All Appropriate Inquiry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Court System.
Advertisements

1 DEAL OR NO DEAL? ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process Presented By: Joel R. Burcat,
Act 381 Amendments John V. Byl and Richard A. Barr February 5 and 6, 2008.
23 rd Annual Real Estate Symposium Snowmass Village, Colorado The New Rules for Environmental Assessments in Real Estate Transactions by John R. Jacus.
123 Go To Section: 4 Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Quiz: Judicial Branch In A Flash The Federal Court System.
1 UNITED CONSULTING Presentation to
1 P.L Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of January 11, 2002 U. S EPA, Region 5 Deborah Orr May 2010 Laidlaw,
THE BEST OF CLE NOVEMBER 30, 2011 IDENTIFYING AND RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN TRANSACTIONS.
(AS 12) Accounting for Government Grants. Scope This Statement does not deal with: (i) the special problems arising in accounting for government grants.
Managing HAZMAT Liability in Easement Acquisitions Gary Fremerman NRCS Easement Programs Division Workshop Denver, Colorado October 31, 2006.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
All Appropriate Inquiry The New Rules SARA BETH WATSON Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C. American Bar Association Teleconference Wednesday, November.
1 It’s not Greek any more Changes Required by the Final All Appropriate Inquiry Rule and ASTM 2005 Standard Presented by Pat McGuckin December 14, 2005.
Do It Right or Pay the Price! AAI Property Transfer Environmental Assessments.
 Administrative law is created by administrative agencies which regulate many areas of our government, community, and businesses.  A significant cost.
* Old gas stations * Old dry cleaners * Oil/chemical spills from past commercial/ industrial operations * Industrial wastes left on property * Old.
EPA’s Brownfields Program Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment (OBCR) September 2005.
All Appropriate Inquiry International Right of Way Association Appraisal Institute Federal Agency Update, January 15, 2009 Presented by Richard A. Maloy,
The Court System. The US Federal Court System The Current Supreme Court The court has final authority on cases involving the constitution, acts of Congress,
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser – How to be a BFPP Linda C. Martin and Michael C. Wofford Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P.
Today’s Lecture Announcements Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
“The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act March 7, 2005.
AAI Rulemaking and Minimizing Environmental Liabilities Charlotte Neitzel Holme Roberts & Owen LLP.
1 The Brownfields Grant Program and Opportunities for Revitalization of RCRA Sites Linda Garczynski, Director Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
TOO TOXIC? THE CHALLENGE OF NON-STATUTORY ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY AT BROWNFIELDS SITES September 2, 2015 – 10:45 am AMY L. EDWARDS, Holland & Knight LLP.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
November Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries Patricia Overmeyer EPA Office of Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment.
American Government and Politics Today Chapter 15 The Courts.
Copyright © 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Uniform Environmental Covenants Act November 18, 2009 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202) Brownfields.
Revolving Loan Fund Department of Toxic Substances Control Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program Stewart W. Black Acting Deputy Director Brownfields.
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act Alphabet Soup: Making Sense of IC’s, LUC’s, AUL’s and UECA Kurt Strasser November 13, 2006.
Environmental Site Assessments in Waste Cleanup Cases July 29, 2012 Risk Assessment.
The Courts AP US Government. Some Basic Legal Terms Litigant – Someone involved in a lawsuit. This includes both plaintiff (one bringing the charge) and.
Magruder’s American Government
1 ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES PROPOSED FEDERAL STANDARDS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
1 Mission Impossible: Redeveloping the Most Complex Brownfield Sites The Legal Perspective Brownfields 2006 November 15, 2006 James B. Witkin Linowes and.
ASTM E1527 (Phase I Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM E1528 (Transaction Screen Process) ASTM 1903 (Phase II Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM Standards.
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act Brownfields Conference November 15, 2006 Boston, Massachusetts William R. Breetz.
Brownfields 101: Liability EPA Brownfields 2006 Conference November 12, 2006 Barbara Kessner Landau, Esq. Bernstein, Cushner & Kimmell, P.C.
Minnesota CLE June Webcast Extravaganza Environmental Law Basics for the Business and Real Estate Practitioner Joseph G. Maternowski, Hessian & McKasy,
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Robert Humphreys US Government
American Government and Politics Today
The Federal Court System
Legal Basics.
Chapter 18 “The Federal Court System”
Chapter 14 The US Supreme Court.
The Court System.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 7.
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Judicial Branch.
Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government
EPA Brownfields Funding Opportunities
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
The Courts AP US Government.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
Primary function is to resolve disputes over the meaning of
Overview of Legal Process in IP Cases
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
The United States Court System
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties
Every Acre of Brownfields Developed
Presentation transcript:

All Appropriate Inquiry December 6, 2005 Kermit Rader, Esquire Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen LLP 1650 Arch Street, 22nd Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 (215) 977-2708 krader@wolfblock.com .

