Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ipsilateral Breast Metastasis: A Simple Coincidence? Hsu-Ching Huang, MD, Jen-Fan Hang, MD, Mei-Han Wu, MD, Teh-Ying Chou, MD,
Advertisements

The determination of a dose deposited in reference medium due to (p,n) reaction occurring during proton therapy Anna Dawidowska, Monika Paluch Ferszt,
Trine Grantzau, Mette Skovhus Thomsen, Michael Væth, Jens Overgaard 
Assessment of leakage dose in vivo in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer  Peta Lonski, Tomas Kron, Michael Taylor, Alicia Phipps, Rick.
Clinical evaluation of interfractional variations for whole breast radiotherapy using 3- dimensional surface imaging  Amish P. Shah, PhD, Tomas Dvorak,
Improved outcome of treating locally advanced lung cancer with the use of Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT): A case report  Beatriz E. Amendola, Naipy C. Perez,
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Retrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy  Nicola S. Russell, Inge.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Pain in cancer survivors; filling in the gaps
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Dosimetric Benefits and Practical Pitfalls of Daily Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer  Nancy El-Bared, MD,
A multi-centre dosimetry audit on advanced radiotherapy in lung as part of the Isotoxic IMRT study  Yat Tsang, Antony Carver, Nicki Groom, Catherine Harris,
Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy  Jinkoo Kim, James S.
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Patient-reported symptoms and performance status before palliative radiotherapy in geriatric cancer patients (octogenarians)  Carsten Nieder, Thomas A.
Michiel van den Bosch, Michel Öllers, Bart Reymen, Wouter van Elmpt 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Results of a Multicentric In Silico Clinical Trial (ROCOCO): Comparing Radiotherapy with Photons and Protons for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer  Erik Roelofs,
Phantom Verification of AAA and Acuros Dose Calculations for Lung Cancer: Do Tumor Size and Regression Matter?  Satomi Shiraishi, PhD, Luis E. Fong de.
VMAT radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy: The incidental effect of low-dose bath exposure  G. Lazzari, A. Terlizzi,
National audit of a system for rectal contact brachytherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Improving CT quality with optimized image parameters for radiation treatment planning and delivery guidance  Guang-Pei Chen, George Noid, An Tai, Feng.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Axillary radiotherapy for nodal lymphoma: What CTV expansion is required to account for absence of pre-chemotherapy treatment position FDG PET-CT?  Robin.
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics features during dose-painted radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer  Sangjune.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer  Nina Boje.
Kiran Devisetty, MD, Joseph K. Salama, MD  Journal of Thoracic Oncology 
Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy  Nicholas J. Lowther, David A.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT- based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer  Sweet Ping.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation  Ingrid Kristensen, Kristina Nilsson, Måns Agrup, Karin Belfrage,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems  Nick Reynaert, Frederik Crop, Edmond Sterpin, Iwan Kawrakow,
Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy  A. van.
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Comparison of organ-specific-radiation dose levels between 70kVp perfusion CT and standard tri-phasic liver CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski 
Uncertainty evaluation of image-based tumour control probability models in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using a visual analytic tool  Oscar Casares-Magaz,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact.
Design, fabrication, and validation of patient-specific electron tissue compensators for postmastectomy radiation therapy  Daniel F. Craft, Peter Balter,
Rectal volume variations and estimated rectal dose during 8 weeks of image-guided radical 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer 
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Aisling Krishnan, Yat Man Tsang, Adéle Stewart-Lord 
Todd J. Carpenter, MD, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD 
Rune Slot Thing, Uffe Bernchou, Olfred Hansen, Carsten Brink 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Peter de Boer, Stefano Mandija, Anita M
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer  Jan Seppälä, Aleksi Voutilainen,
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Presentation transcript:

Impact of lung density on the lung dose estimation for radiotherapy of breast cancer  Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 3, Pages 5-10 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 The lung density in the isocenter plane for the patients given LGL (left) and tangential breast (right) treatments with plans for FB (open circles) and DIBH (filled circles). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 5-10DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 The lung density for the 5 LGL cases, FB (left) DIBH (right), measured at three different planes: isocenter (filled circles); caudal plane across tangential fields (crosses); cranial plane across anterior/posterior field (open circles). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 5-10DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Difference between V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy and V40Gy for ipsilateral lung calculated with AAA and AXB. Left: 5 FB (O) and 5 DIBH (+) loco-regional treatment plans. Right: 9 FB (O) and 9 DIBH (+) tangential (right) breast treatment plans. Each patient has a specific color indicating which O and+that belongs to that patient (each patient has two CT scans – one FB and one DIBH). Lung density in isocenter plane on the x-axis. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 5-10DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Lung density in isocenter plane within the 15% isodose for patients planned for LGL (left) and tangential breast (right) treatments that have treatment plans planned on DIBH CT scans. The DIBH CT scan lung density for the patients with both FB and DIBH scans are also shown for comparison. The larger dots indicate the plans chosen for AAA, AXB and MC comparisons. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 5-10DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 DVH for ipsilateral lung for a LGL (left) and a tangential (right) breast cancer treatment plan that were planned on the DIBH CT scan with the lowest lung densities observed. Dose calculated with AAA, AXB (dose to water), AXBDtM (dose to medium) and MC (2mm and 7mm voxels). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 5-10DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.07.001) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions