FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUARANTEE FUND (EAGF) Owen Jones DG AGRI I.4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
INTERNAL CONTROLS.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
CLEARANCE OF ACCOUNTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES RICHARD CROFT.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes. IT systems SFC 2007 and RDIS Brussels, 3 October 2007.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
Planning and use of funding instruments
OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Click to edit Master title style 1 How to produce a good final report ? How to treat unfinished, non- operational or suspended projects? Commissions views.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Fiche 5A Payment Application Fiche 5B Accounts 12th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 28 June 2013.
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Felix LOZANO, DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
European Union Cohesion Policy
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
“Train the trainers” seminar
Regional Policy Cohesion Policy Legal Package State of play Porto, 29th April 2013 Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ Deputy Head of Unit DG REGIO.D.1 Transnational.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
1 Technical Meeting Closure : Winding-up declaration and Commission procedures Elina Hakonen-Meddings DG REGIO J4 Technical Meeting on.
Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.
European Union Cohesion Policy
1 Irregularities statistics from draft 280 Annual Fight Against Fraud Report for 2008 Maria NTZIOUNI-DOUMAS OLAF Train the trainers European Commission.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
1 CREATING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DRAW REQUEST (OCC) Complete a Checklist for Administrative Draw Requests (Form 16.08). Draw Requests amount must agree with.
Accounting and Financial Reporting
Applicable for Persons Registered under Article 10
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
Office of Operations 2010 Fall Conference State Agency Compliance with Prompt Contracting Regulation Dan Agosto, John Moriarty & Patricia ODonnell.
27th Conference of EU Paying Agency Directors Oviedo, Spain April 2010 MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL UNDER REG. 1290/2005 AND THE IMPROVEMENT FOR THE NEW.
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
VOORBLAD.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
LESSON 4-1 Preparing a Chart of Accounts
1 Insights on cross-border ex ante controls – Polish experiences 27th Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies Oviedo, April 2010.
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Winding-up Declaration and Audit Requirements at the Closure of INTERREG III programmes ( ) Directorate General Regional Policy Audit and.
12 Financial Management 12-1 Financial Planning
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 15% Cap. 2 Why the Cap is Necessary Center reimbursement covers admin. & operating costs (like school meal rates) More $ kept for admin = less $ for.
PSSA Preparation.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
PIC Investments Performance Update Year ended 30 September 2014 APPENDIX Advisor Use Only.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
European Commission DG Agriculture (Unit I.4) 1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY e-Farmer Conference Budapest 31 January-1 February.
37 th Conference of the Directors of Paying Agencies Riga, 6-8 May 2015 Christina Borchmann Director Directorate J: Audit of Agricultural Expenditure Directorate.
28th Conference of Directors of the EU Paying agencies Namur, 27 to 29 October 2010 Workshop 1 organised by the Paying Agency of Wallonia : « Financial.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
Financial Management of Rural Development Programmes DG AGRI, October 2005.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
Presentation transcript:

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUARANTEE FUND (EAGF) Owen Jones DG AGRI I.4

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI) AGRI I.1 Budget management AGRI I.4 - Financial management of EAGF AGRI F.2 Financial management of EAFRD AGRI J Audit of agriculture expenditure (clearance of accounts, X-tables, debtors’ ledger, accreditation, controls)

Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2006 of 21/06/2006: keeping of accounts by the paying agencies, declarations of expenditure and revenue and the conditions for reimbursing expenditure under EAGF and the EAFRD; Commission Regulation (EC) No 884/2006 of 21/06/2006: financing of EAGF intervention and accounting of public storage operations by the paying agencies of the Member States; Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21/06/2006: as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of accounts of the EAGF and the EAFRD.

Shared management Export refunds Intervention Direct payments Sugar restructuring Fund Promotion of Agricultural Products … and direct management (Commission responsibility)

Responsibilities of the Commission Monthly payments (for payments effected minus revenue received by the paying agencies) to the Member States; Ensures budgetary discipline (respect of budget appropriations, payment deadlines, financial ceilings); Check management and control systems in the Member States (e.g. missions in the Member States, clearance of accounts procedure) (Directorate J).

Budget management tasks Prepare and maintain budget nomenclature; Control ceilings, deadlines; Eligibility control of expenditure; Importation of MS declarations; Correction of expenditure; Reimbursement of monthly payments to the MS; Accounting for monthly payments; Follow-up of consumption of credits; Management of payment reductions due to non-respect of payment deadlines; The Early Warning System (forecasts).

Budget and detailed budget nomenclature

The detailed budget nomenclature Is a more detailed specification of articles and items defined in the “General Budget” (there are around 140 items and around 2000 sub-items); Is the compulsory level of declaration of EAGF expenditure in the monthly detailed declaration table (T 104) that has to be sent from the Member States to the Commission (Reg.883/06, Art.4 2(a)).

Why a detailed nomenclature? Marketing/calendar year Product/Measure Deadline for the payments Financial ceiling of the expenditure

The detailed budget nomenclature The detailed nomenclature changes each year because it has to be adapted to the nomenclature of the EU Budget; The detailed nomenclature changes also throughout the year (e.g. budget amendments, new measures); After the start of the exercise, amendments are made in form of revisions & addenda; Changes are presented in the monthly “Agricultural funds committee” and on the website “CIRCA”; All languages

Budgetary discipline

FINANCIAL and BUDGETARY DISCIPLINE Respect of the global ceiling FEAGA - Multiannual Financial Perspectives; Possible adjustment of direct aids (Art. 11 (1) Council Regulation (EC) No 73/093) (Financial Discipline) when risk of exceeding the global ceiling; If the budget is exceeded then payments to Member States are reduced proportionally for the month in question and corrected next year to ensure that all Member States get the same global financing rate;

BUDGETARY DISCIPLINE The Early Warning System is a forecast system of the Commission to ensure, that the budget ceiling will not be exceeded. It is based on monthly expenditure profiles; Monthly early warning reports are presented in the Committee of Agricultural Funds and to the Budget Authority (= European Parliament and Council AGRIFIN Working Group) on a monthly basis.

