Martin Bringmann, Dominique C. Bergmann  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Adhesion Disengagement Uncouples Intrinsic and Extrinsic Forces to Drive Cytokinesis in Epithelial Tissues  Charlène Guillot, Thomas Lecuit  Developmental.
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Wei-Hsiang Lin, Edo Kussell  Current Biology 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
A Mechanical Feedback Restricts Sepal Growth and Shape in Arabidopsis
Cell Division: Experiments and Modelling Unite to Resolve the Middle
Volume 17, Issue 24, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Clayton P. Mosher, Prisca E. Zimmerman, Katalin M. Gothard 
Spatiotemporal Brassinosteroid Signaling and Antagonism with Auxin Pattern Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Roots  Juthamas Chaiwanon, Zhi-Yong Wang 
Protein Interaction Analysis Provides a Map of the Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Ciliary Gating Zone  Daisuke Takao, Liang Wang, Allison Boss,
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Synaptotagmin SYTA Forms ER-Plasma Membrane Junctions that Are Recruited to Plasmodesmata for Plant Virus Movement  Amit Levy, Judy Y. Zheng, Sondra G.
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages (November 2014)
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Yvonne Stahl, René H. Wink, Gwyneth C. Ingram, Rüdiger Simon 
Halotropism Is a Response of Plant Roots to Avoid a Saline Environment
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Renzhi Yang, Jessica L. Feldman  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Phosphorylation of the Polarity Protein BASL Differentiates Asymmetric Cell Fate through MAPKs and SPCH  Ying Zhang, Xiaoyu Guo, Juan Dong  Current Biology 
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Ying Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Wanchen Shao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Juan Dong 
Actin Waves: Origin of Cell Polarization and Migration?
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Wood Cell-Wall Structure Requires Local 2D-Microtubule Disassembly by a Novel Plasma Membrane-Anchored Protein  Yoshihisa Oda, Yuki Iida, Yuki Kondo,
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 16, Pages e4 (August 2018)
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Non-overlapping Neural Networks in Hydra vulgaris
Myosin 2-Induced Mitotic Rounding Enables Columnar Epithelial Cells to Interpret Cortical Spindle Positioning Cues  Soline Chanet, Rishabh Sharan, Zia.
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Physical Forces Regulate Plant Development and Morphogenesis
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages (December 2009)
Krzysztof Wabnik, Hélène S. Robert, Richard S. Smith, Jiří Friml 
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (April 2013)
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
BASL Controls Asymmetric Cell Division in Arabidopsis
Franziska Aurich, Christian Dahmann  Cell Reports 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Microtubule Severing at Crossover Sites by Katanin Generates Ordered Cortical Microtubule Arrays in Arabidopsis  Quan Zhang, Erica Fishel, Tyler Bertroche,
Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Wood Cell-Wall Structure Requires Local 2D-Microtubule Disassembly by a Novel Plasma Membrane-Anchored Protein  Yoshihisa Oda, Yuki Iida, Yuki Kondo,
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Global Compression Reorients Cortical Microtubules in Arabidopsis Hypocotyl Epidermis and Promotes Growth  Sarah Robinson, Cris Kuhlemeier  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Tissue-wide Mechanical Forces Influence the Polarity of Stomatal Stem Cells in Arabidopsis  Martin Bringmann, Dominique C. Bergmann  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 877-883 (March 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2017 27, 877-883DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Global Orientation of BRXL2 Crescents Depends on Leaf Type and Region (A) Diagram of stomatal lineage cells in leaf context showing base (b), middle (m), and tip-most (t) thirds of the leaf (dashed line, midline). Protodermal cells become meristemoid mother cells (MMCs). Polar BRXL2 localization (yellow) precedes asymmetric cell division (ACD), resulting in a meristemoid (M) and a stomatal lineage ground cell (SLGC). Meristemoids can become MMCs and undergo multiple ACDs (circular arrow) before differentiation to guard cells. SLGCs differentiate into pavement cells (PCs). (B) MMC undergoing an ACD (from Movie S1). PM, plasma membrane. (C) Magnification of middle panel in (B). BRXL2 orientation angle α describes the angle between the leaf midline and the connection between cell center (circle) and the center of the BRXL2 subdomain (blue cross). Scale bars, 5 μm. (D) Histogram of α in first true leaves (7 dpi, n = 1,044 cells from four individuals) left (blue bars) and right (yellow bars) of the midline. (E) Bias in α (absolute values) at base (n = 368), middle (n = 370), and tip (n = 117), from three individuals. (F) Histogram of α for cotyledons (4 dpi, n = 385 cells from three individuals). See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 877-883DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Growth and Polarity Analysis of Leaf Epidermis (A and B) Relative (A) and absolute (B) growth rates (6.5-dpi true leaves, 17 hr) represented as heatmaps (t0). (C) Growth anisotropy. White bars, PDGmax for cells with anisotropy ≥15%. (D–F) Magnified regions corresponding to boxes in (C). (G) BRXL2 orientation (red arrows) at t0 and PDGmax (white bars) for the same cells after the growth period (t0–t17). (H) αG describes the difference between α and PDGmax (n = 628 cells from four individuals). Scale bars, 50 (A–C) and 10 μm (D–G). Current Biology 2017 27, 877-883DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mechanical Perturbations Directly Influence α (A) Ablation scheme (upper panel). αA describes BRXL2 orientation (red line) in a given cell (here, blue with yellow circle at cell center) with reference to the ablation center (white line, green circle). (B) BRXL2-YFP in cells bordering ablation site (gray area) 16 hr after ablation. (C) αA measured in all cells in color-coded circles in (B) (n = 175 cells from six individuals). (D) BRXL2-YFP (yellow asterisk) localizes toward the ablation site (gray) (from Movie S2). Magenta, PM-RFP. (E) Scheme of stretch experiments. Increasing degrees of stretch were imposed on 4-dpi cotyledons, 90° to the midline. (F) Histograms for α at increasing stretch intensities (0%–60%) (n = 3,571 cells from ten or more individuals per stretch intensity). (G) α in stretch direction (80°–100°). Welch’s t test, ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01; n.s., not significant. Scale bars, 10 μm (A and B) and 5 μm (D). See also Figures S2 and S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 877-883DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions among Microtubules, BRXL2, and Peptide Signals during Leaf Development (A) Scheme of leaf blade (purple) and midvein (gray). Orientation of α (arrows) in BRXL2-expressing blade cells parallels general growth direction of midline. In atktn1 global BRXL2 orientation is randomized. (B) α in wild-type and atktn1 (n = 447 cells from five individuals in atktn1, n = 357 cells from four individuals in wild-type). (C–F) Images of BRXL2-YFP (C and D) and TUA5-mCherry (E and F). Ablation was immediately followed by 100-mM oryzalin treatment overnight (inset in E). BRXL2-YFP polarization and orientation relative to the ablation site is maintained (C). Mock treatments are shown in (D) and (F). (G) Time lapse of BRXL2-YFP and TUA5mCherry shows the arrival of BRXL2 at the membrane slightly before PPB establishment. Arrowheads indicate sites of PPB establishment (magenta) and BRXL2 polarization (yellow) (Movie S3). Time stamp, hr:min. (H) Quantification of (G). Difference in time points for first visible BRXL2 polarity and PPB formation is shown. Gray box indicates instances where BRXL2 polarity was detected first (n = 21 cells from three individuals). (I) pEPF1::NLS-CFP expression in 7-dpi leaf. (J) Percentage of cells expressing EPF1 in subpopulations along the proximal-distal axis (n = 4 individuals). Scale bars, 5 μm (G) and 20 μm (C–F and I). See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2017 27, 877-883DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.059) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions