DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Metro Schools Learning Community LB 641. Learning Community/Timeline 1.September 2007 – Commissioner of Education certifies Learning Community (LC)
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Superintendent’s Proposed Budget “If you plan for a year, plant a seed. If for ten years, plant a tree. If for a hundred years, teach the people.
Office of Portfolio Management May 16, 2013 District 30 Middle School Rezoning.
Margaretville Central Superintendent’s Goals.
Attendance Boundary Realignment FONTANA UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT November 19, 2008.
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT BOUNDARIES Board of Education Meeting Eugene Street Board Room July 12, 2011.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET. MSAD #11 District Goals The budget was developed to ensure implementation of the district goals and to prepare students.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 3, 2009.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2006.
Objectives and Timelines Mark P. Mondanaro SCHOOL CLOSING AND CONSOLIDATION FEASIBILITY.
UPDATING 5-YEAR/10-YEAR FACILITY PLAN PLANNING FOR SUCCESS.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
Act 46: School District Consolidation in Vermont Presentation to Blue Mountain Union Board October 6, 2015.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
DRAFT Inman Middle School Community Conversation February 19, 2015.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Progress & Scenario Presentation for The Lexington School Committee March 8, 2016.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Public Forum & School Committee Workshop March 16, 2016.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Student Reassignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Introduction & Update for the LPS School Committee February 2, 2016.
Lexington Public Schools FY Budget 2016 Annual Town Meeting – March 28, 2016.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
District Program Design Update
Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting
Dalton Public Schools Special Project Team
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
ENROLLMENT PLAN PRINCIPLES
Moore County Schools Guiding Principles in Student Assignment Planning
Elementary Rebalance.
Class Size Capacity Impact BOARD OF EDUCATION WORK SESSION
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Student Assignment Advisory Committee
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET.
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
JERSEY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Boundary Realignment Analysis
Evanston/Skokie School District 65
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
ES Existing Cond. Student Attendance Area Committee October 25, 2018.
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
Welcome to <School Name> School
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Roles and Responsibilities
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
Roles and Responsibilities
Understanding Grade Level Reconfiguration
Attendance Boundary Development & Revisions
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Presentation transcript:

DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy School Committee Policy Subcommittee-Working Group 2016

Subcommittee-Working Group Membership School Committee members Judy Crocker and Eileen Jay Assistant Superintendent of Business and Finance Ian Dailey Director of Planning and Assessment Maureen Kavanaugh Special Assistant to the Superintendent Sandra Trach Timeline July 26: School Committee August 9: Administrative Retreat August 24: Student Assignment Committee September 7: PTA/PTO President’s Council September 24 and 28: Public Forum October 18, November 1 and 29: School Committee Policy Readings

Draft Buffer Zone Policy Lexington Public Schools has historically maintained specific school attendance areas for each of its elementary and middle schools. However, when circumstances related to rapidly increasing student enrollment directly affect the delivery of equitable educational opportunities, alternative attendance area strategies need to be considered. Buffer zones and redistricting are attendance area tools that can be used to relieve overcrowding, address program needs, promote the balanced and efficient use of school facilities and resources, and ensure educational quality for all students.   A buffer zone is defined as a specific geographic area where students residing at an individual address within that zone are assigned to one of multiple schools designated for that attendance area. All other attendance areas are predetermined and students living within those boundaries are assigned to one specific school based on the student’s address. Buffer zones shall be delineated on clearly drawn attendance area maps that are approved by the School Committee following public hearings. Once approved, these attendance area maps shall be made available in the Superintendent’s office and on the Lexington Public School website. Any changes to buffer zones require School Committee approval.

…Draft Buffer Zone Policy It should be noted that in ALL cases, each student must have a fully completed school registration in order to be assigned and enrolled at a school. Newly registered Grade K-12 students residing in a buffer zone shall not have a school assignment until registration is complete and the Superintendent/designee has determined the student’s school placement. Once a student is assigned to a school, that school shall be his/her school as long as s/he continues to reside at that address. Subsequent siblings shall be assigned to the same school. Exceptions to school placement may be made based on a student’s individual educational plan.   Buffer zones are a necessary strategy to manage student enrollment and programmatic parity. This tool provides the Superintendent/designee greater flexibility to assign students where space and resources afford the most equitable education for all students. While it may be impractical to reconcile each and every student assignment, equity shall be achieved by considering the following factors: Available enrollment data Disparities in class size between schools and/or a condition of classroom overcrowding Once a student is assigned to an elementary school, all siblings will attend the same elementary school Functional and operational capacity of school core space (cafeteria, gymnasium, bathrooms, hallway and stairway spaces) Safe and reasonable school bus transportation and pedestrian patterns Any situation in which the Superintendent/designee deems to be an extenuating circumstance Family preference will be considered but it is not guaranteed.

Attendance Map: Arlington example

Buffer Zone Policy: Community Impact Change in Culture No guaranteed placement at a given school Use of a Central Registrar Student assignment is conditional on a completed registration A Lexington education is a Lexington education Benefits Tool that provides flexibility in response to the urgency of overcrowding Considers uneven geographic growth and individual school space needs Maximize building resources and utilization to promote equitable educational experience across the district Potential Concerns Perceived Impact on Property Value Perceived Impact on Educational Equity Perceived Impact on Social-Economic Equity Impact on Student Transportation

Buffer Zone Policy: LPS Operational Impact Central Registrar More efficient system model More consistent and standardized internal process for registration, data collection, and policy implementation Central access to more information Determination of student assignments Periodic evaluation of Buffer Zones’ location and utilization Ongoing Growing Enrollment Impact Transportation Staffing – teachers, aides, specialists Classroom/Space Utilization Budget Magnitude of impact related to enrollment growth

Next steps Draft Buffer Zone Policy Revisions, Communicate with all Stakeholders, and Vote to Adopt Buffer Zone Policy Ongoing Monitoring of the Enrollment Data Ensure New Policy Compatibility with Current Policies Development of Attendance Map to Match Policy Changes Development of Central Registrar School Building Capital Projects Again, this work being done in parallel by different groups. Together we can change this from a WIP to a series of check marks. Difference bet BZ (S-T and only students new to LPS) and Redistr (L-T and everyone)

We Welcome YOUR Input