. Department of Housing and Urban.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
Jack Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development Seattle Regional Office U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development WSCH Annual.
Department of Community Affairs. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM  “…maintains support for a crisis response system through emergency shelters, but.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
2015 Point In Time Count: Broward County CoC Plan to End Homelessness
2013 Point-in-Time Homeless Count Data Entry Volunteers.
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) How to Apply – Technical Assistance Sessions March 18 & 19, 2010.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Karen DeBlasio, HUD March 13, 2012 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
Continuum of Care (CoC)  Promotes community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness.  Provides funding for efforts by nonprofit providers.
Risk Analysis So how do we choose who gets monitored?  HQ gives each Field Office a monitoring goal they must meet.  Each year HUD reviews all of its.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data HMIS Beyond Data Collection Updated 9/14.
Establishing and Operating a Centralized /Coordinated Assessment System April 3, 2014 Michelle Sandoz-Dennis Continuum of Care Unit Director.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Emergency Solutions Grants Program February 2012.
Establishing and Operating a Centralized /Coordinated Assessment System April 3, 2014 Michelle Sandoz-Dennis Continuum of Care Unit Director.
Texas Department of Public Safety Public Assistance Disaster Closeout.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
2016 Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program Information Meeting October 20, 2015.
Ann Oliva, Director Brett Gagnon, Program Specialist Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs HEARTH Act: Continuum of Care Program.
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
2014 HMIS Data Standards Overview HMIS Data Standards Background – Key resources – Implementation Timeline – Revision Process Overview of Key.
Eligible Costs – Rental Assistance & Rapid Re-housing (RRH) 24 CFR CFR
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
Technical Assistance Session for Fiscal Year May 23 and 24, 2016.
WHY MONITOR? Compliance with applicable Federal requirements & performance goals are being achieved. Prevention of fraud & waste Early detection of inefficiencies.
Recordkeeping Requirements
Mountainland Continuum of Care
Eligible Costs – Leasing 24 CFR Program Components Leasing is an eligible cost under the following CoC program components: – Permanent supportive.
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Status: Approved by Eastern PA CoC Governing Board on October 19, 2015
HUD Policy Update: HUDS Special Needs Programs
Perkins Monitoring Update
Virginia Balance of State
Intent to Apply/Pre-Application Guidance
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
2017 Point in time & HIC.
WELCOME! & Introductions
Why do I need to know about Title VI?
2018 Point in time & HIC.
Homeless documentation
2018 Point in time (PIT) & Housing Inventory Count (HIC)
Norm Suchar, Director Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
September 15, 2008 Resource Coordinator Training
FY19/FY20 Detroit Collective Impact Funding
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
CoC Subrecipient Management
Managing Federal grants
Housing Prioritization
Virginia Balance of State
Supportive Housing Update 2019
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
COORDINATED ENTRY UPDATE
CDBG Public Service Agency Funding Process
Monitoring and Technical Assistance.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Housing Navigators and Resident Service Coordinators:
Presentation transcript:

Homeless Initiatives MaineHousing ESG Monitoring 101 Homeless Initiatives MaineHousing

Who are we monitoring: MaineHousing is required as the ESG Grantee to monitor all shelters that utilize Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Funding administered through the Emergency Shelter and Housing Assistance Program (ESHAP). This includes all ESHAP subrecipients and each individual project being funded with ESHAP funds. ESHAP funding is made up of State HOME funds, State general funds, and most important, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Federal funds. In total, MaineHousing is monitoring 38 emergency shelter projects located as far south as Sanford in York County up to Fort Kent in Aroostook County.

What we are monitoring: Three areas of compliance: 1. ESG and ESHAP Compliance. 2. ESHAP Financial Compliance (operations expenses, stabilization expenses). Physical inspections complying with HUD HQS (Housing Quality Standards)*. *Note these inspections are being conducted by the Asset Management Dept. at MaineHousing.

Where we are monitoring: Half of monitoring efforts will consist of a desk audit: In office, we will examine for compliance with ESG/ESHAP funds and the Maine Homeless Solutions Rule: Policies Financial Control Previous monitoring findings Performance We may request more documentation if necessary before, during and after the monitoring visit. In subsequent years, monitoring activities will look different. We will not need to reexamine policies from year to year unless it is warranted. Part of the desk audit happens when we receive your ESHAP application – the remainder of the desk audit occur in the weeks leading t your monitoring visit. Monitors must physically visit every shelter RISK Analysis

Where we are monitoring: The other half of the monitoring process will take place on-site, and include: Opening meeting to discuss the monitoring process and immediate findings and concerns from the desk audit A financial audit of a previous quarter of the program year being monitored (not necessarily at the same time as the program audit) A file review from the program year being monitored. The number of files will depend on the number of clients served with a VI-SPDAT in 2016. A physical bed count and inspection of required public postings. The physical bed count will be based on the most recent Housing Inventory Count (HIC). Physical inspection of the property in compliance with HUD Housing Quality Standards (not necessarily at the same time as the program audit) Opening Meeting: ED, shelter director, primary Navigator Financial, Plant, and Program Monitoring may be separate No less than 5 – we were directed to not give a name list by our agency auditor What is a bed? Not necessarily set up for family shelters with pack and plays – but they need to be readily accessible

When are we monitoring: Monitoring will occur throughout the program year. Each shelter will be monitored at least once a year. Shelters will be given a minimum of 30 days notice On-site monitoring should not last longer than one day, depending on the size of the shelter. Visits may last longer depending on any immediate findings or concerns monitoring staff may have. All shelter projects, regardless of location, will be visited. As written in the homeless rule and ESG regs

Why we are monitoring: First, we have to. As the main recipient and pass through for ESG funding in the state, it is our responsibility to make sure funds are utilized appropriately and in compliance with ESG regulations. Second, to minimize risk to the entire ESG funding in the state. Some shelters rely on ESG funds for the majority of their funding, and loss of these funds could have a devastating impact in areas that are already considered underserved. Third, to protect individual shelters if HUD decides to come audit an ESG funded program. ESG regulations are complicated and not always straightforward. MaineHousing as the pass through for the funding interprets the regulations and wants to be able to provide as much guidance and technical support as our funded shelters need to be in compliance with ESG funding. Finally, to reduce long-term homelessness in the state. The ESHAP program will only work if it is being administered correctly. Appropriate utilization of funds will help get the right people to the right (and limited) resources.

How we are monitoring: Risk Assessment: We will be conducting a multi-year risk assessment to determine future risk to the ESG program and to inform future monitoring activities. Shelters that score high on the assessment may have a more intense monitoring process than shelters who score low. Application Review: Reviewing submitted policies for ESHAP compliance (ESG/Maine Homeless Rule) Data & Security: Reviewing data submissions, performance and subrecipient data security. Financial Review: Review of subrecipient financial policies, procedures and internal control, as well as an audit of the financials from a previous quarter in the last program year. Client File Review: A review of a minimum number of files based on clients served with a VI-SPDAT. Verifying that coordinated entry is being utilized, clients are being made aware of their rights, and we are matching clients to the right resources. Facility Tour: Verifying the HIC, documenting that all necessary posted policies are posted. Physical Inspection: Physical inspection of all shelter properties funded with ESHAP funding.

Final Notes Monitoring should be a collaborative process with the agency and MaineHousing working together. We are not trying to “catch” anyone doing anything wrong, rather we want to help strengthen all ESG funded programs and protect future ESG funding in Maine.

Monitoring Dashboard Launchpad Verifying Homelessness and the homeless definition Attending CoC Keeping up with Housing Stability Plans Long Term Policy Consistency