Accelerated Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells to the Regional Lymph Nodes Is Limited to the Early Phase of Pulmonary Infection  Kevin L Legge,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impairment in Natural Killer Cells Editing of Immature Dendritic Cells by Infection with a Virulent Trypanosoma cruzi Population J Innate.
Advertisements

Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells efficiently cross-prime naive T cells in vivo after TLR activation by Juliette Mouriès, Gabriel Moron, Géraldine Schlecht,
Pancreatic Lymph Node-Derived CD4+CD25+ Treg Cells
The Humoral Immune Response Is Initiated in Lymph Nodes by B Cells that Acquire Soluble Antigen Directly in the Follicles  Kathryn A. Pape, Drew M. Catron,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
by Silke Huber, Reinhard Hoffmann, Femke Muskens, and David Voehringer
Following the Development of a CD4 T Cell Response In Vivo
Dissolving Microneedle Delivery of Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Antigen Elicits Efficient Cross-Priming and Th1 Immune Responses by Murine Langerhans Cells 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Hans-Peter Raué, Carol Beadling, Jennifer Haun, Mark K. Slifka 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Accelerated Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells to the Regional Lymph Nodes Is Limited to the Early Phase of Pulmonary Infection  Kevin L Legge,
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Lung Airway-Surveilling CXCR3hi Memory CD8+ T Cells Are Critical for Protection against Influenza A Virus  Bram Slütter, Lecia L. Pewe, Susan M. Kaech,
Ananda W Goldrath, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Inflammatory Monocytes Activate Memory CD8+ T and Innate NK Lymphocytes Independent of Cognate Antigen during Microbial Pathogen Invasion  Saïdi M'Homa.
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Efficient Induction of CD8 T-Associated Immune Protection by Vaccination with mRNA Transfected Dendritic Cells  Shohreh Zarei, Jean-François Arrighi,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
CD40, but Not CD40L, Is Required for the Optimal Priming of T Cells and Control of Aerosol M. tuberculosis Infection  Vanja Lazarevic, Amy J Myers, Charles.
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Kevin L. Legge, Thomas J. Braciale  Immunity 
Karima R.R. Siddiqui, Sophie Laffont, Fiona Powrie  Immunity 
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Patrizia Stoitzner, Christoph H
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Memory CD8+ T Cells Undergo Peripheral Tolerance
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Accelerated Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells to the Regional Lymph Nodes Is Limited to the Early Phase of Pulmonary Infection  Kevin L Legge, Thomas J Braciale  Immunity  Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 265-277 (February 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2

Figure 1 Efficient Labeling of RDC with CFSE At the indicated time points after i.n. CFSE instillation, single cell suspensions of lung parenchyma (A) or trachea and bronchi (B) cells were prepared by digesting with collagenase/DNase I, stained for CD11c expression, and analyzed for CFSE uptake by flow cytometry. Respiratory tract cells obtained from untreated mice (Nil) were included as a control. The values in (A) and (B) represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within either the CD11chi or CD11cmod DC population detected over time. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)

Figure 2 Accumulation of Mature CFSE+CD11c+ RDC in the PBLN (A) 6 hr after CFSE instillation, mice were given i.n. media diluent. 24 hr later (30 hr after CFSE instillation), cells from four donor mice were harvested from the PBLN, AXLN, and IGLN, liver, and spleen, and then stained for CD11c expression. Representative side scatter versus CFSE staining of CD11c+ gated cells is shown. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population for each tissue. Data are representative of three independent experiments. The inserts in (A) are representative of CD11c+ gated cells from non-CFSE administered mice. (B) Mice received i.n. CFSE or as a control media diluent (Nil), and 18 hr later PBLN cells from four mice were harvested, pooled, and stained for CD11c and either CD40 or CD80 expression. In parallel, pooled PBLN from CFSE-treated donors were first digested with collagenase/DNase I prior to marker analysis. Representative CD40 or CD80 staining of CD11c+CFSE+ (bold lines) or CD11c+CFSE− (dotted lines) gated dendritic cells is shown. CD11c+ cell staining with rat IgG2a or armenian hamster IgG, group 2 mAb (thin line) were included as isotype controls for anti-CD40 and anti-CD80 mAb staining, respectively. (C) PBLN cells from four mice were isolated by collagenase/DNase I digestion prior to (0 hr) or at the indicated time points following i.n. CFSE instillation, pooled, and stained as in (B) for CD11c, CD40, and CD80 expression. Shown is the percentage of CD80hi (CD80hi % total CD11c+, ο) or CD40hi (CD40hi % total CD11c+, open triangles) cells among total CD11c+ cells. Also shown is the percentage of CFSE− cells among total CD11c+CD40hi (CFSE− % of CD11c+CD40hi, closed triangles) or CD11c+CD80hi (CFSE− % of CD11c+CD80hi, closed circles) cells in the PBLN over time, after i.n. dye instillation. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)

Figure 3 Augmented Accumulation of Mature CFSE+CD11c+ RDC in the PBLN following Influenza Virus Infection 6 hr after CFSE instillation, mice were infected with 1LD50 of A/JAPAN/305/57 influenza virus. (A) 24 hr later (30 hr after CFSE instillation), cells were harvested from the PBLN, AXLN, and IGLN, liver, and spleen and stained for CD11c expression. Representative side scatter versus CFSE staining of CD11c+ gated cells is shown. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population from each tissue. (B) 24 hr after infection, PBLN cells from four mice were harvested, pooled, digested with collagenase/DNase I, and then stained for CD11c and either CD40, CD80, or CD86 expression. Representative CD40, CD80, or CD86 staining of CD11c+CFSE+ (bold lines) or CD11c+CFSE− (dotted lines) gated DC of four independent analyses is shown. CD11c+CFSE+ and CD11c+CFSE− DC in the PBLN examined at 6, 12, and 18 hr post influenza infection had expression levels of CD40, CD80, and CD86 equal to their counterparts above (data not shown). CD11c+ cell staining with rat IgG2a or armenian hamster IgG, group 2 mAb (thin line) were included as isotype controls for anti-CD40 and anti-CD86, or anti-CD80 mAb staining, respectively. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)

Figure 4 RDC Migrate to the PBLN in Response to Pulmonary Inflammatory Stimuli 6 hr after i.n. CFSE instillation, mice were given one of the following i.n.: media diluent (A), infectious A/JAPAN/305/57 virus (B), polyI:C (C), CpG DNA (D), LPS (E), TNFα (F), UV-inactivated A/JAPAN/305/57 (G), or GpC control DNA (H). At 12 hr post i.n. stimulus administration, PBLN (solid lines) and AXLN (dotted lines) cells were harvested from four mice, pooled, and stained for CD11c expression. Representative CFSE intensity of CD11c+ gated DC of three independent experiments is shown. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population of the PBLN. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)

Figure 5 Rapid but Transient Accumulation of CD11c+ CFSE+ RDC in the PBLN following Influenza Virus Infection (A) 6 hr after i.n CFSE instillation, mice were infected with 1LD50 of A/JAPAN/305/57 (closed circles, open circles) or given i.n. media diluent as a control (closed triangles, open triangles). At the indicated times postinfection or post diluent instillation, single cell suspensions were prepared from PBLN (open circles, open triangles) and AXLN (closed circles, closed triangles) and examined for CD11c expression by flow cytometry. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population of the PBLN or AXLN. (B) The data represent the absolute cell number of CD11c+ (closed triangles), CD11c+CFSE+ (closed squares), and CD11c+CD40hi (open circles) cells per PBLN from the influenza infected recipients in (A) at the indicated times. (C and D) Mice were infected with 1LD50 of A/JAPAN/305/57 and then given CFSE i.n. at 24, 36, or 48 hr, or 4 days after infection. At 18 hr (C and D) or 1, 3, and 6 (D) post CFSE instillation, PBLN cells were harvested from four mice, pooled, and stained for CD11c expression. Representative CFSE intensity of CD11c+ gated DC is shown. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population from the PBLN. The panels in (D) represent CFSE i.n. instillation at 24 hr after infection. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)

Figure 6 Resistance of RDC to a Second Migration Stimulus and Diminished CD8+ T Cell Responses to Influenza Virus Infections following a Potent RDC Migration Stimulus (A) 48 hr after i.n. instillation of either A/JAPAN/305/57 influenza virus (A and B), CpG DNA (C and D), or control GpC DNA (E and F), mice were given i.n. CFSE. 6 hr after CFSE instillation, treated animals were given i.n. CpG DNA (CpG) (A), GpC DNA (GpC) (B), A/JAPAN/305/57 (virus) (C and E), or media diluent (Nil) (D and F). 18 hr after the second i.n stimulus instillation, single cell suspensions, prepared from PBLN (solid lines) and AXLN (dotted lines) from four mice, were pooled and stained for CD11c expression. Representative CFSE intensity of CD11c+ gated DC is shown. The values represent the percentage of CFSE+ cells within the CD11c+ DC population of the PBLN. (G and I) 18 hr after i.n. instillation of CpG DNA (gray bars), polyI:C (open bars), or media diluent (Nil) (black bars), mice (five per group) were infected i.n. with 0.01LD50 of A/JAPAN/305/57. 12 days postinfection, single cell suspensions, prepared from individual murine respiratory tracts, were incubated in the presence of brefeldin A for 6 hr with HA204-212, HA529-537, NP147-155 peptides, or no peptide (media control). The cell suspensions were subsequently stained for surface CD8β and intracellular INFγ expression and analyzed by flow cytometry. The values in (G)–(I) represent the percentage of IFNγ+ cells among CD8β+ gated T cells for the indicated peptide stimulus. No intracellular IFNγ production was obtained when lung cells were cultured without peptide (data not shown). Influenza viral titers (measured from respiratory tract suspensions from three recipient mice) following infection were as follows: day 2 Nil, 7.6 × 107 EIU/ml; CpG, 7.2 × 106 EIU/ml; polyI:C, 6.9 × 106 EIU/ml, and day 4 Nil, 1.07 × 108 EIU/ml; CpG, 3.07 × 107 EIU/ml; polyI:C, 1.65 × 108 EIU/ml. Immunity 2003 18, 265-277DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00023-2)