Budgetary Discipline Reductions

Reduction of payments by the Commission Art Reduction of payments by the Commission Art. 17 Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 Payment deadlines in EU legislation must be respected in order to respect the budgetary discipline and treat beneficiaries equally A Working document is distributed to the Member States in the EAGF Committees indicating the earliest and latest payment deadlines per sub-item

Reduction of payments by the Commission Art Reduction of payments by the Commission Art. 17 Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 With the exception of direct payments, if expenditure effected after the (payment) deadlines is equal to 5% or less of the expenditure paid in time: No reduction; Above the 5 % threshold, all further expenditure effected shall be reduced for a delay of: Up to one month: by 10%, Up to two months: by 25%, Up to three months: by 45%, Up to four months: by 70%, For a delay of 5 months or more: by 100%.

Reduction of payments by the Commission Art Reduction of payments by the Commission Art. 17 Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 Procedure for reductions: Article 17 (1) Reduction due to late payments Other reasons for non-eligibility The MS is asked to submit explanations and the Commission may subsequently reduce the monthly payments Article 17 (2) Overrun of financial ceilings The MS is informed about the Commission’s intention and has the opportunity to submit its comments before reduction

Recoveries

Recoveries Irregularities Administrative error Administrative error In case of recoveries following administrative errors (no irregularity committed by the beneficiary) during the same financial exercise the corrections shall be made on the relevant expenditure lines. In the case of outstanding amounts to be recovered at the end of the financial exercise due to administrative errors the outstanding amounts shall be credited to the EAGF via the annual declaration by item and sub-item (item where initial payment was made, correction by negative sign). If the administrative error is (exceptionally) only detected after the annual financial clearance, the corresponding amount must be credited to the EAGF in the next annual declaration at the latest. D-32284-2007-REV.1. (CIRCA - EAGF Technical documents)

Information to be transmitted to the Commission

Transmission of data by the Member States declaration of expenditure = payment request ; to DG AGRI I.4 ii) forecasts of expenditure; to DG AGRI I.4 iii) annual accounts of the accredited paying agencies - to DG AGRI J.5

Transmission of data by the Member States The global expenditure (Declaration of the 3rd day); Declaration of expenditure (Declaration of the 10th day): Transmitted by the 10th day of each month; Set of documents (T104 +…): Transmitted by the 20th day of each month. At sub-item level including forecasts

Set of documents (T101, 103, 104…) Table 104 : monthly detailed declaration of expenditure and revenue for each paying agency, including forecasts; Table 103 : a summary of table 104 for all the Member State’s paying agencies; Table 101 : difference between the monthly expenditure declaration (= Fax of the 10th) and table 104; e-FAUDIT tables : accounts relating to public storage operations.

Public Storage e-FAUDIT An IT application, using Internet facilities, which enables Member States to calculate in a uniform manner the amounts reimbursed for public intervention storage operations; A new IT system is being developed with your help.

Payment decision by the Commission Based on Declaration of the 10th ; Cover expenditure less assigned revenue; Without prejudice to future corrections; Paid on the 3rd working day of the month following the declaration; Funds committee consulted; Document made available beforehand.

Calculation of the monthly payments Monthly payments concerning the payments made by Member states in the month ‘n’ (September) Month ‘n’ (September ) Month ‘n +1’ ( October Month ‘n+2’ ( November 10th 20th 3 rd working day 10 th of the month declaration : expenditure ‘n’ Monthly detailed of Monthly payment up to the 3 wor king day EA GF Committee: consultation of Member States Decision of the Commission concerning the amounts of the monthly payment to transfer

Forecasts With the monthly detailed declaration (T104) MS also have to communicate the forecasts for the following months. The declaration of forecasts varies from item to item. (A) = Forecasts have to be made until the end of the exercise; (B) = Forecasts have to be made for a three-month period; (C) = Forecasts have to be made: at the beginning of the exercise for a three-month period, from the declaration for the expenditure of February until the end of the exercise.

Why do good forecasts matter? Reduces the risk of the Commission requesting excessive new funds in future budget proposal; Budget authority: Improves the credibility of the Commission and the Member State; Commission can reallocate appropriations without having to call on for extra own resources. *Compulsory expenditure is reimbursed whatever the forecast;

Financial management of the FEAGA Shared Management Conform to legislation Consistent with sound budgetary management A minimum of discipline and procedure to cope efficiently with all the transactions and exceptions.

Financial management of the FEAGA Workshop Shared Management Please give us your views

Workshop - Q1 Q.1. Concerning the expenditure declarations (10, T104, … declaration), can you suggest improvements concerning the form of these tables and the way to  communicate these expenditure statements to the Commission?  Do you have remarks on how any subsequent correspondence with the Commission is conducted regarding the eligibility of the declared expenditure.

Workshop – Q2 Q.2. Concerning the EAGF/EAFRD forecasts, can you explain how they are calculated? What difficulties have you encountered in developing these expenditure forecasts?