Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Xue Q. Gong, Chunfen Zhang, Michael Feig, Zachary F. Burton 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Structural Basis of Transcriptional Pausing in Bacteria
Transformation Efficiency of RasQ61 Mutants Linked to Structural Features of the Switch Regions in the Presence of Raf  Greg Buhrman, Glenna Wink, Carla.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Takuo Osawa, Hideko Inanaga, Chikara Sato, Tomoyuki Numata 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
A Central Role of the RNA Polymerase Trigger Loop in Active-Site Rearrangement during Transcriptional Pausing  Innokenti Toulokhonov, Jinwei Zhang, Murali.
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis for NusA Stabilized Transcriptional Pausing
Hubert Kettenberger, Karim-Jean Armache, Patrick Cramer  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selection by T7 RNA Polymerase
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Functional Architecture of RNA Polymerase I
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Structural Insight into Translesion Synthesis by DNA Pol II
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
RNA Polymerase Backtracking in Gene Regulation and Genome Instability
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Nuclear RNA Exosome at 3.1 Å Reveals Substrate Specificities, RNA Paths, and Allosteric Inhibition of Rrp44/Dis3  John C. Zinder, Elizabeth V. Wasmuth,
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Structural Basis for the Major Role of O-Phosphoseryl-tRNA Kinase in the UGA-Specific Encoding of Selenocysteine  Shiho Chiba, Yuzuru Itoh, Shun-ichi.
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Structure of the RNA 3′-Phosphate Cyclase-Adenylate Intermediate Illuminates Nucleotide Specificity and Covalent Nucleotidyl Transfer  Naoko Tanaka, Paul.
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 408-421 (February 2015) The Ratcheted and Ratchetable Structural States of RNA Polymerase Underlie Multiple Transcriptional Functions  Shun-ichi Sekine, Yuko Murayama, Vladimir Svetlov, Evgeny Nudler, Shigeyuki Yokoyama  Molecular Cell  Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 408-421 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cys-Pair Crosslinking Analyses of RNAP Structural Forms and Effects of Nucleic Acids, Gfh1, and GreA (A) Schematics of two RNAP structural forms: the tight and ratcheted forms. (B) Schemes of the nucleic acid scaffolds. EC15, the posttranslocation state of the elongation complex (EC); EC16, the pretranslocation state of EC; BC17, the one-nucleotide backtracked state; BC24, the eight-nucleotide backtracked state. (C) The two Cys sites (α R185C and β′ E692C) introduced into T. thermophilus RNAP. The RNAP coordinates in the ratcheted form (PDB 3AOH, colored) are superimposed on those in the tight form (PDB 2O5I, gray) by the α subunit. The Cα–Cβ bonds are shown as orange sticks. (D) Cys-pair crosslinking (CPX) formation. The variant was incubated at 25°C for 2 hr in pH 6.5 buffer, in the presence or absence of the EC15 scaffold or Gfh1. After the incubation, the proteins were resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). (E) Quantitation of CPX formed in (D). The amounts of α–β′ crosslinks (normalized to EC15) are depicted as bars. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 4). The absolute values are provided in Table S1. Unpaired t test, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (F) The effects of the nucleic acid scaffolds and GreA. The variant was preassembled with the EC15, EC16, BC17, or BC24 scaffold, and CPX was measured in the absence or presence of the GreA variant (D42A/E45A). The reaction was performed at 25°C for 90 min in pH 8.0 buffer. (G) Quantitation of CPX formed in (F). ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Enzymatic Activities by RNAP in the Ratcheted Form (A) Experimental setup for the RNA cleavage reaction. Cleavage of the 5′-fluorescently labeled 17-mer RNA in BC17 by RNAP yields a 15-mer RNA. (B) Experimental setup for the nucleotide addition and its reversal. Upon the addition of a substrate NTP, the 15-mer RNA in EC15 is extended by one nucleotide to yield a 16-mer RNA. Conversely, the 16-mer RNA in EC16 is trimmed at its 3′ end to yield a 15-mer RNA upon the addition of pyrophosphate. (C) Intrinsic RNA cleavage. The wild-type RNAP, the maximally (∼74%) oxidized CPX variant (CPXOX), and that rereduced with DTT (CPXRED) were assembled with the BC17 scaffold. The reaction was performed at 40°C, in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM MgCl2. The graph depicts the time course of the reaction. The dashed line shows the curve of CPXRED multiplied by 0.26, to approximate the contribution of the uncrosslinked fraction (∼26%) in CPXOX. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3) (for all graphs in this figure). For many data points, the errors were very small and are obscured by the graph symbols. (D) GreA-dependent RNA cleavage (15°C). The inset shows a magnification of the earlier time points. (E) Single nucleotide (UMP) addition to EC15 (20°C). (F) Pyrophosphorolysis of EC16 (30°C). See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of the BC (A) Overall structure of the BC in two orientations. The structural modules of RNAP are colored (core, gray; shelf, cyan; clamp, yellow-green; jaw-lobe and β′-NCD, light blue; BH, purple; TL, green). The nucleic acids are colored as in Figure 1B. (B) Structural comparison with EC. The structures of BC [colored as in (A)] and EC (light orange, PDB 2O5I) are superimposed by their core modules. (C) The BC catalytic site. The 2Fo–Fc electron density maps for DNA/RNA, FL, and TL are shown as blue meshes. (D) The proofreading site. The active site of RNAP is viewed from the secondary channel. (E) Comparison of the TL conformation with the backtracked and frayed RNAP II. (F) The NTP-insertion complex (slate, PDB 2O5J), superimposed on BC via the shelf module. In the straight conformation, TL would clash with the extruded RNA 3ʹ end (A16) and FL. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structure of the Gre-C1-Bound Complex (A) Overall structure of the Gre-C1-bound RNAP in two orientations. Gre-C1 is shown in magenta, with a transparent surface. RNAP is colored as in Figure 3A. The catalytic magnesium (Mg I) is shown as an orange sphere. (B) Structural comparison with the EC. The Gre-C1-bound RNAP (colored as in A) and EC (PDB 2O5I, brown) are superimposed by their core modules. (C) Comparison of the TL conformation with the TFIIS-bound RNAP II. (D) The CPX efficiencies in the CPX_ΔTL variant (normalized to EC16). The reaction was performed at 25°C for 90 min in pH 8.0 buffer. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 4). Unpaired t test, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (E) Comparison of the active sites. The active sites in the NTP-insertion complex (PDB 2O5J), the BC, and the Gre-C1-bound RNAP are shown. The 2Fo–Fc electron density map for Gre-C1 is shown as a blue mesh (contoured at 1.0σ). The Cα atoms of Asp42 and Glu45 are shown as spheres. (F) Comparison of the secondary channels. See also Figures S4 and S5. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The RNA-Binding Mode Switches upon Gre Binding (A) The path of the RNA 3ʹ end switches upon Gre binding. The Gre-C1-bound complex is superimposed on the BC by their core modules. The RNA in BC is colored red, except for the +2 residue (A16), which is yellow. As no density was observed for RNA in the Gre-C1-bound complex, it was modeled and shown in green. The β Met560 residue is shown as a stick model. (B) Intrinsic and GreA-dependent RNA cleavage activities by the wild-type and β M560W mutant RNAPs (40°C). An image of the denaturing gel and a graph of the time courses of RNA cleavage in BC17 are shown. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effects of Mismatch, his-Pause Scaffold, and Upstream Hairpin (A) CPX efficiencies in the mismatch-paused complexes. The CPX variant was preassembled with the indicated scaffolds, and the S-S bond formation was measured in the absence or presence of the GreA variant (D42A/E45A). The reaction was performed at 25°C for 80 min in pH 8.0 buffer. Data represent mean ± SD (normalized to EC16, n = 4). Unpaired t test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (B) CPX efficiencies in the his-pause complex. (C) CPX efficiencies in the terminator-hairpin-containing complex. See also Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural States of RNAP for Distinct Transcription Functions Schematic representations of the three structural states of RNAP and their relevance in transcriptional events. Molecular Cell 2015 57, 408-421DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions