Joanne Lomax | BACCN Conference September 2018 | Bournemouth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent Prescribing and the Clinical Research Nurse Dr Kathryn Jones Deputy Director of Nursing For the Research Nurse Professional Development Meeting:
Advertisements

© Quality Solutions for Healthcare Team Leadership Programme Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board Workshop evaluation from 25 th January 2012 Debbie.
Paediatric Assessment Skills Course: Developing an educational programme to support implementation of new nursing roles at Birmingham Children’s Hospital.
Involving acute hospital inpatients in the evaluation of an occupational therapy service Cathy Robertson Senior occupational therapist Wirral Hospital.
Program Content (cont...) Module 3: Responding to clinical deterioration – managing common acute conditions Communicating clinical concerns—using ISBAR.
Appendix 1 Francis report into care at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust – briefing and discussion March 2013.
Microsystem Basics This sheet is designed to give readers a brief introduction to the microsystem approach to quality improvement. What is a Microsystem?
Courage To Listen And To Implement Patient Feedback Pamela Taylor Ward Manager Ward AM3.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: A GUIDED ACTIVITY FOR MEDICAL AND NURSING STUDENTS ON CLINICAL PLACEMENT Professor Amanda Henderson Nursing Director, Princess.
INNOVATIVE THINKING FOR THE REAL WORLD Exploring the Benefits of the Service Improvement Project Lynne Harrison, School of Health.
Modern Matron/Quality Service Nurse 1st Year Evaluation Report Hilary McCallion - Director of Nursing & Education Elaine Rumble - Deputy Director of Nursing.
SMASAC HDU Bed Report Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group 9 November 2007 Dr Frances Elliot.
The power of information: Putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need Giles Wilmore, Director of Patient & Public Voice and.
Hospital Operational Standards Jennie Hall, Chief Nurse Dr Ros Given-Wilson, Medical Director Martin Wilson, Director of Delivery and Improvement.
Development of a hospice based education programme for health care professionals focusing on end-of-life care for people with dementia Kay de Vries Allyson.
PATIENTS IN RESEARCH RESEARCH CULTURE.
Aged Care and Home and Community Care. Step 1: Analyse the application. Identify any key questions for competency conversation. Step 5: Identify any.
Learning to listen Jennie Negus Deputy Director of Patient Services.
Getting Published Gavin Leslie Judy Currey Andrea Marshall Leanne Aitken.
Julie Williams Macmillan Clinical Nurse Specialist Nursing Homes 4 th July 2008 INTEGRATED CARE PATHWAY FOR THE ADULT DYING PATIENT IN CARE HOMES.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Jane Balmer & Kirsty McNeil University of Dundee College of Medicine, Nursing & Dentistry Recognising Delirium in an Acute Medical Setting Results Introduction.
NIPEC: 2012 The Future is NOW Celebrating 10 Years in Practice, Education and Professional Development Developing Staff NOW and for the FUTURE Professional.
This leaflet explains the purpose of Berkshire West Connected Care and how it works. It also gives information to help you decide whether you want to opt.
Exploring delegation a workshop for registered staff Louise Williams Healthcare Support Worker Development Coordinator, Powys Teaching Health Board.
Myanna Duncan Doctoral Researcher Work & Health Research Centre Loughborough University.
Risk Assessment Meeting Introduction Slides --- Your Hospital’s Name --- Hospital at Night Patient Safety Risk Assessment:
Context and Problem Effects of Changes Strategy for Change Aim: To reduce the length of handover by standardising the quality of information transmitted.
What Can Go Wrong? How Often? How Bad? Is there a Need for Action?
System Change Presentation: Daily Skin Inspections Camilla Hansen 11/25/13.
