Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

Illustrations of Models of State Higher Education Structure*
STRONG FOUNDATIONS STRONG FOUNDATIONS The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems 2012 Update on Postsecondary Data Sharing with K-12 and Labor 26 th.
PARTISAN CONTROL AND STATE DECISIONS ABOUT OBAMACARE FULL GO STATES (n = 22) Arkansas Michigan CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA COLORADO NEVADA CONNECTICUT New Hampshire.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
STRONG FOUNDATIONS STRONG FOUNDATIONS The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems 2012 Update on Postsecondary Data Sharing with K-12 and Labor Downloadable.
Horizon 2023 National Enrollment Projections and the Role of California Dr. Lisa Castellino Institutional Research and Planning Data sourced from NCES.
Washington Tuition and Fee Report House Higher Education Committee January 21, 2004.
STRONG FOUNDATIONS STRONG FOUNDATIONS The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems 2012 Update on Postsecondary Data Sharing with K-12 and Labor Downloadable.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Where We All Came From, State By State 2014 ACTIVITY.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education J. Michael Mullen WVFAA November 6, 2003.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
State Support for Higher Education Illinois Board of Higher Education January 26, 2010 Paul E. Lingenfelter, President State Higher Education Executive.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1 Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Atlantic Ocean Pacific Ocean Washington DC 90. What ocean is on the East Coast of the United States? 89. What ocean is on the West Coast of the United.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
SUSTAINABLE EMPLOYMENT DATA PARTNERSHIPS!
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
ADP Network Policy Agenda
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Fifty nifty United States
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Regions of the United States
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems
Presidential Electoral College Map
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

Strong Foundations The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems 2012 Update on Postsecondary Data Sharing with K-12 and Labor Downloadable Maps from the Report These maps represent Figure 1 through Figure 11 from the main report, Strong Foundations: The State of State Postsecondary Data Systems: 2012 Update on Data Sharing with K-12 and Labor. The main report and all associated resources are available online: http://www.sheeo.org/resources/publications/strong-foundations-state-state-postsecondary-data-systems-2012-update-data. The following abbreviations are used in the maps for states with more than one state postsecondary agency/entity: California California Community Colleges (CCC) California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC) The California State University and Colleges (CSU) University of California System (UCS) Florida Florida Department of Education (DOE) State University System of Florida Board of Governors (BOG) Minnesota Minnesota Office of Higher Education (MOHE) Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MNSCU) New York City University of New York (CUNY) New York State Education Department Office of Higher Education (NYSED) The State University of New York (SUNY) North Carolina North Carolina Community College System (NCCCS) University of North Carolina (UNC) Oregon Oregon Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development (ODCC) Oregon University System (OUS) Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Department of Education Office of Postsecondary and Higher Education (PDE) Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) Vermont University of Vermont (UVM) Vermont State Colleges (VSC) Washington Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges (SBCTC) Washington Student Achievement Council (WSAC) Wyoming University of Wyoming (UWYO) Wyoming Community College Commission (WCCC)

Figure 1: Coordinated, multi-sector data sharing, 2009-present Sharing data via inclusion in state P-20 data warehouses or federated data models has recently emerged as one of the options available to state postsecondary agencies/entities wishing to increase their data sharing capacity with other state agencies/entities. Figure 1 shows states with multi-sector data sharing where the state postsecondary agency/entity plays a role. In 2009, eight states had a state P-20 data warehouse or federated data model. Today, 19 states (including D.C.) have established such structures and 20 additional states are in the process. It was beyond the scope of this update to detail which of these data sharing relationships originated as individual agreements, as part of the state’s effort to build a P-20 data warehouse or federated data model, or both.

Figure 2: Thirty-four states sharing data with K-12, labor, or both agencies (2009) As was the case in 2009, the most common data sharing agreements exist between the state postsecondary agency/entity and the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies. Figure 2 specifically details the postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) agency back in 2009. Note: Postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and/or labor/workforce agencies may or may not take place via the state P-20 data warehouses or federated data models.

Figure 3: Forty states sharing data with K-12, labor, or both agencies (2012) As was the case in 2009, the most common data sharing agreements exist between the state postsecondary agency/entity and the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies. Figure 3 specifically details the existing postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) agency in 2012. Note: Postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and/or labor/workforce agencies may or may not take place via the state P-20 data warehouses or federated data models.

Figure 4: Thirteen states in the process of establishing data sharing with K-12, labor, or both (2009) Figure 4 specifically details the postsecondary data sharing agreements that were in progress with the state education (K-12) agency back in 2009. Note: Postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and/or labor/workforce agencies may or may not take place via the state P-20 data warehouses or federated data models.

Figure 5: Eight states in the process of establishing data sharing with K-12, labor, or both (2012) Figure 5 specifically details the postsecondary data sharing agreements that are in progress with the state education (K-12) agency in 2012. Note: Postsecondary data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and/or labor/workforce agencies may or may not take place via the state P-20 data warehouses or federated data models.

Figure 6: Twenty-three states with access to elements from the K-12 agency (2009) The vast majority of the state postsecondary agencies/entities with data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies also have access to the data elements these other state agencies collect. Figure 6 specifically details postsecondary access to K-12 data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) agency back in 2009. In 2009, Maryland, North Dakota, and Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania State System for Higher Education, PASSHE) had data sharing agreements with their respective state education agency (K-12), where they provided postsecondary data to these state education agencies, but the agreement did not include postsecondary access to K-12 data elements.

Figure 7: Thirty-four states with access to elements from the K-12 agency (2012) The vast majority of the state postsecondary agencies/entities with data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies also have access to the data elements these other state agencies collect. Figure 7 specifically details existing postsecondary access to K-12 data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) agency in 2012. California (The California State University and Colleges, University of California System), North Carolina (University of North Carolina), Ohio, Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education), Vermont (Vermont State Colleges), and West Virginia are among the states that obtain K-12 elements via the institutions of higher education (IHEs) that report data to the state postsecondary agencies/entities, rather than via data sharing with the state K-12 agency.

Figure 8: Twenty-three states with access to elements from the labor/workforce agency (2009) The vast majority of the state postsecondary agencies/entities with data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies also have access to the data elements these other state agencies collect. Figure 8 specifically details postsecondary access to labor data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state labor/workforce agency back in 2009. In 2009, Maine, Mississippi, and North Dakota had data sharing agreements with their respective state labor/workforce agency, where they provided postsecondary data to these state labor/workforce agencies, but the agreement did not include postsecondary access to labor data elements.

Figure 9: Thirty-three states with access to elements from the labor/workforce agency (2012) The vast majority of the state postsecondary agencies/entities with data sharing agreements with the state education (K-12) and labor/workforce agencies also have access to the data elements these other state agencies collect. Figure 7 specifically details existing postsecondary access to labor data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state labor/workforce agency in 2012.

Figure 10: Fourteen states with access to elements from both the K-12 and labor agencies (2009) Figure 10 specifically details postsecondary access to both K-12 and labor agency data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state K-12 and labor/workforce agencies back in 2009.

Figure 11: Twenty-eight states with access to elements from both the K-12 and labor agencies (2012) Figure 11 specifically details existing postsecondary access to both K-12 and labor agency data elements by virtue of the data sharing agreements with the state K-12 and labor/workforce agencies in 2012. The number of states where state postsecondary agencies/entities have gained access to both K-12 and labor data elements from those respective state agencies has doubled in the past three years.