CONTEXT 2002 Federal Brownfields Amendments to Superfund Reflect and Encourage Shift of Responsibility for Brownfields Sites to the States 1. Enforcement Bar 2. Funding for Grants and Loans

CONTEXT Continued 3. Defenses a. Bona Fide Purchasers and Continuous Property Owners b. Bona Fide Purchaser v. Innocent Landowner c. All Appropriate Inquiry i. Initially use of ASTM – 00 constituted All Appropriate Inquiry ii. EPA required to create new standard d. Reasonable Steps Following Acquisition i. Required notices ii. Prevent releases iii. Cooperation with investigation and cleanup iv. Comply with institutional controls Including 8 Circuit Courts of Appeals

Importance of Due Diligence Beyond Defenses CONTEXT Continued Importance of Due Diligence Beyond Defenses a. Value of Property b. Ability to develop c. Issues not addressed by AAI or ASTM 1. Background: Aviall purchased several manufacturing facilities from Cooper in Texas. Aviall discovered contamination, in part resulting from Cooper's activities.Aviall reported the contamination to the State TCEQ which threatened enforcement unless Aviall cleaned it up. Aviall cleaned up the contamination without state enforcement and sued Cooper for its share. Cooper defended, in part by saying the clear reading of 113 is that a party can only sue after a civil enforcement action. The lower court agreed but the 5th Cir. Appellate Court reversed saying that the word "may" implied that the rest of the language was not a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing a contribution Action. The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed and overturned the 5th Circuit holding (see slide). The politics and the dynamics of the case are interesting. The Supreme Court requested an opinion from the Justice Department as to whether it should hear the case in the first instance. DOJ said it should and that the 5th Circuit was wrong. Most perceived DOJ took this position because of liabilities associated with federal facilities. Also, 24 states, 9 associations and 14 companies filed amicus briefs siding with Aviall. The only other brief filed on the side of Cooper was by DOJ. 2. Courts are currently split on whether or not a party has a contribution action under 107. Many courts have held that only non-liable parties can bring 107 actions. I.e., since ownership likely makes you a liable party, you would be precluded from brining a 107 case in most jurisdictions.

AAI will become standard practice in field CONTEXT Continued AAI will become standard practice in field 1. Lenders will require 2. ASTM 05 3. Negotiated rulemaking process Companies otherwise thinking about cleaning up sites for sale may also be discourages from doing so.

1. Differences between AAI and ASTM are incremental and subtle OVERVIEW 1. Differences between AAI and ASTM are incremental and subtle 2. Overall process and types of information are the same

OVERVIEW Continued For most users the most important issue will be ensuring that reports certify compliance with AAI. City wanted to re-develop waterfront property. The EDC would own the property but would lease it for nominal rent to private developers for nominal rent. Private homeowners whose property would be taken opposed takings.

Comparison of AAI to ASTM 1. Environmental Professional a. ASTM has only general requirement b. AAI establishes minimum requirements for education and experience on a sliding scale i. 3 years experience and PE, PG ii. 5 years experience and BS in relevant field iii. 10 years experience with no particular education required, major revision from draft rule City's decision that redevelopment will serve public purpose by bringing more jobs to area and more tax revenue was reasonable. This public purpose amounts to a public use under the 5th Amendment even though private parties will also reap benefits. Sharply divided Court (5-4). Dissenters worried that giving this kind of deference to local government decisions will give too much power to politically influential citizens to the detriment of those without such influence. Dissenters worried that the Court's decision will allow the taking of a Motel 6 to build a new Ritz Carlton.

Environmental Professional Continued c. Qualifications were most controversial aspect of proposed rule d. Professional must supervise assessment and render separate opinions as to qualifications and compliance with AAI e. Client needs to make sure the report contains certificate Also, what if government know who the developer will be and how it will benefit? Does this raise an issue? Likely to be ongoing litigation over individual cases. Biggest effect however is shifting the focus to state laws/courts.

INTERVIEWS 1. ASTM, as needed 2. AAI, mandatory in some instances a. current owner b. for abandoned property, at least one neighbor c. other persons, e.g., past owner, as necessary d. if not available, report must identify as data gap National League of Cities is trying to stop federal legislation from moving forward.

1. ASTM – 1940 or first obvious use, whichever earlier RECORD SEARCHES 1. ASTM – 1940 or first obvious use, whichever earlier 2. AAI – earliest time of known structures or use 3. Burden for all industrial property 4. Possible sources of information a. Sanborn maps b. Business directories c. Archival information 5. Effect on timing and cost

1. ASTM identifies as a source of information, but often not done TITLE SEARCHES 1. ASTM identifies as a source of information, but often not done 2. AAI requires that either the professional or client search for liens and records of institutional controls a. Will consultants require client to provide? b. Institutional controls becoming increasingly common place – need to evaluate impact on planned use

INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 1. Professional must perform personally 2. Adjoining properties must be inspected from perimeter States with the law include Delaware, Maryland and Ohio HB 2226/HB1249?? (Rubley, R-Chester) would create the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act, to assure the long-term recognition of institutional and engineering controls as part of approved site cleanups. In July, the bill was in the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee. Make sure that you consider this issue and think about deed restricting where appropriate.

Price Compared to Value if Clean 1. Client must evaluate and provide to professional a. Draft rule required providing price to professional for evaluation b. From client's perspective, how do you know whether the price is reduced? c. From consultant's perspective, how do you know whether the client is fulfilling its obligation? d. Data gap if not provided

Shelf Life 1. ASTM, 6 months 2. AAI, one year but: a. Can rely on earlier documents if update appropriately b. Certain information must be current i. Price ii. Inspection iii. Title Previously, only those cleanup liabilities associated with pending or threatened legal action had to be disclosed.

CLIENT OBLIGATIONS 1. Title search 2. Specialized knowledge 3. Price to value 4. Professional likely to specifically request

IMPACT ON TRANSACTIONS 1. Assessments may take longer 2. Need to interview current owner 3. More information will lead to more issues to be negotiated 4. Buyers may request representations relating to information required by AAI a. Earliest structures or use b. Institutional controls c. Price?

QUESTIONS???