Phase II study on the combination of trabectedin and olaparib for advanced, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Dr Giorgio Valabrega University of Torino,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AbstractSchema Conclusion Pharmacokinetic profile of the base-excision repair inhibitor Methoxyamine-HCl (TRC102; MX) given as an one-hour intravenous.
Advertisements

Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase 1b Study of Iniparib (BSI-201) Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 Cell Cycle Effects of Iniparib plus Gemcitabine.
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide in Patients with Previously Treated,
O’Shaughnessy J et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 1007.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
Bortezomib (BTZ) and Panobinostat (PAN) Combination Is Effective in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) or NK/T-Cell Lymphoma.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
1SOLO 2 - June
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida ARRAY : Phase II Trial of Carfilzomib.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences U.O.C Medical Oncology Director: Prof A. Russo Ovarian cancer Case Report 1 Dr. Lorena Incorvaia,
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida Venetoclax + Decitabine or Azacitidine in.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
ESMO 2016 Durvalumab Data Study / Abstract Ph Indication Line N Arms
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
Phase II SAKK 35/10 Trial: Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Shows Durable Activity in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Claudia Marchetti Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
CHEMO-IMMUNO-TARGET THERAPIES
ABRAMYO Phase I-II study of weekly nab paclitaxel in combination with liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with HER2 negative MBC Alessandra.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Combined Inhibition of PD-L1, MEK, and BRAF Active in Advanced Melanoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
A Phase Ib Study of CRLX101 in Combination with Weekly Paclitaxel in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Adrian Senderowicz, MD 19 May 2016.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Abraxane-Pembro nei carcinomi uroteliali avanzati
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
An Introduction to DNA Damage Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
PARP and Other DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Solid Tumors: An Update
Activity Goals. Perspectives on PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Has the Time Come for Individualized Care?
Participating groups:
Role of Androgen Receptor (AR) in Ovarian Cancer
CTCL: INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS GEMCITABINE
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Randomized phase III trial on Trabectedin (ET 743) vs clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers.
MAINTENANCE THERAPY WITH PARP INHIBITORS
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
DISCLOSURE SLIDE Nothing to disclosure.
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Phase II study on the combination of trabectedin and olaparib for advanced, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Dr Giorgio Valabrega University of Torino, FPO,IRCCS Candiolo giorgio.valabrega@ircc.it Da sistemare con loghi e programma 1

AGENDA Rationale for novel therapies in EOC Rationale for Olaparib and Trabectedin in ovarian cancer Results from the phase Ib TOMAS trial Study Design UPDATE Modified from O’Shaughnessy J, et al. ASCO 2009

Rationale for exploring novel combinations in PR Ovarian cancer Pujade-Loraine JCO 2014 Presented by:

BACKGROUND Trabectedin chemotherapy Inflicts DNA damage via single strand breaks Tr PARP1 4. Replication fork collapse Double-strand DNA breaks PARP1 3. Inhibition of PARP1 Disables DNA base-excision repair 2. PARP1 upregulation Base-excision repair of DNA damage PARP1 PARP1 Modified from O’Shaughnessy J, et al. ASCO 2009

DMR leiomyosarcoma cells Preclinical activity of Olaparib and Trabectedin (1) DMR leiomyosarcoma cells Olaparib blocks both basal and trabectedin induced PARP1 ezymatic activity. The combination of trabectedin and olaparib increases DNA damage if compared to single agents This kind of damage is unrepairable and leads to DNA fragmentation, cell cycle arrest and finally to apoptosis The combination of trabectedin and olaparib shows antitumor and antimetastatic activity in in vivo models Pignochino Y, et al. Presented by:

Synergistic effect of trabectedin and olaparib in human cell lines (regardless BRCA mutations) Arroyo et al JBC 2015

Olaparib single agent in platinum resistant ovarian cancer Kaufmann JCO 2015 Gelmon Lancet Oncol 2011 Kaufman, JCO 2015

MITO-15: Phase II study on trabectedin in patients with BRCAness phenotype or BRCA mutated advanced ovarian cancer Aim of the study Evaluate activity of trabectedin in patients with mutated BRCA and BRCAness phenotype advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) Patients and methods Patients with BRCA mutations or BRCAness phenotype with at least 2 previous responses to platinum therapy were stratified as patients with <3 previous responses to platinum (PR) or patients with ≥3 previous platinum responses (PS). Trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 (3 hour iv infusion) administered every 3 weeks until progression Lorusso Ann Oncol 2016 Lorusso D et al. ESMO 2014 Abstract 886PD.

