PTEST Implementation Survey on Principal Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 2: Analyzing teaching and providing feedback Leadership Series July 2012.
Advertisements

Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
Leadership Roles and EDS. Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Topic Information 1.Leadership and Leader Evaluator roles in EDS 2.Notifications 3.Q &
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
Senate Advisory Committee on Assessment Practitioner Survey Results.
November 1, 2011 with Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
North Dakota Principal and Teacher Evaluation. Welcome! What is your present status? Change! The Why and How of PTESS Update on PTESS progress and timeline.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program By Chris Sipperley, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee November 14th, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Presentation by Dr. Doug Bower. Always in motion is the future -Master Yoda.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Oak Park Elementary School District 97. Common Core 7:00 p.m.Overview: Why Common Core? 7:20 p.m.Breakout Sessions  Mini Lessons – Experience Common.
Session Materials  Wiki
O UR S CHOOLS E VALUATION P ROCESS Brad, Chad, Holly, Katie, Lily, and Pat.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.
COMPLETING A LEADERSHIP OBSERVATION MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP
Kim Macchiarelli Nicole Shema Pam Felts Doreen Bruce Marina Cangialosi.
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
INSTRUCTIONAL FRAMEWORK PUYALLUP SCHOOL DISTRICT WHAT it is and WHY we have one.
Special Education Procedures Information from Illinois Rules and Regulations Part 226 Special Education
PURPOSES OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
$200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1000 $200.
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T - H I V P R I O R I T Y 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Principal Survey Results.
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T - H I V P R I O R I T Y 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Lead Health Education Teacher.
New Teacher Induction.
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T
S U B U R B A N C O O K C O U N T Y 2012 School Health Profiles Report
PTESS Implementation Survey on Teacher Evaluation
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Work Group November 15, 2012
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T
Teacher Evaluation System
Program Review Update. Monthly Superintendents Webcast May 18, 2011 Kentucky Department of Education.
APPR Update School Year.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:
MILITARY VOLUNTEER STRATEGY
مراجعة عامة.
Peer Observations
Total Full-Time Equivalent Faculty by Primary Appointment,
Total Faculty by Status and Gender,
Chi Square Two-way Tables
Principal Scaled Leadership
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Identification of PHLOTE Students
Label Name Label Name Label Name Label Name Label Name Label Name
I N D I A N A 2016 School Health Profiles Report
Total Faculty by Status and Gender,
Department of Curriculum & Instruction
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
IEP and the ARD Process.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Teacher Practice Instruments
Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems
Categorical Data In Chapter 3 we introduced the idea of categorical data. In Chapter 15 we explored probability rules and when events are independent.
Evaluation Plan Group interview Post-session questionnaire
Teacher PGES via EDS Peer Observation August 22, 2013
SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System
Presentation transcript:

PTEST Implementation Survey on Principal Evaluation Conducted in April, 2017 134 responses on teacher evaluation 85 principals 47 superintendents 2 others

Responses by position and size of school Count of 4. What is your primary position? Column Labels Row Labels 1,001+ K-12 students 1-300  K-12 students 301-500 K-12 students 501-1,000 K-12 students Grand Total Other 1 2 Principal or Assistant Principal 27 37 13 7 84 Superintendent or Assistant Superintendent 10 20 47 58 23 15 133

Danielson had 45% with two formal, and almost 80% with one or two. Marzano had 35% with two, and 80% with one or two. Marshall had 33% with none, and 58% with two. Marshall pushes for mini-observations.

Danielson had 45% with two formal, and almost 80% with one or two. Marzano had 35% with two, and 80% with one or two. Marshall had 33% with none, and 58% with two. Marshall pushes for mini-observations.

Comments are in handouts

Implications?