Operational Experience with the ATLAS Pixel Detector at the LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Advertisements

The ATLAS Pixel Detector
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Introduction -
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Using the EUDET pixel telescope for resolution studies on silicon strip sensors with fine pitch Thomas Bergauer for the SiLC R&D collaboration 21. May.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Jornadas LIP, Dez P. Martins - CFTP-IST The NA60 Silicon Vertex Telescopes Dimuon measurements Dimuon measurements Vertex telescope used in: Vertex.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Pixel 2000 Workshop Christian Grah University of Wuppertal June 2000, Genova O. Bäsken K.H.Becks.
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
Overview and Status of the ATLAS Pixel Detector Claudia Gemme, CERN/INFN-Genova on behalf of the ATLAS Pixel Community 10th ICATPP Conference, Como, Oct.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
Timepix test-beam results and Sensor Production Status Mathieu Benoit, PH-LCD.
Operation & Performance of the ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker Dr. Petra Haefner Max-Planck-Institut für Physik.
E.Gushchin,S.Filippov(INR,Moscow) 16 April 2008Calo commissioning meeting CERN PS/SPD LED monitoring system status General status LED signal is used for.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
PIXEL 2000 P.Netchaeva INFN Genova 0 Results on 0.7% X0 thick Pixel Modules for the ATLAS Detector. INFN Genova: R.Beccherle, G.Darbo, G.Gagliardi, C.Gemme,
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
First collisions in LHC
USBPix Readout System using FE-I4/A Chip Status Update: ToT calibration and Finalization of Tuning Procedure Jimin Kim and Austin Piehl Department of Physics.
OMEGA3 & COOP The New Pixel Detector of WA97
Charge sensitive amplifier
FBK / INFN Roma, November , 17th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Sep th Hiroshima Xi’an Test-beam evaluation of newly developed n+-in-p planar pixel sensors aiming for use in high radiation environment.
for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Overview and status of the ATLAS Pixel Detector Attilio Andreazza Università di Milano and I.N.F.N. for the ATLAS Pixel Collaboration Layout of the ATLAS.
Prototype activities update
HV-MAPS Designs and Results I
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Roberto Chierici - CERN
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Design and fabrication of Endcap prototype sensors (petalet)
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning
BESIII EMC electronics
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

Operational Experience with the ATLAS Pixel Detector at the LHC Markus Keil 2nd Institute Of Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen and CERN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

The ATLAS Pixel Detector 3 hit-system for |η| < 2.5 3 barrel layers 2 x 3 endcap discs 1744 modules, 80M readout channels Innermost barrel layer at 5 cm Radiation tolerance 500 kGy / 1015 1MeV neq cm-2 Evaporative C3F8 cooling integrated in local support structures → Module temperatures < 0oC (Average temperature -13oC, warmest module at -5 oC) 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

The ATLAS Pixel Detector Module Sensor: 250 μm thick n-on-n sensor 47232 (328 x 144) pixels Typical pixel size 50 x 400 μm2 (50 x 600 μm2 pixels in gaps between FE chips) Bias voltage 150 – 600 V Readout: 16 FE chips, 2880 pixels each Zero suppression in the FE chip, MCC builds module event Pulse height measured by means of Time over Threshold Data transfer 40 – 160 MHz depending on layer 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Timeline May 2007 – Installation in ATLAS Sept 2008 – First cosmic events Oct 2008 – LHC incident Nov 2009 – First beam 450 GeV Dec 2009 – 900 GeV collisions March 2010 – 7 TeV Collisions May 2011 – Luminosity 1033 cm-2 s-1 Installation Calibration Cosmics 900 GeV Collisions 7 TeV Collisions 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Pixel Detector Status 96.7% of the detector active in data taking 55 Modules disabled (3.2%) (6 modules due to single optoboard failure) 47 FE chips disabled (0.16%) In particular FE failures are linked to thermal cycles → an attempt has been made to reduce the problem by smaller temperature variations with first modest results, more refinements will be tried Disabled modules by failure type: Inactive fraction per layer: B-layer 3.1 % Layer 1 1.4 % Layer 2 4.6 % Endcap A 2.8 % Endcap C 2.8 % Communication 26 Optoboard 6 Clock 3 LV HV 17 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Threshold and Noise Threshold scan: inject varying test charges and measure response curve: error function fit yields threshold and noise Threshold tuning: inject fixed test charge (threshold target) and vary the in- pixel threshold DAC. 50%-point gives optimal value In 2008 started with setting of 4000 e, working out of the box Setting now is 3500 e, resulting in an increase in number of masked pixels, but still negligible (0.1%) A successful attempt at 3000 e has been made during cosmic data taking but resulted in masking of many high-capacitance pixels More careful study will need to be done when beam schedule allows At the moment not really necessary as number of split clusters is already greatly reduced at 3500 e 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Threshold and Noise Typical threshold dispersion after tuning: s ~ 40 e Very few outliers in all pixel classes To be checked whether this can be improved in the tuning algorithms Noise for normal pixels ~170 e, higher in ganged pixels (~300 e) due to higher load capacitance Reflected in threshold over noise, but still >10 for “worst” pixel class, ~20 for normal pixels 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Noise Occupancy Pixels with hit rate higher than 10-5 in dedicated noise runs are masked online (0.1% @ 3500 e) A few additional noisy pixels (1-2*10-5) are masked offline on run-by-run basis After offline masking noise rate <10-9 corresponds to less than 0.1 noise hits per event in 80 million channels (without offline mask: ~1 hit/event in the full detector) 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Hit-to-Track Association Efficiency Hit-to-track association efficiency for the different parts of the detector Disabled modules have been excluded, dead regions not (Full efficiency of the B-layer due to track selection) Efficiency ~99% for nearly all parts Slightly lower efficiency in the outermost discs due to individual modules 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Time-over-Threshold Time-over-threshold (ToT, length of discriminator signal) depends on deposited charge discriminator threshold feedback current Information of the ToT (in units of 25 ns) is read out together with the hit information → measurement of the deposited charge 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

ToT Tuning and Calibration Time-over-threshold tuned pixel by pixel to 30 BC @ 20ke Calibration by means of test charge injections to reconstruct amount of deposited charge offline Example: Track dE/dx determined from ToT (truncated mean of all clusters) 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Timewalk and In-time Threshold Hits with lower charge suffer timewalk This leads to an “In-time threshold” higher than the discriminator threshold for a hit detection “in time” At 3500 e threshold: 4800 e for normal pixels Higher load capacitance has been compensated for in ganged and inter- ganged pixels Timewalk can be compensated for by on-chip hit doubling (using ToT information) In-time threshold 200 e above threshold Data volume increases (Testbeam: 10%) 4000 e Threshold 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Timing: Homogeneity and Stability Several steps for adjustment of timing: Trigger delays: from cosmic ray data Cable lengths: values measured during installation Final adjustment: timing scans with collisions After all adjustments: module-to- module dispersion: 0.007 BC (corresponds to 0.17 ns) Measured from average detection time for large charges Stability can be measured from stability of delay edge in Rx-scan For most modules maximum delay band position changes ≤ 2 ns 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Single-Pixel Leakage Current FE-Chip has the possibility to measure leakage current pixel by pixel (“Monleak”) Currently majority of pixels at 0 Measurement range and resolution optimised for after irradiation: LSB ~0.125 nA Single-pixel leakage current will be monitored with time In addition: we are equipping our DCS hardware with the possibility to measure the single-module leakage current with 20 nA precision First channels already equipped, rest following during MD phases 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Depletion Voltage Goal: measure voltage needed for full depletion VFD during calibration time Idea: use cross-talk, i.e. inject charge into one pixel, read out neighbour Before type inversion: When not fully depleted: (high- ohmic) short between pixels When fully depleted: pixels are isolated from each other Chose injected charge such that cross-talk hits are seen only for Vbias < Vpinch-off (≈VFD) Measured depletion voltage for all modules Example: single module close to depletion voltage White: (already depleted) pixels with no crosstalk hits Measurement shows structure of sensor production 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Bump Connectivity Test of bump connectivity: combination of several calibration measurements Disconnected bumps: Low noise No cross-talk to neighbour Merged candidates Digitally working, analogue dead pixels Example: particularly bad module: noise (top) and cross-talk hits (bottom) Overall fraction: 0.1% Comparison with beam data ongoing 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Outline The ATLAS Pixel Detector Operational Experience Tuning, calibration and performance Threshold and noise Charge measurement Timing Monitoring detector quality and radiation damage Examples of offline performance 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Charge Sharing Charge sharing can be determined from ToT and is used to improve the spatial resolution Calibration measurement: Residuals vs. charge sharing variable Slope is then used to correct “digital” hit position 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Spatial Resolution Residual distribution with newest alignment Width close to MC width for a perfectly aligned detector 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Lorentz Angle Measurement of Lorentz angle from cluster size vs. track angle Measured value close to expectation (225 mrad) 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Conclusions The ATLAS Pixel Detector has been calibrated and tuned to a stable working point 3500 e threshold Time over Threshold of 30 BC for 20 ke charge Performance at this working point is good Threshold Dispersion ~ 40 e, average noise ~ 170 e 4800 e average in-time threshold Charge measurement resolution < 1000 e Efficiency 98% - 99% Online noise occupancy O(10-8) Offline performance as expected Now preparing next steps: Define working points for higher luminosity and (for the somewhat further future) lower signals Use the available calibration measurements to monitor detector properties over time (leakage current, depletion voltage, bump connectivity) 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Backup 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Detector Safety Until “Stable Beams” are declared from the LHC, the sensor HV is off; This can be bypassed for calibration period. Warm start procedure: Modules are configured at the start of each run To avoid noise preamplifiers are off as long as HV is off When stable beams are declared HV is ramped up Preamplifiers are enabled 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

The Front-End Pixel Cell 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago

Interchip Region 2/19/2019 TIPP 2011, Chicago