Lothian Care Assistant Development Programme – An education initiative
Title of the Change Project
Introducing the Academic Advising Model
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
The Clinical Audit Cycle
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
PowerPoint to accompany:
Risk Assessment Meeting
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
DIABETES 10 POINT TRAINING
Assisting with the Nursing Process
Sullivan County 4-H Activities Day
Welcome Using SBAR in handovers Main title slide page
The Concept of Communication Skills in Medicine
Reducing Omitted Doses through Audit
Clinical Pathways to enhance quality of care
SBAR Situation Background Assessment Recommendation
Why John’s Campaign Matters to Mental health Inpatient Services
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Overarching Transformation narrative – progress so far and next steps
An Acute Problem? NCEPOD.
Jean Tucker Patient Experience Improvement
Procedure and training
Reducing Omitted Doses through Audit
Sandra Christie Sandra Christie Director of Nursing and Performance
Establishing a Paediatric Home Oxygen Forum
2015/16 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Background The following slides display the most recent NHS Staff Survey data (2016), for the questions that were deemed most relevant to the NHS QUEST.
Critical Care Outreach Medway
Medico legal aspects of transfers
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Introducing the Academic Advising Model
4 Steps to Safety Violence Reduction Programme. Implementation
Overview of assessment approach
Discovery Interviews Skills Building Day One Morning Session
Medico legal aspects of transfers
Collaboration & Evaluation
Independent Prescribing and the Clinical Research Nurse
Presentation transcript:

Joanne Lomax | BACCN Conference September 2018 | Bournemouth Improving Critical Care Handovers - a reflection on my checklist creation Joanne Lomax | BACCN Conference September 2018 | Bournemouth Introduction Research reported on in July 2018 found that many clinicians rely on their memory during patient handover which has led to participants reporting feeling less confident that they had received all essential information (Nursing Times, 2018). Bhabra et al (2007) comments that note taking is shown to be an effective method of handover. The design of the handover sheet embed these principles and helps provide a structured approach to handover note taking. This has helped colleagues in ICU to be more assured in handover and ensure tasks and process are recorded to be shared at handover, aiding efficiency and with the aim to support patient safety. Development of the Handover checklist Over a period of time I began to recognise the basic structure of the handover from nurse-nurse on my unit. I also noted how my colleagues would document the patient’s care at the end of the shift and use this as a baseline for the handover to the following shift. Aslanidis, et al. (2014) identified that the structure of the intensive care handover should emphasise a system-based approach focusing on each system in turn, such as the respiratory system and the central nervous system. The Conwy and Denbighshire NHS Trust (2007) also recommended that as well as a structured approach the handover should follow the 5 P’s rule: P1: Patient’s name, diagnosis, doctor and past relevant history P2: Patient’s date/reason for admission P3: Present restrictions (i.e. fluids only etc.) P4: Plan of care P5: Progression The NMC Code of Conduct (2015) outlines that as registered nurses we need to make sure that any treatment or care for which we are responsible is delivered without undue delay and that we manage time effectively to ensure the quality of care delivered is putting the needs of those receiving care first. I also included a time line so that I could document my jobs and ensure they were completed according to the time I needed them done. With all this mind, I designed the handover/checklist. Initially it’s intention was for my own use, however as more colleagues saw me working with it, it was suggested it was rolled out across the unit. Discussion & results Staff were invited to respond to a survey to evaluate the effectiveness of the handover/checklist. Of 37 respondents, 25 use the task list and of these 25, 88% thought the list had a positive impact (12% thought the impact was neutral). 100% (n=25) would recommend to new colleagues on ICU and 83% to other wards and units. Of the 22 who thought the list had a positive impact, 91% thought it improved handover and 73% thought it improved time management. The introduction of the structured handover model has ensured that handover between nursing staff is properly documented and that tasks are completed in good time. There has been no recommendation for change to act on; however following on from the results of the study the handover has now been introduced to other critical care areas in the trust. Key points The handover task list has been quickly adopted by staff – without any mandate Staff agree the checklist has benefits to handover and time management Other wards are also adopting, demonstrating its flexibility & value Anecdotally new nurses have found the checklist provides a quality structure and level of detail expected in handovers