System Performance Measures: Goal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6, 2013 Suzanne Wagner, Housing Innovations 1.
Advertisements

A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Webinar Series Priority 1/Surge National Kick-Off October 16, 2014.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
OCTOBER 2012 MONTGOMERY COUNTY ROADMAP FOR HOUSING STABILITY.
Chicago’s Plan to End Homelessness A Briefing for the Harris School of Public Policy Presented by: John W. Pfeiffer, MPA First Deputy Commissioner Chicago.
Where the Two Can Meet: Merging Transitional Housing with Rapid Re-Housing Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness October 21, 2010.
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
Strategic Action Plan to End Homelessness Presentation to Interagency Council on Homelessness March 2010.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
System Performance Measures WIBOSCOC Data Committee: CoC Workgroup August 2015.
RACINE COC DATA SNAPSHOT February 21, EMERGENCY SHELTER USAGE
Opportunities to Address Homelessness in California Sharon Rapport, CSH.
Homelessness in Marin Presented by the Homeforall Speakers Bureau.
Homeless Crisis Response System
New Department on Homelessness: The Development Process.
All Home Stakeholder Meeting July 20, Agenda Welcome General Updates Measuring System Performance in King County Role of System Performance and.
Homeless Continuum of Care Activities. Continuum Overview COMMUNITY SERVICES HUD requires all communities receiving McKinney-Vento homeless services funds.
Presentation to the Joint CSAC/LCC Homelessness Task Force
Michelle Covert, , County of Santa Clara Office of supportive housing Mission, role, Strategies in addressing.
Hudson County Division of Housing and Community Development
2016 Coc visioning session December 20, 2016.
Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program (ESHAP)
Housing and Homeless Coalition: State of Homelessness 2015
Emergency Solutions Grant Consolidated Plan
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) 2017 HIC and PIT Count
Virginia’s Road2Home Project
Housing First: Ending Homelessness in North Carolina
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Rapid Rehousing Programs
Kay Moshier McDivitt; Senior Technical Assistance Specialist
A Home for Everyone Conference
2017 Conference on Ending Homelessness Seattle/King County
KYHMIS BOS 2017 Data Standards Updates
5.14 Ending Long Stays in Shelter
Lake County Homeless Needs Assessment
Allocation Plan 2016 Continuum of Care NOFA.
Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes,
Continuum of care for the homeless
Maine CoC Coordinated Entry
Norm Suchar, Director Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Audrey Field, Deputy Director/Director of Programs
Systems Performance Measures: The Fundamentals Session 1
LESAR DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Ending Homelessness & Data
Annual Homeless Point-in-Time & Housing Inventory Count
Why we are doing this – RRH – reduce shelter length of stay
Ending Family Homelessness in Cuyahoga County
System Performance Measure Reports
Coordinated Entry System
Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program (ESHAP)
Appendix B: Capacity and Utilization as of 8/31/2018
Lessons Learned and Work to Do
Arizona’s 3 CoCs What is a CoC and why should you care?
Capital Area Coalition on Homelessness
What we learned system performance az balance of state coc
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
3.02 Assessing Shelter Capacity
Behavioral Wellness Community Housing and Support Services
A Proven, Permanent Solution To Homelessness
Eligible Costs 24 CFR 578 Subpart D.
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
Keys to Housing Security
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
Tackling Homelessness in Mesa
Presentation transcript:

Your Daily Work Affects the System! Maricopa Regional Continuum of Care

System Performance Measures: Goal HUD started tracking 3 years ago in FY 2015. Lastest data submitted to HUD= FY 17 (Oct 2016 – Sept. 2017) Ensure that the local homelessness response is a coordinated system Not funding sources/programs operating independently System Performance Measures: Goal

Who Affects the System? YOU!!! Clients Who Affects the System? YOU!!! Funders Providers Work Together!!! Collaborative Applicant: MAG HMIS Lead Funders HUD: CoC, ESG, PATH, RHY, HOPWA, SSVF, GPD DES AZ DOH Maricopa County Cities Private Foundations Collaborative Applicant: MAG in Maricopa County Reports SPMs to HUD Coordinated Entry Singles and Families HMIS Lead Providers that provide programs Homeless Prevention Street Outreach Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing Rapid Rehousing Coordinated Entry

Coverage: Maricopa County 9,224 mi2 24 municipalities https://www.tripsavvy.com/map-of-phoenix-area-maricopa-county-4135541

Performance Measures: RARE Data Maricopa County Numbers First Time Homeless Last 2 years, not in shelter / temporary housing (ES/TH); or Last 2 years, not in shelter, temporary housing (ES / TH) or perm housing (RRH / PSH) ~8,000: not in shelter or temp housing ~10,000: also not in perm housing Total # Sheltered Annual Sheltered HMIS Data ~14,000 PIT Count: One Day One Day Sheltered One Day Unsheltered ~3,500 (FY18: 200 up) ~ 2,000 (FY18: 600 up)

Performance Measures: BRIEF Data Maricopa County Numbers Length of Time Homelessness Average number of days homeless ES only; or ES + TH ES only: ~60 days ES + TH: ~100 days Increases in Income Note: CoC projects only Stayers: stayed in program during FY17 Percent of stayers increasing employment income Percent of stayers increasing non-employment income Percent of stayers increasing total income Employment income: ~5% Non-employment income: ~35% Total income: ~35% Performance Measures: BRIEF Employment job: earned income Non-employment income: SSI / SSDI Total monthly income

Performance Measures: NON-RECURRING Data Maricopa County Numbers Returns to Homelessness From street outreach and permanent housing, went to perm housing (2 yrs before), and returned to homelessness Within 6 months 6 – 12 months 2 years Street Outreach: Never had housing before. Double compared to PH w/6 mo: ~20% 6-12 mo: ~10% 2 years: 35% Permanent Housing w/ 6 mo: ~10% 6-12 mo: ~5% 2 years: ~20% Successful Placements Percentage of Clients Successfully Placed into Permanent Housing from Street Outreach From SO (exits): ~10% From RRH/PSH (exit or maintain): ~90% Performance Measures: NON-RECURRING

What Can We Do? Within Our Control Measures Activities First Time Homeless Total # Sheltered Enhance diversion practices Connect clients to CAP offices that have prevention dollars RARE

What Can We Do? Within Our Control Measures Activities Length of Time Homelessness Practice Housing First Lower eligibility requirements Avoid evictions and terminations, (rare exceptions) Effectively Case Manage Effectively assess housing barriers Develop housing plans that link people to right type of assistance (and no more than necessary) Train clients on how to be low risk tenants Focus on long-term stayers Provide good data entry!!! Partner with Landlords Increases in Income Note: CoC projects only Participate in SOAR to get clients SSI and SSDI benefits Job training and Life Skills Training What Can We Do? Within Our Control BRIEF

What Can We Do? Within Our Control Measures Activities Returns to Homelessness Partner with behavioral health programs, medical programs and workforce development programs Life skills and tenant training Connect clients with social supports Progressively engage clients Successful Placements Develop deeper relationship and rapport with clients and conduct full assessments Develop deeper relationships with landlords Focus on move-on strategy where appropriate (opens space for someone else). Partner with PHAs. Develop more RRH, PSH and affordable housing What Can We Do? Within Our Control NON-RECURRING

IMPACT MAG staffs the Maricopa CoC and reports SPMs to HUD. If we improve our SPMs, we may get more funding for CoC programs for our community! What you do daily matters!!!  IMPACT

Questions? Kinari Patel, JD, MSW Human Services Planner Maricopa Association of Governments kpatel@azmag.gov