Examination of a Boundary Layer Jet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THERMAL SOARING FORECASTING SkewT Plots, Boundary Layers BLIPMAPS, Models and Methods RICHARD KELLERMAN SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2004.
Advertisements

Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.
Acknowledgments Jennifer Fowler, University of Montana, Flight Director UM-BOREALIS Roger DesJardins, Canadian East Fire Region, Incident Meteorologist.
MET 61 1 MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology - Lecture 2 “The atmosphere (II)” Dr. Eugene Cordero San Jose State University.
Chapter 9 Vertical Motion. (1) Divergence in two and three dimensions. The del “or gradient” operator is a mathematical operation performed on something.
Chapter 8 Coordinate Systems.
MET 61 1 MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology - Lecture 10 Atmospheric Dynamics Dr. Eugene Cordero Ahrens: Chapter 9 W&H:
Lecture 1 Geraint Vaughan. Radiosondes Vaisala RS80 Vaisala RS92 Launching a radiosonde European radiosonde stations (launch 00 and 12 UTC) Data available.
Extratropical Synoptic-Scale Processes and Severe Convection John Monteverdi Doswell, C.A. III, and L.F. Bosart, 2001: Extratropical synoptic-scale processes.
Using microwave radiometer and Doppler lidar data to estimate latent heat Chris. Collier 1, Jenny Davis 1, Fay Davies 1 and Guy Pearson 1,2 1. Centre for.
AOSS 321, Winter 2009 Earth Systems Dynamics Lecture 12 2/17/2009
Lessons 22,23,24 Upper Level Winds
Warning! In this unit, we switch from thinking in 1-D to 3-D on a rotating sphere Intuition from daily life doesn’t work nearly as well for this material!
Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain
Fronts and Frontogenesis
The diagram shows weather instruments A and B.
Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis. Weather forecasting by the U.S. government began in the 1870s when Congress established a National Weather.
ADVENTURE IN SYNOPTIC DYNAMICS HISTORY
ENSC201 Part 1. Energy and Mass Chapter 1. Composition and Structure of the Atmosphere.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Basic dynamics ●The equations of motion and continuity Scaling
What set the atmosphere in motion?
An Evaluation of the Influence of the Morning Residual Layer on Afternoon Ozone Concentrations in Houston Using Ozonesonde Data.
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
Airborne Studies of Atmospheric Dynamics
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
Level of No Motion (LNM)
Jets Dynamics Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a.Why, when and where? b.What is a jet streak? c.Ageostrophic flow associated with jet streaks.
Height Matters. Wind, Temperature, and Humidity.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Snapshots of WRF activities in the GFI/Iceland groups.
Class 8. Oceans Figure: Ocean Depth (mean = 3.7 km)
Correlation Tests Between the Craven SigSvr Parameter and Severe Weather Calvin Moorer EAS4803 Spring 09.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
 p and  surfaces are parallel =>  =  (p) Given a barotropic and hydrostatic conditions, is geostrophic current. For a barotropic flow, we have and.
HORIZONTAL AIR MOTIONS HOW WIND ARISES AT THE LAND AND OCEAN SURFACE DEFINITION: PRESSURE GRADIENT = DIFFERENCE IN PRESSURE FROM ONE POINT TO ANOTHER VERTICALLY,
Cross-Section Analysis metr2413 April 2, Cross-Section Analysis Illustrates the vertical structure of the atmosphere (2D vs 1D) Compliments horizontal.
Forces and accelerations in a fluid: (a) acceleration, (b) advection, (c) pressure gradient force, (d) gravity, and (e) acceleration associated with viscosity.
A Closer Look at Damaging Surface Winds Timothy A. Coleman and Kevin R. Knupp The University of Alabama in Huntsville AMS 12th Conference on Mesoscale.
ThermodynamicsM. D. Eastin We need to understand the environment around a moist air parcel in order to determine whether it will rise or sink through the.
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
Examining the connection between the dynamics of western boundary shelves and the deep sea using satellite altimetry data Nicholas Trefonides and James.
Define and we have • At the sea surface (z=0), the surface current flows at 45o to the right of the wind direction Depends on constant Az => • Current.
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Temperature Advection
Hodograph Analysis Thermal Advection Stability
Evaluation of the Cuban Wind Atlas
Meteorological charts
Jets Dynamics Weather Systems – Fall 2017
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
Constant Pressure Maps
NATS 101 Lecture 14 Air Pressure
Jackie May* Mark Bourassa * Current affilitation: QinetiQ-NA
Unit 6 – Part I: Geostrophy
Hydrostatics Dp Dz Air Parcel g.
Upper air Meteorological charts
Thermal Wind, Temperature Advection, and Doppler
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
OC 3750 Operational Oceanography
Comparison of Aircraft Observations With Surface Observations from
Thermal Wind, Temperature Advection, and Doppler
Marine Environment Radio-Sonde Verification of High Resolution Mesoscale MM5 Model Runs   OC 3570 Project By LCDR Jimmy Horne.
OC3570 Operational Meteorology and Oceanography LCDR John A. Okon
Central California Circulation Study
A HEIGHT AND STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF THE MARINE BOUNDARY LAYER OFF THE CALIFORNIA COAST LCDR Matthew J. Moore   13 Sep 2004 OC3570 Cruise Project.
Evaluation of a Statistical Refractivity Model using Observations from R/V PT SUR OC3570 LCDR Henry A. Miller 18 September 2001.
Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB)
LT Tom Moneymaker Advisor: Prof Peter Guest
ADCP-Corrected Absolute Geostrophic Current and Transport
Presentation transcript:

Examination of a Boundary Layer Jet LCDR Marc E. Touchton 19 Sept 2001

Outline Introduction Dynamics Data Assumptions Results Sources of Error Conclusions

Before Port San Luis “This won’t be too bad”

Introduction R/V Pt Sur experienced strong winds and rough seas August 06-07, 2001 Rawinsondes indicated the existence of a boundary layer jet offshore Conditions were noticeably improved close-in to shore

After Big Sur Coast “Please, can I keep something down now?”

Scatterometry Winds

Dynamics U= -g/f H/y A sloping surface in the positive y-direction will produce a U>0(out of the board) y H

Dynamics(cont) Thermal wind is a measure of the vertical shear VT = Vg(p1) – Vg(p0) VT = R/f (<T>/x) ln(p0 /p1) R=287 J kg-1 K-1 ; f=10-4 s-1 y Vg1 Vg0 VT

Data Three rawinsondes depict the boundary layer jet Launch times: 1323 06 Aug 2001 2046 06 Aug 2001 0154 07 Aug 2001 Used down part for plotting and most calculations

Map

Station 1

Station 2

Station 3

Layer Heights

Temperature Profile

Wind Speed Profile

Wind Direction Profile

Assumptions Ignored temporal variation Assumed bearing between stations was in positive x-direction Assumed no u-component for thermal wind

Results – Computing V Boundary Layer (1-3: 64 m; 1-2: 39m; 2-3: 25 m; dx = 30 km) From Station 1 – Station 3: V=20.9 m/s From Station 1 – Station 2: V=12.74 m/s From Station 2 – Station 3: V=8.1667 m/s Station 1: 15.2 m/s Station 2: 17 m/s Station 3: 13.9 m/s Mean Computed: 13.94 m/s; Mean Actual: 15.37 m/s

Results – Computing V Top of Inversion (1-3: 67 m; 1-2: 48m; 2-3: 19 m; dx = 30 km) From Station 1 – Station 3: V=21.8867 m/s From Station 1 – Station 2: V=15.68 m/s From Station 2 – Station 3: V=6.2067 m/s Station 1: 15.2 m/s Station 2: 17 m/s Station 3: 13.9 m/s Mean Computed: 14.59 m/s; Mean Actual: 15.37 m/s

Results – Computing VT Calculated Mean Temperature for each station Station 1: 18.3692 ºC (1011.3 – 688.4 mb) Station 2: 17.5111 ºC (1012.7 – 638.6 mb) Station 3: 17.1427 ºC (1011.5 – 624.8 mb) Using Mean Horizontal Temperature and Mean Horizontal Pressures VT = 74 m/s Actual Calculated VT: Station 1: -21.5 m/s; Station 2: -24.5 m/s; Station 3: -19.9 m/s

Sources of Error Rawinsonde wind averaging Temporal variations Boundary layer determination Bearing for calculations not perpendicular to wind Averaging technique

Conclusions Boundary Layer Jet does exist Larger set of data needed for more exact determination of actual intensity, extent and location of jet Ideal deployment of rawinsondes would be perpendicular to coast with little temporal variation

Questions? “We have splash down!”