Response to trabectedin in according to BRCA status: Trabectedin is effective also in BRCA WT patients Lorusso D et al. ESMO 2014 Abstract 886PD.

Feasibility of Olaparib and trabectedin: TOMAS trial – Study design Run-in period First Cycle Subsequent Cycles Trabectedin Trabectedin -9 -5 -4 -1 2 1 day 1 7 14 21 7 14 21 Olaparib Wash out Olaparib Secondary Study Objectives Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of preliminary evidence of activity (progression-free survival, growth modulation index, best overall tumor response; clinical benefit rate; duration of response and overall survival) To identify potential relationships (predictive/prognostic) between several bio-markers in the tumor tissue and genotype and the observed results. Typical 3+3 design Trabectedin doses: 0.675-1.3 mg/m2 as a 24-h i.v. infusion q 3 wks Olaparib tablets doses: 100-300 mg q12 h Primary Study Objective Maximum tolerated dose of the combination of trabectedin and olaparib.

TOMAS trial – Study population Patients ≥ 18 yrs affected by advanced, unresectable/metastatic bone and soft tissue sarcomas progressing after at least first-line treatment for advanced disease Histotype N (%) Leiomyosarcoma 8 (29) Osteosarcoma 6 (21) Ewing Sarcoma 4 (14) Synovial Sarcoma UPS 1 (4) Sarcoma NAS Liposarcoma MPNST SFT Malignant Myoepithelioma TOT 28 Characteristic N (%) Total 28 (100) Sex -Male -Female 17 (61) 11 (39) Age -Median -Range 50 19-78 Previous lines -Mean 3 2 1-8

TOMAS trial – most relevant toxicities

MTD: trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 q3wks + olaparib tablets 150 mg q12h TOMAS trial – Results DLTs at dose level 5 (Trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 + Olaparib tablets 200 mg q12 h): Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia Grade 4 Neutropenia lasting >7 days Expansion of lower dose levels including intermediate dose levels MTD: trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 q3wks + olaparib tablets 150 mg q12h

TOMAS trial – Results n° of cycles Treatment ongoing Treatment ended Presented by:

TROOPS Trial Design Trabe 1,1 mg/mq 24h ic 1/21 + Olaparib 300 mg/die EOC P-res and P-ref Trabe 1,1 mg/mq 24h ic 1/21 + Olaparib 300 mg/die Key inclusion criteria: serous or endometrioid, BRCA WT or mut < o = 2 previous lines Stratification: Platinum refractory(cohort A) vs platinum resistant (cohort B) PIs: M. Aglietta, G. Grignani, D.Lorusso, G.Valabrega Presented by:

Statistical considerations Cohort A Sample size calculated according to a Bayesian phase II design on two outcome measures: ORR and PFS at 4 months. (20 patients foreseen in this cohort, 10 patients before applying stopping rules) Cohort B Sample size calculated according to Simon optimal 2 step design with 4 months PFS as main endpoint (46 patients foreseen in this cohort, 15 patients in first stage) Presented by:

Endpoints COHORT A (PFI < 4 weeks) Primary endpoints: PFS at 4 months and RR Secondary endpoints: OS, PFS, Duration of response, clinical benefit rate, CA 125 decrease, Qol, safety COHORT B Primary endpoints: PFS at 4 months Presented by:

Endpoints (2) Translational endpoints (molecular and genetics, exploratory analises on the probably small subgroup of BRCA mut/HRD+ ) Presented by:

Presented by:

Current status of the protocol Financial support confirmed by AZ and Pharmamar CRO (also for Pharmacovigilance) defined Insurance defined Regulatory submission scheduled by 13/03/2018 First patient likely to be enrolled end of May 2018 Presented by: